lecture 8- prosocial behaviour and moral reasoning Flashcards
what is eisenberg et al 2006’s description of prosociality
voluntarily behaviour intended to benefit another.
define altruism
motivated purely to help another at the cost of oneself
define prosociality
pattern of behaviour that occurs regardless of motivation.
what does evolutionary roots suggest about prosociality?
increase of survival of kin so more likely to assist genetically related individuals.
who supported the evolutionary perspective of prosocial
eisenberg 1983 found that 7-17 year olds were more likely to help friends and family and those with similar background.
is prosocial behaviour innate or learned
there is some evidence to suggest it is seen at an ealry age including twin studeis but we also know that parents and attachment types impact prosocial behavour.
dahl et al 2017- foudn that what increases prosocial behaviour
explicit scaffolding (provide gudance and support to help them learn a new skill).
who conducted an experiment into the roles of modelling on prosocial behaviour?
schumacher et al 2018
what did schumacher et al 2018 find?
observing helpful behaviour increases prosocial behaviour in infants- more likley to donate when they watch the model donate.
what is the issues with schumacher et al 2018’s study?
deception, is it really measuring prosocial behaviour- no effect of modelling after a 3 week follow up- were they just modelling expectations
how did zachary et al 1985’s findings challenge schumacher et al 2018
found that older children were only affect by experimenter influence rather than peer influence.
observation
zahn-wader et al 2001 found what regarding the relationship between mothers and infants
mothers responses to events in which negative emotions are expressed found that there is an increase in empathy with age.
observation
what did parents report in harmond and bromwell 2018’s study
parents reported helping behaviour in 1-4 year olds, found that helping increases with age.
warnecken and tomasello 2006 study did what
24 18m olds in 10 different situations in which an adult has trouble with a goal.
warnecken and tomasello 2006- results were what
6 of 10 tasks infants helped, 22 out of 24 helped out on at least 1. 84% within intial 10s never verbally prodded.