Main studies in Child Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is our classic study in Child

A

Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the aim of Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg

A

to investigate the similarities and differences in the ratio of attachment style in different countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was the procedure of Ij and Kr

A
  • conducted a meta analysis form 32 seoerare studies from 8 different countries who used SSP
  • they excluded overlapping samples and any studies with children over the age of 2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what were the results of Ij and Kr

A
  • countries such as Germany had a high proportion of Anxious avoidant, this is because they place a high value on independence.
  • there was more variation of attachment style within cultures than between cultures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are strengths of Ij and Kr

A
  • used a meta analysis with carefully controlled procedure increasing reliability
  • for many countries they had two or more studies so they could compare within countries swell
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are weaknesses of Ij and Kr

A
  • SSP was developed in America so can be viewed as ethnocentric, which may not reflect the Normas of other cultures
  • most studies came from individualistic cultures e.g 18 from America and only 1 from china
  • many samples were biased such as middle class.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was our contemporary study in Child

A

Li et al

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the aim of Li et al

A

to see if High quality day care during both infancy- toddler and preschool would be associated with higher cognitive language e and pre academic performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the procedure of Li et al

A

-1364 families from North America took part
- they excluded teenage mothers, ones that did not speak fluent English.
- quality of day care was measures through observation
- these 44 minute observations over 2 days was to distinguish high quality and low quality day care
- at the end of infant toddler, they tested IQ
- at the end of preschool they looked at language and intelligence through various methods.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were the results of Li et al

A

LQ LQ produced the worst outcomes
HQ HQ produced the best outcomes
if there was not enough funding it was best to support the preschool period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

strengths of Li et al

A
  • used a large sample size with various ethnicity’s and classes
  • had significant application to society, showed that it is important to invest in childcare
  • detailed measures assessments.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

weaknesses of Li et al

A
  • the way day care was classified was over simplified and did not look at a wide range of day cares
  • they did not look at the social benefits of day care such as social skills
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly