Lecture 11: War and Gender Flashcards
What is Gender?
Gender an empirical and an analytical category
Empirical refers to the embodied and ostensibly biological binary of male-female sex difference. Understood empirically, gender can be deploted as a variable to investigate, for example, how women and men are differently affected by, and differently participate in political and economic practices
Analytical gender refers to the signifying system of masculine-feminine differentiations that constitutes a governing code. Gender pervades language and cuture, systemically shaping not only who we are but also how we think and what we do. As historically constituted, the dichotomy of gender codes masculine qualities as oppositional to and more highly valued than feminine qualities.
What trades are usually connect to Masculine and Femine?
Masculine
Strong, Assertive, Breadwinner, Dominant, Rational, Competitive, Tough, Ambitious
Feminine
Sensitive, passive, caregiver, submissive, emotional, cooperative, delicate, empathetic
What are the effects of gender hierachy?
First, gender is relational, so that privileging who and what is masculinized is inextricable from devaluing who and what is feminized.
Second, the priveliging of masculinity does not privilege all men or only men. Gender with its lauded masculinity and denigrated femininity pervades language and culture and devalorizes all feminized statuses. The more an inidivual or a social category is feminized, the more likely that its devaluation is assumed, or presumed to be explained
Even though gender is divisble into masculinities and femininities it does not follow that gender-based expectations for human behavior are constant across time and place.
However, while “the exact content of genders shift with various and shifting socio-political contexts, gender subordination remains a constant feature of social and political life across time and space.
What is WPS?
The adoption of United Nations Security Council resolution 1325 (UNSCR1325) on 31 October 2000 led to the establishment of the Women, Peace and Security agenda (WPS
This resolution is based on four core pillars: prevention, participation, protection, relief and recovery, all underpinned by gender mainstreaming.
Through these pillars, UNSCR1325 “reaffirms the important role of women in conflict prevention and resolution, peace negotiations, peacebuilding, peacekeeping, humanitarian response and post-conflict reconstruction. It stresses the importance of women’s equal participation and full involvement in all efforts to maintain and promote peace and security.
What are the 4 WPS Pillars
- Prevention focuses on preventing sexual and gender based violence
- Protection involves protecting woman from sexual and gender based violence
- Participation means increasing womens participation in peace processes and peacekeeping
- Relief and recovery refers to improving the condition of women in the post conflict environment
What is Critique on WPS?
Critics have been concerned about the disproportionate focus, relative to the other pillars, on protection issues.
Concerned about the marginalization of the conflict prevention agenda, peace activist Cora Weiss (2011) has proclaimed: ‘we can not pluck rape out of war and let the war go on. We must not make war safe for women. It is time to abolish war’.
What is Just Warriors and Beatiful Souls
A way of framing war.
The just warrior is masculine, breave and reluctantly fights if it is necessary for the protection of the weak and innocent
Beatiful souls, are innocent and pure and therefore very vulnerable; their attributes of beaty and peacefulness correspond particuarly neaty with the traditional and still common view of ideal femininity. Their existence is essential for the existence of the ‘Just Warriors’ to be possible.
Human beings will do more terrible things and will endure more terrible things on behalf of others than they will do or endure for themselves alone.
What is Engendering War?
Hunt and Rygiel 2006 developed the concept of (en)gendering war to disrupt and make visible the masculinized, militarized, racialized, sexcualized and classed dynamics through which war operates”. They argue that official war stories do political work: they camouflage interests, agenda, and politics that underpin war for the purpose of legitimating and gaining support.
The most familiar theme in war strories involves constructing the enemy as “Other”
How was (En)gendering used in the War on Terror?
The fight against terrorism is also a fight for the rights and dignity of women
The promotion or protection of women’s human rights has been central to the bush administrations effort to legitimise the war on terror.
The war on terror has also generated narratives about male protectors and female protected: they construct a clear division between the war front a masculinist domain in which masculinity is affirmed in the heroic actions performed on the battlefield and the home front a feminised realm of domesticity and peace.
How was (En)gendering used in the Afghan war?
*Afghanistan has witnessed the use of ‘women as a moral excuse for the implementation of violence’ (Fluri2009, p. 244), at least since 1979.
*The Soviets had claimed to ‘liberate’ Afghan women from the ‘patriarchal social structures’ of traditional Afghan society.
*Also Mujahideen groups that represented the patriarchal social order of Afghanistan employed the ‘saving women’ rhetoric; they claimed that they were ‘“protecting” women from the military and ideological invasions of the Soviets’
How was the 9/11 response (En)gendered
- George W Bush’s forceful response involved also his desire to establish a hypermasculine image of himself and the US
- It is well-known that Bush had personal reasons for enhancing his Militarist/Manly identity
- He had avoided serving in vietnam wasi invested in the image of being a “Guys guy” and arguably hoped to redeem his father’s failure to oust sadam in the First Gulf War
- For many americans, the identity and power of the US had been feminized by its defeat in vietnam, made more humiliating by losing to a people stereotyped as ethnically / racially inferior
- Feminization anxiety was also fueled by the increasing visibility of women in politics and the workplace and the growing strength of LGBT political movements
- Yearning to remasculinize the nation was already present and readily tapped by Bush and his advisers at the nation responded to 9/11 and its spectacular demonstration of U.S. vulnerability to penetration by Foreign Men
How was the ukrainian conflict (en)gendered?
Russia and its leader Vladimir Putin portrayed the conflict as one between traditional masculine values represented by Russia and a feminized Ukraine that supports women’s and queer rights.
The image that has been created is ‘of an inescapable conflict between Europe, the West (and the ‘puppet regime’ in Ukraine) on one side and Russia as the global defender of the natural gender identities on the other’ (Kratochvíland O’Sullivan 2023, p. 348)
Ukraine and its media and supportive social media generally portray Ukraine and its armed forces as pro-women.Images of Ukrainian female soldiers as well as female civilians resisting Russian invasion have been widely propagated.
The music video of the song ‘Stefania’ by the Ukrainian KalushOrchestra, that won the 2022 Eurovision contest, is filled with images not only of ‘traditional war tropes of women as mothers’ but also of resilient female soldiers (Kratochvíland O’Sullivan 2023, p. 347)
However, even in Ukraine, many transgender women have been wrongly held as ‘men posing as women to escape military service’ and humiliated on social media (Farbar 2023).
What is Gender Mainstreaming?
The process of assessing the implications for women and men of any planned action, including legislation, policies or programs in all areas and at all levels.
It is a strategy for making women as well as men’s concerns and experiences an integral dimension of the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of policies and programs in all political, economic and societal spheres so that women and men benefit equally and inequality is not perpetuated. The ultimate goal is to achieve gender equality… gender mainstreaming does not replace the need for targeted, women specific policies and programs or positive legislation, nor des it substitute for gender units or gender focal points
What are the 4 elements of Gender Mainstreaming
- Gender Parity Numerical concept related to gender equality. Gender parity concerns relative equality in terms of numbers and proportions of women and men, girls and boys, and is often calculated as the ratio of female-to-male values for a given indicator
- Gender Equality Equal rights, responsabilites and opportunities of women, men, girls and boys
- Gender Balance Human resources and equal participation of women and men in all areas of work, projects or programmes
- Gender Essentialism Defining women and men by biological gender
How to apply gender mainsteaming in the military context?
- Gender Parity: The need to increase the number of women in national militaries at all levels
- Gender Equality: The need to reassess eligibility requirements for senior roles in the military to ensure female leadership
- The need to reassess the institutional design of the military to make it more gender equal e.g. training, physcial requirements, equipment, social norms etc.