minority and social change Flashcards
3 things minority groups must have to be more persuasive
consistency
commitment
flexibility
consistency of a minority study - Moscovici blue/green slide (aim method results conclusion)
aim = to investigate the influence of a consistent minority on the majority view using a colour perception task
method = groups were shown a series of 36 slides of different shades of blue and asked to say aloud the colour of each slide (blue was correct answer)
3 different conditions : 1 = consistent minority 2 confederates always said green 2 = inconsistent minority called 24/36 slides green 3 = control condition no confederates
results = consistent minority 8% agreed - inconsistent minority 1.25% agreed - control 0% agreed
conclusion = a consistent minority is more influential than an inconsistent one
commitment of a minority theory
its difficult to dismiss a minority view if its maintained constantly even in the face of potential risks or inconvenience = must be worth considering
flexibility of a minority theory
must be adaptable when expressing their view - must not be rigid and refuse to compromise or will be seen as dogmatic
flexibility of a minority study - Nemeth simulated jury
method = p’s acted as jurors in a group and discussed amount of compensation to be paid to someone - a single confederate put forward a minority view and refused to change it = no effect on p’s - in another condition a confederate compromised and showed a degree of shift towards majority view and had an influence on majority but only when shown in late stages of negotiation as early compromise suggest giving in too quickly
conclusion = a flexible minority considering opposing view will have more of an influence
minority influence - snowball effect theory
Xie identified a tipping point where degree of commitment becomes big enough to change majority view - the percentage if opinion holders necessary to tip majority is only 10%
minority influence strengths
-research support for consistency from Moscovici showing a consistent minority and a greater influence than an inconsistent one (8% to 1.25% and Wood et al carried out a meta-analysis of almost 100 similar studies and found minorities who were consistent were most influential
-research support for internalisation as in Moscovicis study p’s were ale to privately write their answers down and private agreement with minority position was greater so majority changed their views but were reluctant to admit it publicly as they didn’t want to be associated with a minority position out of fear of being ‘radical’
minority influence weaknesses
-artificial tasks as research such as identifying the colour of slide isn’t related to real life so they lack external validity and are limited in how minority influence acts in real life social situations
-limited real world application as in real life there is a large difference between a minority and majority group e.g majorities usually have a lot more power and status and minorities have to be committed as they face a hostile opposition
social influence processes in social change
social proof
consistency
role of conflict
ISI
augmentation principle
snowball effect
social cryptomnesia
social proof definition with example
proving proof of the problem e.g suffragettes used a variety of educational and political tactics to highlight that women were denied same rights as men
consistency definition and example
keeping the same point through a long amount of time e.g suffragettes dint change their position despite the attitudes around them for 15 years
role of conflict definition and example
suffragettes proposed different views and voting arrangements to what was already in place creating conflict in the minds of the majority meaning people who accepted the fact that women couldn’t vote had to think of the injustice of it because a different viewpoint makes us uncomfortable so are motivated to join
ISI example
those who moved to suffragettes would have experienced a particular type of social influence and believed they were right in their views
augmentation principle example
suffragettes were willing to suffer to make their point heard e.g imprisonment so were taken more seriously
snowball effect example
at first only a small amount joined the suffragettes but as more and more joined it became a majority and could no longer be involved