Module 14 Flashcards
the study of how we think about, influence, and relate to others.
social psychology
Social Psych traits
roduction
We are social animals.
We often seek approval of others.
We are moved to love and to hate, drastically.
We almost always care what others think or what others do or say.
came up with the attribution theory
Fritz Heider
people measure others’ behavior by either their internal disposition or the external situation that they’re in.
In other words, people behave due to their innate nature or because they’re caught up in the situation.
attribution theory
we tend to overestimate a person’s natural personality and underestimate the position that they’re in.
fundamental attribution error
attribution theory example
For example, a person may be quiet by nature, but in the right situation, may be very outgoing.
fundamental attribution error ex.
An experiment with a set-up “mean or friendly” girl showed that we see behavior as being determined by one’s personality, not by the situation.
When we view others, it’s easy to fall into the fundamental attribution error trap. Studies show that when people have the situations reversed,
they better see the situation from another’s point-of-view.
We must be cautious in interpreting another person’s actions or inactions. Liberal or conservative views often serve as a lens through which people see the world.
______ comes into play when interpreting actions or inactions.
Politics
feelings that drive us to respond to a situation, person, or event in a certain way
attitudes
Our ______ often influence feelings.
beliefs
change-of-attitude where people evaluate arguments and respond with favorable thoughts.
central route persuasion
when does central route persuasion occur
Simply, this occurs when you make a quick decision based on initial factors without really thinking about it. You decide based on a snap judgment, emotion, what’s cool, popular, sexy, etc.
says that if a person goes along with small requests, he or she will go along with bigger requests.
foot-in-the-door phenomenon
foot-in-the-door example
For instance, American prisoners in the Korean War were increasingly given rewards for “going along” with communist ideas. What started as something tiny grew to full-fledged agreement with socialism/communism.
To get people to agree to a big lie, start with a small lie.
What’s more, once you go along, what you do starts to become what you believe. That’s why many Korean War prisoners returned to the U.S. “brainwashed” and believing that socialism/communism was actually good for America.
Some good news, the belief-follows-action phenomenon works not only for the bad, but for the good as well.
The role that a person fills also affects his or her actions.
People tend to behave in a manner that they think is appropriate for whatever role they are in.
The most famous role-playing situation was the famous “Zimbardo Prison Experiment” done by Philip Zimbardo at Stanford in 1972.
Zimbardo set up a fake prison in the basement at Stanford, then randomly assigned prisoners and guards.
They role-played. Guards were given clubs and uniforms and told to keep order. Prisoners were given humiliating robes.
The effect—the “guards” assumed their roles and basically abused the “prisoners”. The experiment was called off after 6 days.
The bottom line—
we are what we do.
When our attitudes and our actions don’t match up, we feel tense. This is called __________ ___________ , which tries to bring our attitudes and our actions together to relieve tension.
In essence, we rationalize our actions and we make excuses for what we do.
cognitive dissonance
Cog Dis - We either change our attitudes to match our actions, or vice versa. Usually, it’s the attitude that’s changed rather than the behavior.
The good news,
We either change our attitudes to match our actions, or vice versa. Usually, it’s the attitude that’s changed rather than the behavior.
The good news, changing one’s behavior can be relieving.
People mimic other people’s actions, as with
looking up/yawning
The so-called ________ _________ says we reflect the characteristics of those whom we’re around.
“chameleon effect”
Taking on others’ feelings is called _______ __________—we’re happy around happy people, sad around depressed people.
mood linkage
changing your behavior or thinking to the group’s norm.
conformity
did a conformity study where he asked which line was the same length as another (the answer was obvious).
However, others in the group were “in on the joke” and set up one person who was not.
Those “in on it” chose the right answer a couple of times, then they purposely chose an obviously wrong answer.
The one person who was not “in on the joke” eventually went over to the others’ wrong choice 1/3 of the time.
Solomon Asch
Asch came up with conditions that strengthen conformity…
Insecurity. Group must have 3+ people. The group is unanimous. Someone in the group is admired. No commitment has been made yet. Others watch one another. Your culture values social standards.
The reasons that we conform are…
To avoid being ostracized, which can be a serious punishment. Thus, we respond to the normative social influence
Other people can give us information. This informational social influence
leads us to go along with the group lest we be “left out of the loop.”
informational social influence
meaning, we adjust our behavior to that of the group’s.
normative social influence
did an updated Asch experiment.
Robert Baron did an updated Asch experiment.
Robert Baron did an updated Asch experiment. His conclusion…
If a person is unsure of their judgment, they’ll listen and conform to others.
People in Western cultures, which value individualism, ar
less conforming than people in Eastern cultures.
is obeying the directions of an authority figure (or someone perceived as an authority figure).
obedience
he most famous/infamous obedience experiment was done by Asch’s student, Stanley Milgram. It’s usually just called the
Milgram Experiment or the “Obedience to Authority Experiment.”
Milgram Experimen
Milgram had 3 groups of people…
Experimenter—was the overall boss.
Learner—was to answer word pair questions.
Teacher—was to “teach” word pairs and give electric shocks for incorrect answers.
The Experimenter and Learner were both “in on the joke”—they knew the shocking was fake. The Teacher was left out of the loop.
The teacher would start at 15 volts, then after each wrong answer, go up a notch. The electrical dial went up to 450 volts.
If the teacher got nervous about shocking the Learner, the Experimenter told the Teacher to continue.
Milgram’s purpose was to see how far the Teacher would go (how obedient would the Teacher be)?
The findings—most people (63%) went all the way to 450 volts.
The Milgram Experiment is often cited as ethically wrong. Namely, it put the Teacher under considerable stress (thinking he was torturing the Learner). And, the idea of “Informed Consent” was very questionable because the Experimenter, under false pretense, tried to talk the Teacher into continuing.
Lessons from conformity and obedience studies…
People seem driven to get along and to follow instructions. We are social animals.
The foot-in-the-door effect works, as in the Milgram experiment, the shock started small then worked up. Those who resisted usually did so early on.
Ordinary people are capable of terrible things when just “following orders.” For instance, American soldiers in the Middle East, namely in Iran, who conform to torture and murder of innocents.
People will follow horrible orders even more so when someone else does the nasty work.
the phenomenon of better performance while someone is watching. For instance, runners run faster when competing against people than against the clock.
social facilitation
social facilitation ex
Having others watch arouses us (it wakes us up) to the task-at-hand.
Sometimes though, having others around hinders our performance. This happens when we’re doing something difficult for us.
What we do well, we do better when others watch.
the phenomenon where people put forth less effort while in a group as compared to being on their own.
social loafing
social loafing ex
While in a group, we rely on the group to pick up more weight than when we have to go it alone.
This happens because the person feels less accountable and that his efforts won’t matter much.
Men in individualistic cultures tend to be the highest social loafers.
giving up normal restraints and giving in to the crowd.
Deindividuation
Deindividuation ex
This happens when the group both arouses us and lowers our accountability (we’re hyped up and feel like we can get away with something in the crowd).
Deindividuation is why a normally calm person in a crowd might yell like crazy at an umpire. Sometimes this phenomenon is called “herd poisoning” because the crowd/herd poisons the mind and judgment of a normally rational person.
the idea that the differences between two groups will widen as time passes.
group polarization