Lecture 1 Flashcards
Criteria for determining if idea is radical
Whether new technology is involved
Whether new product or service category is created
Whether patents were filed and cited
Functional structure
Useful as responsibility and authority are aligned and all the expertise used by function.
Problems with coordination as not project oriented
Lightweight team
Coordination to accomplish projects and communication better.
Problems: weak project leader and limited focus of team members
Heavyweight team
Strong project focus, ownership and commitment
Problems: general problem solving, functions divided, risk of over-commitment
Autonomous team
Focused, takes ownership and innovative
Problems: Hard to move back into main org. autonomous team better for architectural innovation
4 reasons why people might not adopt innovation
- Risk aversion
- Endowment effect
- Status quo bias
- All can mean innovations are not adopted
What makes a person creative?
Expertise
Motivation
Creative-thinking skills
Creative-thinking skills
Break cognitive sets and performance scripts
Use wide categories - flexible thinking in several domains
Break perceptual sets
Keep response options open as long as possible
Tools to enhance creativity
Left-right brain alteration
SCAMPER
Design thinking - generating ideas for products and services by focusing on customer + understanding fully
5W’s, 1H - who why what when where how
Attribute association - question all attributes of product
Hurdles to team idea development
No slack time Not anonymous Experts are involved Competitive process Constraining platform
Innovation strategy
External oriented gameplay of how to generate, capture and deliver value. Where to invest resources, protect innovations and which org. structures to employ?
Disruptive innovation
New product or service with a different set of performance attributes that can underperform on attributes that mainstream customers value
Performance in traditional criteria tends to be lower, but still may be satisfactory for new market
Responses to disruptive innovation
Ignore
Focus on and invest in traditional business
Attack back
Adopt the innovation by playing both games
Embrace disruption completely, scale it up
Ecosystem partners
Green - good, mutual benefit
Yellow - partially aligned, term sheets
Red - lack everything: alignment, incentives, plan and agreement
Sequential process model
Pros:
Control, clear communication
Cons:
Iterations in later phases under uncertainty