Lecture 4 Flashcards
Sexual selection was initially described by who
Sexual selection was initially described by Darwin
what does sexual selection come from
Arises from the observation that many animals develop features whose function is not to improve survival but to maximize their reproductive success
does sexual selection always increase survival
in some cases, the feature may actually decrease survival, while still improving fitness because it increases reproduction
what is Intrasexual selection (within a sex)
individuals intimidate, deter or defeat same-sex rivals:
territory defence
fighting or other direct competition
what is Intersexual selection (between the sexes)
individuals make themselves more attractive to the opposite sex
mate choice/mate preferences
In general, selection can act not just on morphology, but also on_____
In general, selection can act not just on morphology, but also on behaviour
give an example of sexual selection
Females preferentially mate with large clawed males
Over time (generations) this will skew the population toward larger claws
Any mutation that allows for even larger claws will thrive
Female preferences for larger claws drives an increase in claw size
Natural selection may limit increase in claw size
the crab with the claw too large will be eliminated because now they cant escape from predators, get food, dig a borrow, etc… even though the females prefer the larger claws… so they will end up eliminated
natural selection puts a limit on the distribution
how does sexual selection stay in line
sexual selection pushes against natural selection and vice versa
so this explains how we might end up with such elaborate traits, but it doesn’t explain how it would get started
what are some questions remaining
Why are there preferences?
Why does one sex tend to be choosy?
who is the flashy sex
The flashy sex: whichever sex has greater VARIANCE (or SKEW) in reproduction will evolve more elaborate traits
where is the mean on a graph
the mean is were half of the points are above and half are below (dotted line)
what does the variance tell us on a graph
the variance tells us about the width of the distribution (the width)
what does the skew tell us on a graph
the skew tells us about the shape of the distribution (the shape wont always have the normal distribution (bell curve))
The greater the variance, the _____ apart the extremes are
The greater the variance, the farther apart the extremes are
The greater the skew, the ______ asymmetric the distribution
The greater the skew, the more asymmetric the distribution(if it is sort of mushed to one side or the other… blue curve)
if the average reproduction success is equal (every offspring has a mother and father)
what is the reproduction skew like
average reproduction success is equal (every offspring has a mother and father)
reproductive skew is high for males because some males mate, some do not
if the average reproduction success is equal (every offspring has a mother and father)
what is the variance like
reproductive variance is similar because males and females form pairs, work together
what are the 3 situations/possibilities that sexual selection can result in
everyone gets to mate and variance is very small
some mate and some don’t (males) but all female mate (with only a select few males) so this is skewed so we have more variance in males (more flashy)
some mate and some don’t (females) but all males mate (with only a select few females) so this is skewed and we have more variance in females (more flashy)
who has more investment, typically
By virtue of the size and content of eggs vs. sperm, it is often thought that females have a greater investment in reproduction
There are definitely more convincing examples of females having greater investment, in particular in species where there is greater MATERNAL than PATERNAL care
are mammals more flashy
Here, I should point out that in mammals males might not be more “flashy” but rather be bigger and more aggressive and territorial
what did Bateman hypothesize
that there was a relationship between mating success and reproductive success
And that this relationship could differ between males and females
what does Bateman’s Gradient say
In species where investment might limit the reproductive output of females but not males, mating more frequently doesn’t improve reproductive success for females, but it would for males
Predicts that sexual selection will be stronger on males
In species where investment might limit the reproductive output of males
Predicts that sexual selection will be stronger on females
The flashy sex: whichever sex has ______-
Greater VARIANCE or REPRODUCTIVE SKEW (some males mate, some do not) Or, for biparental species for example, a steeper BATEMAN’S GRADIENT
Females that are not able to increase reproductive success with additional mating may be able to improve the quality of offspring (and therefore their reproductive success) by choosing doing what
Females that are not able to increase reproductive success with additional mating may be able to improve the quality of offspring (and therefore their reproductive success) by choosing a better mate
is Reproductive success measured only y the number of offspring
Reproductive success is influenced not only by the number of children a female has but also the number of grandchildren, great grandchildren, etc is influenced not only by the number of children a female has but also the number of grandchildren, great grandchildren, etc
so what makes a better mate
theories include;
Sexy Sons (also known as Fisher’s runaway selection model):
Good Genes/Immunocompetence hypothesis
Pre-existing sensory Bias and Sensory exploitation
what is Sexy Sons (also known as Fisher’s runaway selection model):
In a population, females show a preference for a particular character (and mate with males displaying that character)
The sons of those females will display that character
The daughters of those females will display the preference
Over time, the preference and the trait will become genetically coupled
And may continue to co-evolve (males produce more elaborate versions of the trait, females prefer more elaborate versions of the trait)
This hypothesis is thought to produce extreme traits that are contrary to (and eventually limited by) natural selection
what is Good Genes/Immunocompetence hypothesis
William Hamilton and Marlene Zuk, 1982:
Some males are genetically more resistant to parasites or infection
Those males would survive longer and have more offspring
AND they would be less likely to infect females
AND their offspring would also survive longer, reproduce more
Males produce a trait that signals their health or vigor
Females prefer males which display that trait
There are many steps to demonstrate this:
Parasites are costly
Heritable variation in immunity
Ornaments depend on the parasite
Females choose males with fewer parasites
But there is some support of this hypothesis in a handful of species
what is Pre-existing sensory Bias and Sensory exploitation
Michael Ryan, 1990
Females have a bias for particular types of sensory stimuli (e.g. particular colors or sounds). These biases result from the way that their brain is set up and has evolved for reasons outside of sexual selection (for example, for foraging)
Males produce a signal that stimulates that part of the female sensory system and females preferentially mate with males producing the signal
how is Pre-existing sensory Bias and Sensory exploitation entirely different from that of the good gene and runaway hypotheses
The preference and trait do not evolve in concert (no co-evolution)
The signal doesn’t indicate anything about the “quality” of the male