Lecture 4 Flashcards
Fearon and Laitin Week
what do fearon and laitin consider to be robust predictors of civil war
- state institutional capacity and strength, and most importantly per capita income are robust
- ethnic and cultural diversity have little predictive power
what do collier and hoeffler consider to be robust predictors of civil war
economic opportunities - maybe greed-motivated - as well as military and financial feasibility most strongly predict whether civil war occurs, while grievance does not
why are there different conclusions of studies adopt the same empirical strategy (5 things)
- different interpretations to key variables like per capita income, opportunity cost for potential rebels v. correlation with state capacity
- different coding for civil wars onset
- estimates are sensitive to the explanatory variables employed
- inconsistency lies in the somewhat ad hoc empirical models
- the country level of analysis has inherent limitations
three main challenges with conflict research
- search for exogeneity: income and conflict suffer from reversal causality - econometric method
- more detailed and theoretically motivated measurement for natural resources in particular
- integration with case studies / going beyond the nation state
conceptualization of the causes and triggers of conflict based on
- macro causes of conflict
- micro-level evidence on the causes of conflict
examples of macro causes of conflict
- low national incomes are almost always associated with the occurrence of civil wars
- factors that facilitate insurgencies: mountains and forests
- natural resources (mixed evidence)
- empirical cross-sectional literature finds no empirical evidence for grievances
examples of micro causes of conflict
- the roots of individual participation in armed groups
- the role of internal geography in influencing where and when civil conflicts are fought
- the organization and conduct of conflict
traits of lasting wars
- involve guerilla movements
- conflicts over land or natural resources by ethnic groups
- rebels financed through opium, diamonds or coca
- a few large ethnic groups (polarization)
- large forest cover
- presence of weak state institutions
- mixed evidence on external intervention
the resource curse
states that are rich in natural resources tend to show higher levels of conflict
climate change and conflict
- some research has shown that higher temperatures and decreased rainfall tend to increase violence in subsequent years
- weather shocks can also lead to growth in GDP for countries that rely on rain fed agri
- there is a relationship but dispute remains about its magnitude