Lesson Three: Logical Reasoning & Logic Games Flashcards
–LOGICAL REASONING–
Rules for Approaching a Weaken Question:
- The stimulus will always contain an argument.
Weaken questions ask you to weaken the reasoning the author (or whoever) uses in the stimulus.
Using reasoning (premises) requires that reasoning to lead to a conclusion.
Thus, every weaken question will have an argument.
It’s your job to identify, isolate, and assess the premises and conclusion of the argument.
Rules for Approaching a Weaken Question:
- Focus on the Conclusion
Pay attention to the conclusion. Most weaken answer choices impact what’s said in the conclusion of an author’s argument.
If you know the conclusion, you’ll be able to better differentiate between correct, and incorrect answers.
Rules for Approaching a Weaken Question:
- Info in the stimulus is suspect.
Weaken questions are asking you to weaken the reasoning of the author.
The test wouldn’t ask you to weaken the reasoning of the author if it couldn’t be weakened.
The reasoning is prone to error, meaning there is error in the reasoning of the stimulus.
Read the argument carefully to find the error-prone reasoning.
Rules for Approaching a Weaken Question:
- Prephrase your Answers
Before diving into the answer choices, take time to speculate what you think the answer choices should look like.
This WILL save you time when choosing answers.
Rules for Approaching a Weaken Question:
- Answer choices w/ New Information can be accepted.
This isn’t like Must Be True / Main Point questions where new info isn’t allowed.
The point of Weaken questions is to choose the answer choice that will best weaken / undermine the reasoning in the stimulus, even if the answer uses new info.
Just because an answer choice uses new info doesn’t qualify it to be eliminated.
Typical Weaken Scenarios:
Most weaken questions in the LSAT occur when the stimulus uses…
1) Incomplete Information
2) Improper Comparison
3) Qualified Conclusion
1) Incomplete Information
When the author
- doesn’t account for all possibilities
OR
- relies on evidence that is incomplete
How do we combat Incomplete Information Question Stems?
- Introduce new possibilities (that went unaccounted for by the author).
- Introduce damaging information (that reveals how the information is incomplete)
- (e.g. omitted information)
2) Improper Comparison
when the author makes a comparison between things a efficiently/considerably similar.
3) Qualified Conclusion
when the author limits the conclusion in a way that leaves it open to attack.
Three Incorrect, yet Attractive, Answer TRAPS
- Opposite Answer
- Shell Game Answers
- Out of Scope Answers
- Opposite Answer
Directly opposes what the question stem is asking of you.
(i.e. if we’re dealing with weaken questions, then any answer that strengthens is an opposite answer).
- Shell Game Answer
Remember, the Shell Game tells us there are answer choices that are similar to what’s said in the stimulus but are slightly altered to be incorrect.
–> Use the Shell Game to eliminate answer choices that are similar but slightly tweaked to be incorrect.
- Out of Scope Answers
Answer choices that are unrelated to the information in the stimulus; information that is tangential.
Cause
event that causes another event to happen.
Effect
event that follows from the occurrence of another event.
The _____________ must _____________ come before the effect.
The _____________ must ______________ come at some point __________ the _______________.
cause; always; effect; always; after; the cause.
“Last week, Apple announced a quarterly deficit and the stock market dropped 10 points. Thus, Apple’s announcement must have caused the drop.”
Explain why the Cause and Effect reasoning is faulty/dubious.
There’s any number of different events that could’ve caused the drop in the stock market, that could be completely separate from Apple’s announcement.
i.e.
war,
nationwide economic downturn,
recession,
or no trading in the market
As you’ll see, no two events stated in the stimulus must share ______________, though that’s what the author is trying to tell you. It could be that there is a ____________ relationship between the variables, a ________________ relationship (not causal), or even ____________.
causality; spurious; correlational; chance
Causality Indicators (not limited to this list, just have a gist of what’s said here).
- caused by
- determined by
- produced by
- because of
- responsible for
- reason for
- leads to
- induced by
- promoted by
- product of
- played a role in
- was a factor in
- is an effect of
The author will oftentimes try to assert _________________ in the ________________ of an argument (based on the ________________).
causality; conclusion; premises
How to Attack Basic Causal Conclusions:
A. Find an Alternate Cause for the Stated Effect. (AC)
The author believes there is only one cause to the stated effect.
Choosing the answer that illustrates a new, alternate cause having the same stated effect will weaken the author’s conclusion.
How to Attack Basic Causal Conclusions:
B. Cause Without Effect (C w/o E)
The author believes stated cause leads to an effect.
Answer choice where stated effect occurs but effect doesn’t weakens author’s conclusion.