loftus and palmer evaluation AO3 experiment one Flashcards

1
Q

what is a strength of loftus and palmer

A

standerdised procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how was the procedure standerdised

A

study conducted in a highly controlled lab setting meaning all 45 students recived the same procedure of watching 7 short film clips of a car crash and all recived the same base question of “how fast was the cars going when they…..each other?” however the verb was replased with hit/smash/collided depending on the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how does this support loftus and palmer

A

t/f the study is easily replicable to establish consistant findings on leading questions affecting recall of EWT thus increasing the

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does standerdised procedure increase

A

the validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the study collects quantative data how is this beneficial
gie two points

A

quantative data
objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why is objective a positive point

A

researchers calculated the mean speed each group predicted based on the word they where asked in the question. the study gathered qualative data which is objective evidance on the affect the effect of leading questions on EWT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how does this support loftus and palmer

A

t/f increasing the validity of loftus and palmers findings that smashed had a mean score of 40.5 mph compared to contacted which had 31.8mph thus increasing the validity of loftus and palmers findings on how leadin quesstions affect EWT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how is loftus and palmers study yeilding quantitative data a positive

A

loftus and palmers study collected quantative data in the mean forms of the speed of predicted crash based off words used e.g smashed was 40.5. qualative data is easy to analyse and objectiveh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how does this support loftus and palmer

A

t/f increasing the validity of the findings of loftus and palmer and the effect of leading questions on EWT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

whatis a weakness of loftus and palmer

A

ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

why does loftus and palmers study lack ecological validity

A

the EW watech the seven short video clips of a car crash in the highly controlled artificial setting of a labatory. this is unrepresentive of a real crime or carcrash.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does this reduced about loftus and palmer

A

generalisability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how does it oppose

A

t/f findings on leading questions affecting EWT are unreprasentative of everyday EWT on crimes/car crashes and so the findings are ungeneralsiable to everyday EWT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is anouther opposing evidance for EWT

A

population validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why is population validity an issue

A

loftus and palmer used 45 pp who where oly students from washington uni, in america

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how is this a weakness

A

t/f this is an ethnocentric sample and is unrepresentative of the wider population