Aid Under Fire: Development Projects and Civil Conflict Flashcards

Crost et al

1
Q

existing research around aid is

A

mixed, there are different conclusions on the impact of aid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

aid is a ___ force in conflicts

A

stabilizing
- sudden reductions in aid can cause violent conflict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

US food aid promotes

A

civil conflict on average, through prolongation of the conflict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the consensus is that the effectiveness of aid is

A

heavily dependent on the nature of the aid that is being delivered, and the manner of implementation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the three conditions for aid

A
  • aid spending should be small, conditional, secure, and informed
  • engage in developmental expertise, aware of the situation
  • train people to implement local service provision
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the research question for Crost et al

A

What is causal effect of the KALAHI-CIDDS community driven development program (CDD) on civil conflicts deaths in the Philippines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

hypothesis for crost et al

A

insurgents try to sabotage the program for political reasons, as a successful implementation will weaken their support from the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

significance of Crost et al

A
  • important implications on how aid programs should be designed so as not to intensify conflict
  • addressing the importance of the process of aid distribution in determining an improvement or worsening of the situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the KALAHI-CIDDS program

A
  • community driven development program in the Philippines, funded by the World Bank and implemented domestically by the Philippine government
    the largest development program in the Philippines during its 2003-2008 period of implementation: more than 4000 villages in 184 municipalities across 42 provinces
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

four stages of the KALAHI-CIDSS program

A
  • preprogram: 12 months before the start of social preparation
  • social preparation phase: 6 months at the beginning of program
  • remaining program period: 3 years after the social preparation phase
  • entire program period: all three previous periodsa
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what design does the crost et al paper use

A

regression discontinuity design: exploits an arbitrary poverty threshold used to assign eligibility for the program

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does the regression discontinuity design do

A
  • compares conflict levels of municipalities around the arbitrary threshold of poverty for the CDD
  • allows us to estimate the causal impact of the development program on conflict
  • a municipality that is the poorest quartile of its province gets the program
  • they are then ranked relative to the poverty cutoff for the CDD program
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

the effect of eligibility on participation for crost

A
  • poor municipalities have higher probability to participate
  • probability participation decreases sharply across the eligibility threshold
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

during the social prep phase what happens to the casualties / per month

A

rises before the CDD and the drops

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

robustness tests for continuity of observables across the threshold

A

under the identifying assumption of the RD estimator - that assignment close to the threshold is as good as random - the control variables do not change discontinuously across the threshold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

four conclusions of crost et al

A
  • the study provides evidence that a large scale community driven development program in the Philippines caused an increase in conflict casualties
  • the effect was concentrated in the program’s early stages: before funds were disbursed and before eligible municipalities committed
  • the increase in casualties was strongest among government forces suffering insurgent initiated attacks
  • similar effects were observed in conflicts with both the communist New People’s Army, and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, while no observable impact on conflicts involving non-political armed criminal groups
17
Q

key takeaway from crost

A

the results support the hypothesis that insurgents sabotaged the program to protect their political position and maintain popular support