LOFTUS & PALMER Flashcards

1
Q

What is the aim of lotus and palmer ?

A

To investigate the effect of language on memory, in particular leading questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Participants in lotus and palmer

A

45 students from uni of Washington

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Procedure ?

A

Ps showed 7 video clips taken from a Seattle police road safety video
4 of them contained a crash
Ps were asked to recount what they had seen and then fill out a questionnaire about what they saw in the crash

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What verbs were used in the 5 critical questions ?

A

How fast were the cars going when they …. hit, smashed, collided, bumped, contacted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the results of the actual speed of car in clip compared with the average speed estimated

A

20mph-37.7

40mph-39.7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the speed guessed when the verbs were used ?

A

Contacted - 31.8

Smashed - 40.8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the conclusion ?

A

the wording of the question impacts the participants speed estimates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the aim of experiment 2 ?

A

To investigate whether participants were estimating higher speeds from the response set or a genuine memory change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sample of experiment 2?

A

150 students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedure of experiment 2?

A

All ps watched a 1 minute clip that had a multiple car crash

after, the 2 experimental groups of participants were asked the critical question within a questionnaire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the second critical question

A

Did you see any broken glass?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Results from exp 2 smashed group

A

16 said they saw broken glass

34 said they didn’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Results from exp 2 hit group

A

7 said they saw the broken glass

43 said they didn’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Experiment 2 conclusions?

A

Leading questions were again influencing participants testimony. Smashed group predicted significantly higher than the hit group. Ps in smashed were more likely to say they saw glass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the validity

A

Low ecological validity as lab experiment as its artificial

Film clips are not real life participants don’t see the consequences of the crash

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ethics ?

A

Harm: possibly upset about the crashes?
Consent: ps told it was an experiment but slightly deceived on true intentions of study

17
Q

Reliability?

A

Standardised test is easy to replicate
Study repeated in exp 2
Large sample so consistent findings

18
Q

How does this study link to usefulness debate

A

Led to a great deal of research being carried r out into the best way for police officers to question officers