lecture 8- prosocial behaviour and moral reasoning Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is eisenberg et al 2006’s description of prosociality

A

voluntarily behaviour intended to benefit another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define altruism

A

motivated purely to help another at the cost of oneself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define prosociality

A

pattern of behaviour that occurs regardless of motivation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does evolutionary roots suggest about prosociality?

A

increase of survival of kin so more likely to assist genetically related individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

who supported the evolutionary perspective of prosocial

A

eisenberg 1983 found that 7-17 year olds were more likely to help friends and family and those with similar background.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

is prosocial behaviour innate or learned

A

there is some evidence to suggest it is seen at an ealry age including twin studeis but we also know that parents and attachment types impact prosocial behavour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

dahl et al 2017- foudn that what increases prosocial behaviour

A

explicit scaffolding (provide gudance and support to help them learn a new skill).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

who conducted an experiment into the roles of modelling on prosocial behaviour?

A

schumacher et al 2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what did schumacher et al 2018 find?

A

observing helpful behaviour increases prosocial behaviour in infants- more likley to donate when they watch the model donate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the issues with schumacher et al 2018’s study?

A

deception, is it really measuring prosocial behaviour- no effect of modelling after a 3 week follow up- were they just modelling expectations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how did zachary et al 1985’s findings challenge schumacher et al 2018

A

found that older children were only affect by experimenter influence rather than peer influence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

observation

zahn-wader et al 2001 found what regarding the relationship between mothers and infants

A

mothers responses to events in which negative emotions are expressed found that there is an increase in empathy with age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

observation

what did parents report in harmond and bromwell 2018’s study

A

parents reported helping behaviour in 1-4 year olds, found that helping increases with age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

warnecken and tomasello 2006 study did what

A

24 18m olds in 10 different situations in which an adult has trouble with a goal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

warnecken and tomasello 2006- results were what

A

6 of 10 tasks infants helped, 22 out of 24 helped out on at least 1. 84% within intial 10s never verbally prodded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

factors

what do mothers do when a child is helpful

A

less likely to not respond when a child is helpful and for the opposite they tend to do moral extortation.

17
Q

factors

what is the role of parents in helping behaviour within children

A

secure attachment is associated with higher empahty. thereofre parents who are empathetic tend to encourage empathy.

18
Q

what is the role of perspective taking and emotional regulation in prosocial behaviour?

A

the prosocial behaviour may be because they are upset when someone else is upset- when young their is a montage effect.

19
Q

what was piaget’s theory

A

children understood rules of the game which corresponds to rules of socety.

20
Q

what are the 3 stages of understanding ?

A

premoral (up to 4), moral realism (4-10) rules come from higher authority, moral subjectivism (10+).

21
Q

what was the results of piaget’s dilemma method?

A

up to 9/10 children judge based on amount of damage and not motive

22
Q

who expanded on piaget’s theory by writing new dilemmas

A

kohlberg.