(M) Part III, L1: Basic Theories as Frameworks in Ethics Flashcards
defined as a basic structure underlying a system or concept
Framework
a set of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that constitutes a way of viewing reality
Framework
branch of ethics that studies the nature of morality
Meta-Ethics
talks about the meaning, reference, and truth values of moral judgments
Meta-Ethics
explains what goodness and wickedness mean and how we know about them
Meta-Ethics
moral judgments convey propositions, that is, they are ‘truth bearers’ or they are either true or false
Cognitivism
right or wrong are matters of fact
Cognitivism
existence of moral facts and the truth (or falsity) of moral judgments are independent of people’s thoughts and perception
Moral realism
morality is about objective facts, not facts about any person or group’s subjective judgment
Moral realism
truth (or falsity) of ethical propositions are dependent on the attitudes or standards of a person or group of persons
Ethical subjectivism
denies that moral judgment are either true or false
Non-cognitivism
ethical statements do not convey authentic propositions; hence, they are neither true nor false.
Non-cognitvism
moral judgments are mere expressions of our emotions and feelings; ethical sentences cannot be either true or false
Emotivism
also called as moral objectvism
Moral universalism
moral facts and principles apply to everybody in all places
Moral universalism
universal ethic exists and this applies to all similarly situated persons regardless of anything
Moral universalism
Which theory is moral universalism compatible with?
Moral Realism
different moral facts and principles apply to different persons or groups of individuals
Moral relativism
various cultures have distinct standards of right and wrong; ethical standards change over time
Moral relativism
Which theory is moral relativism compatible with?
Ethical subjectivism
moral facts are known through observation and experience
Moral empiricism