Minority Influence is stronger than Majority Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Moscovici et al date

A

1969

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mocsovici et al study name

A

Minority influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Method: the study was a

A

laboratory experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Method: what gender were the participants?

A

female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Method: how many women took part?

A

192

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Method: how many women were in each group?

A

6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Method: participants judged

A

the colour of 36 slides

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Method: all the slides were blue but

A

the shades of blue varied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Method: two of the six participants were

A

confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Method: condition 1

A

the confederates called all the slides green (consistent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Method: condition 2

A

the confederates called 24 of the slides green and 12 blue (inconsistent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Method control group

A

a control group was used which there were no confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Results: control group

A

the participants called the slides ‘green’ 0.25% of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Results: condition 1 (consistent) adopted the minority view

A

8.4%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Results: condition 1 (consistent) called a slide ‘green’ once

A

32%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Results: condition 2 (inconsistent)

A

1.25%

17
Q

Conclusion: the confederates were in the minority but

A

their views appear to have influenced the real participants

18
Q

Conclusion: the use of two conditions illustrated that the minority

A

had more influence when they were consistent

19
Q

Evaluation: the study lacked ecological validity because it was conducted in a

A

laboratory

20
Q

Evaluation: the task was

A

artificial

21
Q

Evaluation: the participants may have felt that judging the colour of a slide was a

A

trivial exercise

22
Q

Evaluation: the study was only conducted on women so

A

the results can’t be generalized to men

23
Q

Evaluation: in a similar experiment

A

participants were asked to write down their answers instead of saying them and even more people agreed with the majority

24
Q

Nemeth et al date

A

1974

25
Q

Nemeth et al repeated Moscovici’s experiment but

A

instructed participants to answer with all of the colours they saw in the slide rather then just one, singular colour

26
Q

Nemeth et al ran three variations

A

there were two confederates

27
Q

Nemeth et al: the three variations were

A

the confederates said all the slides were green
the confederates said the slides were either green or blue-green]
the confederates said the brighter slides were blue-green and the duller shades were green

28
Q

when the confederates always answered green or varied their response randomly

A

they had no effect on the participants repsonces

29
Q

in the condition where the responses varied

A

the confederates had a significant effect