Lecture 4 - Social judgements Flashcards
cognitive misers
we’re lazy when we judge others and evalute social situations
benefits of heuristics
fast
efficient
often correct
drawbacks of heurstics
often incorrect
hard to correct
implicit personality theory
based in first impressions
“what is someone like”
assigning traits
associations with insecurity
shy
incompetnent
dishonest
associations with outgoing
kind
competent
honest
Rosenham
false participants in psychiatry
nearly all diagnosed with schizophrenia
follow-up study: real patients were rejected although all were real
two dimensions of social perception
warmth: moral, kind, helpful
competence: intelligent, skilled, capable
classify 80% of stereotype content
high warmth
when competent: pride, admiration
not competent: sympathy and pity
low warmth
when competent: envy, jealousy
not competent: disgust
aspects of non-verbal behaviour
body posture
facial expressions
gestures
chameleon effect
mimikry of behaviour
salience cues characterisitcs
attention grabbing
often interpreted as causal
dominate other cues
how cues get connected
similar meaning
co-occurence
how is behaviour interpreted
mood
expectations
myth of self-interest
overestimating self-interest as motive for behaviour
strongest for powerful people
correspondent inferences
behaviour interpreted as reflecting how someone is like
fundamental attribution error
underestimating situation
overestimating intention
ascribing cause
attributing to accessbile and salient cues
biases in person perception
we see the person as most influential that is the most visble
causal attribution
Kelleys’s attribution theory
all behaviour can be explained by actor, stimulus and situaition
Kelley’s cubus model
- distinctiveness: behaviour specific to stimulus
- consistency: repeated over time to same stimulus
- consensus: other behave the same way
effect of cognitive load
more stereotyping
discounting
less internal attribution
augmenting
more internal attribution
probability of co-occurence of two things
always lower than just one thing
conjunction fallacy
description matches stereotype perfectly, therefore we ignore actual probabilities
halo effect
someone is good looking, he must be a good person
self-fulfilling prophecy
expectations become true because they change behaviour
telephone experiment
woman that is described as attractive is treated better therefore is perceived as more attractive by blind listener
anchoring heuristic
first information serves as anchor for everything following
availability heursistic
it is easy to come up with examples, therefore it must be right
hind sight bias
when it already has happened, you say you saw it coming
counterfactual thinking
missing a train by 2 minutes feels worse than missing it by 30 minutes although outcome is the same
which medalist feels best
gold, second is bronze