MIDTERM 1 TERMS Flashcards
What parts of the brain are responsible for environmental effects on preference?
Temporal Lobe & Fusiform Face Area
Temporal Lobe
hearing; recognizing and using language
What hormone is associated with categorization?
Oxytocin: hormone involved with bonding.
- Released during: Breastfeeding; associated with attachment to child
- Love, cuddling, sexAKA love hormone
- INCREASED COOPERATION BETWEEN INGROUP MEMBERS
Neurotransmitters
chemical signals that regulate neural activity; exist in synaptic gaps between axon terminals, various types involved with different areas of life
Kernel of Truth Hypothesis
there is some truth to stereotype; often exaggerated; this “truth” may be a falsehood that is presented to us
Concepts
group or country of shared feature of related objects (Apple)
Contact With Outgroup Members (Stereotype CR)
- We lack contact with the outgroup - which leaves stereotypes unchallenged (EX: avoiding food you don’t like)
- When we meet as members of our respective groups, we act in more stereotype-consistent ways. Furthermore, we also fall prey to confirmation biases
Confirmation Bias (Stereotype CR)
- If we pay attention to stereotype-incongruent information, we see the outgroup as being less homogenous
- Under stress - we fail to process stereotype-incongruent information, and we fall prey to confirmation bias
Availability Bias/Heuristic (Stereotype CR)
Things/events that more easily come to mind are judged to happen more frequently. EX: 9/11 being such a significant historical event, that when a terrorist attack is linked to Islam, it receives more media attention compared to other terrorist attacks are not linked to Islam
3 types of individual racism:
blatant, symbolic/modern, aversive
Blatant Racism
Non-concealed racism; out in the open.
- Use of racial slurs (EX: n-word)
- Usually associated with pre-1990’s Post-1990’s: The new individual racism - More subtle forms of racism/prejudice
- Lack of explicit animosity towards minority groups
Relationship between Amygdala & Stereotyping:
Several lines of research confirm a relationship between activation of the amygdala when viewing outgroup faces; the amygdala having an important role in facial recognition, especially those showing emotion
Prefrontal Cortex
part of frontal lobe responsible for thinking, planning, and language
Relationship Between Ingroup Formation/Bias & Oxytocin/Endorphins
Regarding ingroup formations, oxytocin and endorphins have been implicated in social bonding
- Higher endorphin release associated with greater group bonding
- Oxytocin related to higher ingroup cooperation and bias opposed to outgroup; Increase in ingroup conformity
Own Race Bias (& its association with the fusiform face area)
phenomenon whereby individuals are faster at recognizing members of their own race that those of other races; explained by day-to-day, environmental exposure to members of their own race; the part of the brain involved with recognizing faces (fusiform face area) is more active when viewing faces of one’s own race compared to other-race faces
How is perceptual confirmation relative to Subjective Uncertainty Theory
WHEN AT A PARTY ALONE, APPLYING STEREOTYPES TO DIFFERENT GROUPS OF PEOPLE TO FIND ONE IN WHICH YOU ASSOCIATE WITH/FIND THE MOST APPEALING.
- EX: avoiding the group of jocks since they’re airheads, but being attracted towards the nerds because they’re intelligent
What are examples physical resources? What are examples of psychological resources?
- Physical: territory, wealth, jobs, food, oil
- Psychological: political power, social status, cultural/religious dominance
Does norepinephrine affect activation of the fusiform face area? If so, how?
It does have an impact in the activation of the fusiform face area, seen through implicit association tests. Higher levels of stereotypical associations between races/words in regular people, but lower levels of stereotypical associations when a norepinephrine beta blocker was in effect. There was less activation of the fusiform face area, in this case, when looking at black faces.
What are the 2 Classic Theories?
Ethnocentrism, Realistic Group Conflict Theory (RGCT)
What are the 4 Contemporary Theories?
Social Identity Theory, Optimal Distinctiveness Theory, Subjective Uncertainty Reduction Theory, Terror Management Theory
Ethnocentrism
emphasized by Sumner; when a person identifies with their in-group, placing it as superior to outgroups; in-group customs perceived to be right, while others are wrong.
- hypothesized that in times of scarcity, people bind together to form groups to compete for survival
- Ingroup LOVE = Outgroup HATE
- Predicts feelings of in-group superiority
- Attitude towards outgroups is driven by hatred and contempt
Social Identity Theory
we exist on a continuum that shifts between the importance of our individual and group identities
- In social settings/groups, the group norms influence how you behave
- Thoughts and feelings of the group become your own thoughts and feelings (“deindividuation” & self-categorization)
- Self-esteem is gained through acting in individual identities, so therefore, self-esteem is then also gained when we act in group identities. We RESERVE parts of our self-esteem that relies on the positive things in which a group does (EX: feeling good when your team wins); also by comparing ourselves to relevant outgroups (EX: rival teams)
- Thus, we achieve positive distinctiveness through ingroup favouritism/bias; when our ingroup is threatened, we must engage in behaviours that increase the group’s status (depend on certain social-contextual factors)
Realistic Group Conflict Theory (RGCT)
prejudice and discrimination result from competition for scarce resources; intergroup conflict is born out of the competing goals of two groups for the same, limited resources (if the goals of two groups are similar yet incompatible, conflict/tension arises)
- Conflict is based off real competition; resulting/promoting more cohesiveness and competition
- When resources lessen, the size of “others”/outgroup increases, resulting in more aggressive attitudes towards them
Minimal Group Paradigm (Social Identity Theory)
persons categorized on the basis of trivial, minimally important similarities
How does Social Identity Theory predict intergroup relations?
- Stability: is the status of my group stable, or could it change?
- Legitimacy: is my group’s higher/lower status valid?
- Permeability: is it possible to move from a lower social status group to a higher statis group
- 3 STRATEGIES/RESULTS: -Social Mobility: leaving the lower status group for the higher status group; Status is stable, legitimate, and permeable
- Social Creativity: change comparison dimension, change comparison outgroup (comparing yourself to a lower status), turn a negative into a positive,Status is stable, possibly legitimate, not permeable
- Social Conflict: status may be stable, not legitimate, and not permeable
Optimal Distinctiveness Theory
Positive social identities are achieved when the need for assimilation (within a group) and differentiation are met simultaneously
- proposes 2 opposing needs:
1. Need for assimilation - describes a need or desire for BELONGING (allows us to understand why we immerse ourselves in social groups)
2. Need for differentiation (assimilation into an ingroup indicates its growth in size/population; thus feeling LESS EXCLUSIVE and TOO INCLUSIVE). When this happens, the opposing need for differentiation arises