Lecture 3 Flashcards

Lowkey Sambanis

1
Q

the four impacts of coding rules on conflict conceptualization

A
  • look at the operational definition of civil war
  • provide insights into our ability to measure civil war and distinguish it from other forms of political violence
  • stress the importance to know if our understanding of civil war is affected by different coding rules
  • avoid the risk of making inferences from unstable empirical results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does Sambanis say about civil war

A

that it is distinguished from other forms of internal armed conflict by the requirement that state violence should be sustained and reciprocated and that the war exceeds a certain threshold of deaths (typically one thousand)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

4 challenges that Sambanis’ paper brings up

A
  • it is often difficult to distinguish extrastate from intrastate wars
  • what degree of organization to distinguish a civil war from one-sided, state sponsored violence
  • with a numerical threshold of deaths to identify wars, how do we deal with the problem of unreliable reporting and incomplete data
  • given that violence during civil war is typically intermittent, how do we determine when an old war stops and a new one starts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how many qualifiers does Sambanis have for Civil War onset

A

11

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

sambanis version A coding

A

code a 1 when a civil war starts and drop observations of ongoing war in that country until the war ends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

sambanis version B coding

A

code a 1 whenever a war starts even if another war is ongoing - country years with no new war starts are coded 0 and in this war, we end up with more war starts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sambanis results with variables leading to civil war omset

A

the results presented in Tables 2, 4, 6 suggest wide ranging agreement on the robustness of most other variables used in civil war models, especially when we consider the truncated period analyzed in table 2 and 4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

findings for oil exports, ethnic heterogeneity, and war in the previous period

A

they are the most significant differences with the coding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

findings for mountainous terrain

A

significant for collier and hoeffler, but is not a robust measure for civil war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

percentage of muslims finding

A

there is no robust association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

findings of GDP growth

A

generally not significant and may well be endogenous to levels of violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

findings of ethnic fractionalization

A

very sensitive to coding rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how does sambanis define prevalence

A

as the union of onset and continuation of war so the dependent variable is coded 1 for all periods of war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what type of model does sambanis use

A

Dynamic Probit models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

three conclusions for Sambanis

A
  • demonstrate that there are substantial differences across civil war lists with respect to the coding of the onset and termination of civil war
  • offer a new coding rule for civil war
  • measure the substantive implications of differences in coding rules by formally comparing the empirical results using 12 different coding rules
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly