Lesson Nine: Logical Reasoning and Logic Games Flashcards
– LOGICAL REASONING –
LSAT test makers use to their advantage a number of widely-accepted _________________ regarding ______________ and _____________ against test takers that you need to be aware of (namely 7)
misconceptions; numbers; percentages
Misconception #1:
Increasing percentages leads to increasing numbers.
Just because the percentage (of a given group of things in discussion) increases, does not mean that the numbers related to those percentages should have also increased.
Ex. Percentage of DUI related car crashes has increased from last year (10%), to this year (30%).
Imagine that the number of DUI related car crashes last year was 50, and this year is 20.
Perhaps the number of DUI related crashes went down as the number of all different car crashes went down, and DUI’s happen to be the larger portion of all crashes.
Misconception #2:
Decreasing percentages leads to decreasing numbers.
Opposite Misconception #1.
Just because the percentage (of a given group of things in discussion) decreases, that does not mean the number of things related to that percentage also decreases.
Ex. Let’s take the car crash example again and simply reverse it.
- The percentage of DUI related car crashes decreased from 30% last year, to 10% of all crashes this year.
- Now let’s say the NUMBER of DUI car crashes during last year was 20, and this year was 50.
- The reason we have a greater NUMBER of DUI crashes yet a lower PERCENTAGE is that other types of car crashes increased along with DUI cases, but the other types of crashes increased more, and so DUI cases make up a smaller slice of the pie.
Misconception #3:
Increasing numbers lead to increasing percentages.
This reverses the elements of the first two misconceptions.
Just because the number increases does not mean the percentage increases.
Ex. Let’s try a road accident example.
- The number of bicycle-related accidents has increased from 10 last year, to 30 this year.
- The number of total road-related accidents has increased from 100 last year, to 600 this year.
- Yet, the percentage of all bicycle - related accidents has decreased from 10% to 5%.
- We saw an increase in numbers, but not percentages, and this is because All types road related increased increased in number by 500. So while all types of road accidents had this huge increase, bicycle related accidents increased, but not as nearly as much, and so that’s going to be reflected as a significantly smaller percentage (slice of the pie).
Misconception #4:
Decreasing numbers lead to decreasing percentages.
Opposite Misconception #3:
Just because the number decreases does not mean the percentage of those things decrease.
- let’s take the road accidents example and reverse it.
- Number of bicycle related accidents decreased from 30 last year to 10 this year.
- Number of total road-related accidents decreased from 600 last year to 100 this
year. - Percentage of bicycle related accidents increased from 5% to 10%.
- There’s a decrease in numbers and an increase in percentage because all types of road accidents have decreased by 500 in number, while bicycle related accidents only decreased by 20 in number, as so that decrease is going to be reflected as a larger slice of the pie because they didn’t face near the decrease all other types of road accidents did.
Misconception #5:
Large numbers automatically means large percentages.
Just because you have a large number, doesn’t mean the percentage that large number constitutes is also large.
Ex. in 2017, Mercedes Benz sold 55,000 vehicles. 55,000 is a large number (nothing to be overlooked), yet that amount of car sales only made up 1/3 of 1% of all car sales that happen in 2017 (the total amount of car sales that year ended up being around 17 million).
Misconception #6:
Large percentages mean large numbers.
Large percentages do not automatically translate to having large numbers.
Just because you have large percentages does not mean you have large numbers.
Ex. 90% sounds like a quite large percentage. But 90% of $5, is not going to be a very large number.
Misconception #7:
Seeing reports of something and saying it corresponds to the overall number of occurrences of that thing.
Just because one thing, that is apart of family of things, occurs does not mean all things within that family correspond to the occurrences of that thing.
- Ex. “Violent crime in this town is becoming a serious problem. Compared to last year, local law enforcement agencies have responded to 17 percent more calls involving violent crimes, showing that the average citizen of this town is more likely than ever to become a victim of a violent crime.”
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
Between these two answers, which one do you think is right (and for what reasons), and which one commits the misconception (explain how it commits the misconception).
(B) In general, persons under the age of 65 are less likely to be victims of violent crimes than persons over the age of 65.
(C) As a result of the town’s community outreach programs, more people than ever are willing to report violent crimes to the proper authorities.
Answers:
(B) is wrong, and follows the misconception of seeing a report of something and saying is corresponds to the overall number of occurrences of that thing.
- 65 year old people are simply one class of people from the family that is “average citizens,” and this answer choice.
If we prephrase, we quickly realize the author is taking the increase in the number of calls to be consistent with a corresponding rise in crime. So, a weaken answer is one that shows the calls increasing without the crime increasing, and C was the closest answer choice to that.
You will see _____________ and ______________ in several if not most logical reasoning stimuli, so when you do, use knowledge of these _______________ to your advantage. Remember, the presence of ______________ and ______________ doesn’t take away from the fact that you’re still dealing with all the different question types you’ve encountered before (Must Be True, Must Be False, EXCEPT, strengthen, weaken etc…). So when this happens, use the same approach to these problems as you normally would, coupled with your knowledge on these ______________.
Ex. When attacking a Must Be True question, what test do we use to find the correct answer choice: ___________ ____________.
Ex. When finding the incorrect answer to a Must Be True question, we’re looking for answers that are…
- an _____________
- ______ __________
- ___________
- ___________
numbers; percentages; misconceptions; numbers; percentages; misconceptions; Fact Test; exaggeration; new info; reverse; opposite
– LOGIC GAMES –
Numerical Distributions
Numerical distributions are made by distributing one variables set over another.
(Numerical distributions usually take place with 2 variables sets only).
What is the “one-to-one” distribution?
when the number of variables (being allocated) = the number of slots available.
Ex.
“During a period of 6 consecutive days–Monday through Saturday–each of exactly six stores – B, C, D, E, F, G, and H will be reviewed. During this period, each of the stores will be reviewed exactly once, one store per day.”
- Each store is reviewed once, one store per day; so it’s quite easy to see the distribution here is 1-1-1-1-1-1.
- The Receiving variable set will be the 6 days (serving as the base; inherent order)
- The allocated variable set will be the six stores being reviewed : B, C, D, E, F, G, H
Most distributions are easy-to-understand and can be recognized fairly quickly without the need to write them down (specifically, one-to-one distribution). But, there will be games that present more _____________ situations in which you need to understand how to make these new distributions.
complex
Try an example problem:
“An office complex has 6 available offices spread over four different floors of the building. Each floor has either one or two available offices.”
Identify your receiving variable set /base.
Identify the variable set being placed in the receiving variable set.
The 6 available office spaces will be distributed across the four floors. So the 4 floors is your receiving set.
F1 F2 F3 F4
__ __ __ __
The six office spaces are the allocated variable set, we were told there will either be 1 or 2 offices on each floor. So we need a distribution of 1 office and 2 offices on each floor that will total the 6 minimum.
F1 F2 F3 F4
__ __ __ __ =
1 1 1 1 4
right now we have a minimum of four, we need more office spaces. And remember the rules. WE CAN ONLY HAVE ONE OR TWO OFFICE SPACES ON EACH FLOOR.
So the only thing we can do is distribute the 2 remaining spaces among the floors.
F1 F2 F3 F4
__ __ __ __ =
1 1 1 1 4
2 2 1 1 6
(2-2-1-1)