May 29 Lecture Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Explain why the “undergraduate participant” problem may not be a problem

A
  • In some areas of research, the problem might not apply (e.g., perception). → you can’t influence what’s going on visually so it doesn’t matter who you test
  • Often, researchers seek to establish a phenomenon at a low cost (or with greater ease).
  • Research with undergraduates may sometimes call for replications with other populations, but this does not invalidate the findings per se.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is comparative psychology?

A

involves the use of a comparative method, in which similar studies are carried out on animals of different species, and the results interpreted in terms of their different phylogenetic or ecological backgrounds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is cross-species generalization?

A

Does the research conducted with animals generalize to humans?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain the probability guessing experiment with humans and rats. Who was better at this? What strategy did humans use and which strategy did rats use? Why (explain with split-brain patients)

A

Rats
Humans: frequency matching strategy
Rats: maximizing strategy

If the information was presented to the left hemisphere, people behaved like people (matching frequencies)

If the information was presented to the right hemisphere, people behaved like rats (behaving associatively) → part of the brain involved in speaking and interpretation never got the info so it couldn’t provide an answer so it just used a mechanism that’s available to both humans and rats (which would typically be overshadowed by ability to think or speak, but not in this scenario).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain the reply to the “But it’s not real life” argument.

A

Mook (1983): “[…] it is the understanding [of a phenomenon] which has external validity (if it does)—not the findings themselves, much less the setting and the sample” (p. 382)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Research in labs is often _______ research. (trying to understand a phenomenon, not equate you’re trying to solve a concrete immediate problem, but rather to understand how the world works).

A

basic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the particle/neuron that was newly discovered to know how the sun works?

A

Neutrino

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why do we not care about the external validity for the experiment of how the sun works?

A

They’re trying to figure out how the sun works (basic research). Unless related to applied research, it’s overrated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is basic research?

A

doing research to gain understanding of phenomena. If you have an understanding of what’s going on, you can make certain predictions and the predictions may happen in artificial or natural conditions which is great.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is applied research? What is an example?

A

you have a concrete problem that you’re trying to solve and then you’re trying to see if the solution is working. (anxiety medication example, not research on understanding anxiety and symptoms or brain chemicals, but a combination of all these things). You need to be extremely knowledgeable on the basic research because that tells you where you need to start looking first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is there a relation between field research and lab research effects when they target the same constructs?

A

When the constructs under investigation are identical, field and lab research yield highly similar results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is descriptive research?

A

describes the characteristics and behaviours of individuals or populations.

not necessarily designed to test hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the four types of descriptive research?

A
  • Case studies
  • Archival research
  • Observational research
  • Survey research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is visual agnosia (under case study)?

A

The inability to recognize objects, persons, and/or shapes while vision is not defective nor is there any significant memory loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is prosopagnosia (under case study)?

A

A disorder of face perception (sometimes known as face blindness) where the ability to recognize faces is impaired, while the ability to recognize other objects may be relatively intact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Can individual case studies be turned into experimental research?

A

YES!

17
Q

What is the Face recognition module hypothesis?

A

may have a processing part in your brain responsible for recognizing faces because it’s so important to human beings → maybe evolution created this

18
Q

What is the “Boring” single-system object recognition hypothesis?

A

there may be a face recognition module, but they wanted to re-examine these pure cases of prosopagnosia because the alternative hypothesis is that there’s a part of the brain dedicated to object recognition, but it can do any kind of object recognition

19
Q

If the patients SM and CR are “pure” cases of prosopagnosia, then:

A

Accuracy for objects should be greater than for faces

Accuracy and RTs (response times) for faces should be worse than that of controls

Accuracy and RTs for objects should be similar to that of controls

20
Q

What is pure prosopagnosia?

A

focused only on faces, but not other objects

21
Q

Is there a module responsible for facial recognition? Does pure prosopagnosia exist?

A

NO and NO

22
Q

What are the three types of observational research?

A
  • Naturalistic observation
  • Participant observation
  • Structured/contrived observation
23
Q

What is Naturalistic Observation? Give an example

A

Observation of behaviour in a natural setting without any attempt by the observer to intervene

Bowker et al. (2009). Naturalistic Observations of Spectator Behaviour at Youth Hockey Games
The purpose of the study was to conduct an examination of spectator (i.e., parental) behaviour at youth hockey games:
- the type of remarks made
- who made them (i.e., men vs. women)
- whether they varied by child age, gender, and competitive level

24
Q

What is Participant Observation? Give an example

A

Observation of behavior in disguise that allows access to situations not usually open to scientific observation → you do this when you’re worried that your mere presence will change the behavior of the people that you’re looking at (so you’re in disguise)

Psychiatric hospital example

25
Q

What is structured/ Contrived observation? Give an example.

A

Observation of behaviour in settings arranged specifically to facilitate the occurrence of specific behaviours.

Staged to observe situations that would be difficult to capture under natural conditions

Ex: change blindness
A phenomenon where a person viewing a visual scene apparently fails to detect large changes in the scene. (you don’t encode all of the information in your environment)

Does this phenomenon have external valdiity?

Simons and Levin (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction
The “passing door” act was staged for 15 pedestrians (aged 20 to 65)
Despite clear differences in clothing, appearance, and voice, only 7 of the 15 pedestrians reported noticing the change of experimenters.