LIT6: Gray 2012 Chapter 16: War and peace after the Cold War - An interwar decade & Chapter 18: Irregular warfare - Guarrillas, insurgents and terrorists Flashcards

1
Q

What is Gray’s interwar thesis?

A
  1. It is the proposition that
    there is another great power conflict waiting to occur in the future, most probably organized around the United States and China as competing poles.
  2. One can break away from the traditional focus on great interstate struggles and instead endorse the official American view which holds that ‘America is a nation at
    war’. It produced a strategic context wherein the sole global superpower, the
    United States, is at war with Islamic extremists who resort to violence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the problem with US forces in the 90’s

A

The United States alone had a convincing global military reach, but
without a Soviet enemy US foreign policy and its military backstop were suddenly bereft of navigational guidance.

A political vision of a new world order requires a political visionary, and the United States was not governed by a political visionary in the 1990s.

Generally, the United States was hardly inactive on the world stage in the 1990s, but its behaviour generally was reactive, episodic and not especially determined in the
face of any opposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are New and Old wars? Gray?

A

The strategic violence of the 1990s and beyond was tied by some scholars into a
master narrative which postulated two kinds of war, the ‘old’ and the ‘new’.

Old wars were those between states and their Industrial Age regular armed forces.

The **new wars **of the post-Cold War era, in contrast, were expected to be principally internal to states, possibly transnational, and at least one of the belligerents would not carry state authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Gray’s opinion on New Wars and the application of Clausewitz?

A

Clausewitz’s primary trinity – passion, chance and probability or genius, and
reason or policy – is valid for wars of all kinds and for warfare of any character,
so also for the ‘new wars’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is critique against the new war thesis?

A

There are no old wars or new wars, at least not with respect to their nature. But assuredly the character of warfare periodically is transformed by socio-cultural, political and technological change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Bloody Decade?

A

The 1990s were a bloody decade. The highest, or perhaps lowest, points in the all-too ample strategic history of the post-Cold War devade are:
1. The first gulf war - 1991
2. The wars of Yugoslavian succession
3. African anarchy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Gray conclusion about the state of war in the 90’s?

A

The master strategic narrative that has carried this history along from the end of the eighteenth century to the demise of the USSR was resting in the 1990s.

Political, criminal and even recreational violence were widespread in the post-Cold War decade, but that
violence generally lacked strategic or political meaning beyond the local.

An exception to that condition is religiously motivated irregular warfare, especially in the form of catastrophe terrorism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Regular Warfare and Irregular Warfare?

A
  1. Regular warfare
    Warfare between the regular, armed forces of states.
  2. Irregular warfare
    Warfare between those forces and the irregular armed forces of non-state
    political entities.

To be outstanding at regular warfare does not mean that one will even be competent, let
alone good, at warfare of an irregular kind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why does irregular warfare exist?

A

Irregulars fight irregularly because they cannot succeed, or even survive, in any
other way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the two most common forms of Irregular warfare?

A

The most popular of those names has been guerrilla warfare.

Terrorism is another mode of irregular combat, and it may or may not accompany guerrilla warfare.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Irregular Warfare?

A

Said to include all campaigns other than those where both the opposing sides
consist of regular troops.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Guerrilla Warfare?

A

The character of warfare waged of necessity by irregular belligerents. Its
hallmarks are surprise and the avoidance of large-scale open combat. But to be
conducted successfully, guerrilla warfare generally requires a friendly, or at least
acquiescent, civilian contex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Insurgency?

A

A protracted struggle conducted methodically, step by step, in order to obtain specific intermediate objectives leading finally to the overthrow of the existing order. Is inherently contingent and they must employ irregular tactics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Terrorism?

A

The deliberate creation and exploitation of fear through the use, or the threat, of
violence for political ends.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What forms of irregular warfare are military techniques?

A

Guerrilla warfare and terrorism are simply military techniques that anyone can learn.

Insurgency, in contrast, is not a military technique. It requires military prowess,
but the skills that matter most contribute to public safety, good governance and cultural empathy. And in practice, insurgent movements shift back and forth between guerrilla and conventional tactics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Can irregular warfare lead to victory (Gray)

A

Just as guerrilla warfare is no more than an expedient tactical means to a political end, so is terrorism.
Both forms of irregular warfare are
employed strictly for their strategic effect. If either begins to yield negative returns, it must be halted.

It is rare for an irregular campaign alone to suffice to bring victory.
At some point the irregular side needs to shift combat mode from guerrilla to regular warfare in pursuit of a definitive strategic and political success

17
Q

What are the most important COIN principles?

A
  1. The civilian, not the military, authorities must be in overall charge.
  2. There must be unity of command and therefore of effort over civilian and military
    authorities.
  3. The people have to be protected.
  4. The regular belligerent must behave lawfully.
  5. Intelligence is king.
  6. Take ideology seriously.
  7. The irregular enemy is not the target in COIN; the minds of the people are the zone
    of strategic and political decision.
  8. Cultural understanding is highly desirable, even essential.
  9. Deny the irregular enemy sanctuaries and external support.
  10. Time is a weapon.
  11. Undercut the irregular enemy politically
18
Q

What is the state of the effectivity of irregular warfare?

A

irregular warfare is as liable to stalemate today

As neither side is able to reach the main strength of the other to compel a military
decision.

19
Q

How can irregulars conquer the will of the civilian population?

A

The will of the civilian population is the true battle space in irregular warfare.

There are three especially productive tactics for irregulars to adopt:
1. They can inflict painful and humiliating isolated military defeats on the regulars.
This undermines the government’s prestige and such defeats cause civilians to doubt that the government will prevail.
2. The irregular side will
hurt civilians deliberately even though their allegiance is strategically crucial.
By doing this, the irregular offers undeniable proof of the inability of the
government to meet its primary obligation, the protection of its people.
3. The irregular will attempt to
provoke the regular enemy into tactics that should prove self-defeating.
Since the contest is about rival claims to legitimacy, each side must strive to
provoke the enemy into behaviour that contributes to its delegitimization in
domestic public, and perhaps foreign, perception

20
Q

What is Old and New terrorism?

A

Terrorists of the old school were, indeed still are, motivated by political ideology. They had specific,
geopolitically limited objectives, and, in theory, one could negotiate with them.

The New terrorists have a
religious motive, at least religious inspiration and sanction, albeit one with a political subtext, and are not focused narrowly on a particular issue or two in a limited geopolitical context.

Moreover, they are not careful of human lives.

21
Q

Why is New Terrorism Novel?

A

The New Terrorism is novel in several important respects:

It is organized as a
network, not a hierarchy.

It is indifferent to the loss of human life.

It has the potential to graduate from terrorism, through guerrilla warfare,
scale insurgency in especially vulnerable Islamic countries.

22
Q

What are the reasons irregular warfare has a healthy future? (Gray)

A

There are two principal reasons why a healthy future can be predicted for irregular
warfare:
1.
There will always be conflicts, primarily domestic,
wherein the belligerents are
grossly asymmetrical according to standard measurements of military power.
2. The alleged decline in
the authority of the state under the pressures of globalization. Rephrased, it is claimed that the state is less powerful than it used to be.