maths Qs Flashcards
(22 cards)
P value is > 0.5. state what this P value tells you about this difference. Explain your answer using the words probability and chance.
This difference is not significant. There is a greater than a 0.5 probability that this difference is due to chance
A teacher studying these data with her students told her lass that no definite conclusions could be drawn when comparing the mean values in the graph. Suggest why the teacher said this
no error bar/ SD
to show if overlap occurs so difference in means is not significant/ due to chance
if overalap in SD
indicated no significant differencnce
if no overlap in SDs
significant difference
24hours to min
24 × 60 = 1440 minutes
nm to micrometers
1000 nm = 1 micrometer
cm to micrometers
1cm = 10000 micrometer
suggest and explain
point and why important
Suggest and explain two ways in which the scientists could have improved the
method used for data collection in this investigation.
- Collect at more times of the year so more points on graph/better line (of best fit) on graph;
- Counted number of individuals in each species so that they could calculate index of diversity;
- Collected from more sites/more years to increase accuracy of (mean) data;
The scientists also concluded that this heat treatment did not affect the xylem.
Explain how the results in Table 4 support this conclusion
- (The water content of the leaves was) not different because (means ± 2) standard deviations overlap;
- Water is (therefore) still being transported in the xylem (to the leaf)
OR
Movement in xylem is passive so unaffected by heat treatment;
mm to micro meters
x1000
if graph going down
negative correlation
Evaluate Qs ideas
1- postive or negative correlation - does it match the statement
2- original data not know
3- another factor causing changes- e.g. diet
4- little evidence/ data for higher values
5- large SD difference - less precise - greater uncertainly
6- No statical test done to show if difference are signficant
Advantage:
1. Over longer period so more representative
2- Diet may vary during the year/from day to day
Disadvantage:
2. Relies on long term memory so may not be accurate
3- Recall of 24 hr diet likely to be more accurate
chi squared
The scientists calculated a P value of 0.03 when testing their null hypothesis.
What can you conclude from this result? Explain your answer.
- Probability that difference is due to chance is less than 0.05
- REJECT null hypothesis;
- Presence of KIR2DS1/allele DOES significantly affect the frequency of high birth mass;
dilution
Points to assess if data is reliable
1- Large sample size
2- Individuals chosen at random
3- Equal number of males and females / same sex
4- Repeat readings
5- Individuals healthy
Points to challenge assumptions made with data
1- Influence of other factors
2- Further studies required
3- How great is the difference / data
null hypothesis
has no effect
Correlation coefficient;
why use median
small sample size
outliers
why used a control
1- Used to compare effect of other treatments / as a baseline;
2. Shows / Measures effect of substance (X);