Learning and Memory Prpjet Flashcards
Pavlov found that requiring dogs to make difficult discriminations between similar stimuli caused which of the following? A. superstitious behavior B. overshadowing C. latent inhibition D. experimental neurosis
Answer D is correct. While conducting studies on stimulus discrimination, Pavlov found that requiring the dogs to make difficult discriminations caused them to become extremely agitated and uncharacteristically aggressive, and he referred to these behaviors as experimental neurosis.
Classical Conditioning Procedure
Classical conditioning helps explain involuntary, automatic responses to stimuli.
Classical Conditioning Procedure: Classical conditioning was initially described by Ivan Pavlov, and his most famous studies involved training dogs to respond to a ringing bell with salivation. In these studies, meat powder was an unconditioned stimulus (US) because it automatically elicited the unconditioned response (UR) of salivation from the dogs. The ringing bell began as a neutral stimulus because it did not automatically elicit salivation; however, after being repeatedly presented with meat power, the ringing bell became a conditioned stimulus (CS) that elicited a conditioned response (CR) of salivation when presented alone.
The magnitude of a CR is always less than the magnitude of the UR. It’s affected, however, by the number of times the CS and US are paired during conditioning trials, with the magnitude increasing (up to a point) as the number of pairings increases. In addition, the strength and speed of acquisition of a CR depend on the procedure that’s used: (a) When using delay conditioning, presentation of the CS precedes and overlaps presentation of the US. Of the conditioning procedures, delay conditioning is most effective, and a delay of about one-half second between presentation of the CS and US is optimal. (b) When using trace conditioning, the CS is presented and terminated just before the US is presented. (c) When using simultaneous conditioning, the CS and US are presented and terminated at about the same time. (d) When using backward conditioning, the US is presented before the CS. Backward conditioning is usually ineffective, which suggests that it’s the contingency of stimuli (i.e., that the occurrence of the US depends on the occurrence of the CS) that accounts for classical conditioning.
Classical Extinction
Classical Extinction: Classical extinction occurs when, after the CS is repeatedly presented without the US, the CS no longer produces a CR.
Spontaneous Recovery
Spontaneous Recovery: Spontaneous recovery occurs when a CR returns after it was apparently extinguished. According to Pavlov, spontaneous recovery confirms that an extinguished CR is suppressed rather than eliminated.
The most effective conditioning procedure is \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ conditioning. A. simultaneous B. backward C. delay D. trace
Answer C is correct. Of the conditioning procedures, delay conditioning is most effective and involves presenting the CS so that it precedes and overlaps presentation of the US
Stimulus Discrimination
Stimulus Discrimination: Stimulus discrimination is the opposite of stimulus generalization and is the ability to discriminate between the CS and similar stimuli. Pavlov found that, when dogs were exhibiting stimulus generalization, they could be taught to discriminate between similar stimuli. For example, if a dog was conditioned to salivate in response to a 2000-Hz tone and subsequently also salivated in response to a 2100-Hz tone, discrimination training would involve repeatedly presenting the 2000-Hz tone with meat powder and the 2100-Hz tone without meat powder. As the result of this discrimination training, the dog would be able to discriminate between the two stimuli and salivate only in response to the 2000-Hz tone.
While conducting studies on stimulus discrimination, Pavlov found that requiring dogs to make difficult discriminations had unexpected consequences. For example, in one study, Pavlov attempted to train dogs to salivate in response to a circle but not to ellipses. When discrimination became very difficult (when an ellipse was very similar to a circle), the dogs became extremely agitated and uncharacteristically aggressive. Pavlov referred to these unusual behaviors as experimental neurosis and concluded that they were caused by a conflict between excitatory and inhibitory processes in the central nervous system.
Pavlov found that a CS elicits:
A. a similar amount of salivation as the US regardless of the conditioning procedure used.
B. a slightly greater amount of salivation than the US when delay conditioning was used.
C. a smaller amount of salivation than the US regardless of the conditioning procedure used.
D. a smaller or larger amount of salivation than the US, depending on which conditioning procedure used.
Answer C is correct. Pavlov found that a CS (e.g., a ringing bell) always elicited a response of less intensity or magnitude than the response elicited by the US (e.g., meat powder) regardless of the number of pairings of the CS and US or which conditioning procedure was used.
One explanation for \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ is that the second neutral stimulus does not provide any new information about the occurrence of the unconditioned stimulus. A. stimulus discrimination B. blocking C. latent inhibition D. higher-order conditioning
Answer B is correct. According to Rescorla and Wagner (1972), blocking occurs because the initial neutral stimulus (the conditioned stimulus) already predicts the occurrence of the unconditioned stimulus. Consequently, an association between the second neutral stimulus and the US is not made because the second neutral stimulus provides redundant information about the US.
When using second-order conditioning:
A. the CS acts as a US.
B. the US acts as a CS.
C. the CS is presented with more than one US.
D. stimuli similar to the original CS are paired with the US.
Answer A is correct. Second-order conditioning involves using the initial CS (e.g., a ringing bell) as a US by pairing it with a second neutral stimulus (e.g., a blinking light) so that the second neutral stimulus also becomes a CS and elicits a CR (e.g., salivation) when presented alone.
Latent Inhibition
Latent Inhibition: Latent inhibition occurs when pre-exposure to a neutral stimulus alone on multiple occasions prior to conditioning trials reduces the likelihood that the stimulus will become a CS and elicit a CR when it’s subsequently paired with a US.
Higher-Order Conditioning
Higher-Order Conditioning: Higher-order conditioning involves treating a CS (e.g., a ringing bell) as an unconditioned stimulus and pairing it with a neutral stimulus (e.g., a blinking light) so that the neutral stimulus also becomes a CS and elicits the CR (e.g., salivation) when presented alone. Note that, when higher-order conditioning involves a second CS, it’s also referred to as second-order conditioning; when it involves a third CS, it’s also referred to as third-order conditioning; etc.
Compound Conditioning
Compound Conditioning: Compound conditioning occurs when two or more stimuli are presented together and includes blocking and overshadowing. Blocking occurs when conditioning trials are first used to establish an association between one neutral stimulus (e.g., a ringing bell) and a US (e.g., meat powder) by repeatedly pairing presentation of the neutral stimulus with the US. Then, when the neutral stimulus becomes a CS and elicits a CR when presented alone, it’s repeatedly presented simultaneously with a second neutral stimulus (e.g., a flashing light) just before presenting the US. In this situation, classical conditioning of the first neutral stimulus blocks classical conditioning of the second neutral stimulus, and the second neutral stimulus never becomes a CS. Blocking occurs apparently because the second neutral stimulus does not provide any new information about the occurrence of the US (Rescorla & Wagner, 1972).
Overshadowing occurs when two neutral stimuli are, from the start, repeatedly presented together before the US. In this situation, the two stimuli will elicit a CR when presented together; however, when each stimulus is presented alone, the more salient (stronger) stimulus produces a CR, but the less salient (weaker) stimulus does not. The research has found that this occurs even when the less salient stimulus can become a CS when it’s paired by itself with the US. In other words, the failure of the less salient stimulus to become a CS is not due to its low salience but to being overshadowed by the more salient stimulus when the two stimuli are presented together during conditioning trials
Interventions That Use Extinction
Interventions based on classical conditioning decrease or eliminate an undesirable behavior using extinction or counterconditioning.
Interventions That Use Extinction: Interventions that use classical extinction to alter a behavior include exposure with response prevention, cue exposure therapy, implosive therapy, and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing.
- Exposure with Response Prevention: Exposure with response prevention uses classical extinction to eliminate an anxiety response and is based on two assumptions. The first assumption is that anxiety-arousing stimuli that do not ordinarily elicit anxiety (e.g., elevators, crowds, white rats) become conditioned stimuli and begin to elicit anxiety because, at some time in the past, they were paired with an unconditioned stimulus that naturally elicited anxiety. The second assumption is that the conditioned fear response never extinguishes because the person avoids the conditioned stimulus in order to avoid experiencing fear. As an example, a person who has a fear of elevators may have acquired this fear because he was in an elevator when there was an earthquake that automatically elicited a fear response. In this situation, the elevator was the CS and the earthquake was the US and, as a result of the pairing of the CS and US and subsequent stimulus generalization, the person is now afraid of all elevators. In this situation, the person always takes the stairs instead of the elevator to avoid feeling fear, which deprives him of opportunities for extinguishing his conditioned fear response. When using exposure with response prevention, the client is exposed to the feared (conditioned) stimulus while preventing the client from making his/her usual avoidance response. As a result, the conditioned response is extinguished.
Exposure with response prevention can be conducted in vivo (in real life settings), in virtual reality, or in imagination, and it can take the form of flooding or graded exposure: Flooding involves sustained exposure to stimuli that elicit the most intense levels of anxiety during all exposure sessions, while graded exposure (also known as graduated exposure) involves progressive exposure to anxiety-arousing stimuli, beginning with the least anxiety-arousing stimulus and gradually progressing to stimuli that produce increasingly greater levels of anxiety. Although flooding can be effective (especially for treating agoraphobia), graded exposure is more acceptable to clients who resist experiencing high levels of anxiety. Also, to be effective, each exposure session should not end until the client has experienced a substantial decrease in anxiety (Clark & Beck, 2010).
Exposure with Response Prevention
Exposure with Response Prevention: Exposure with response prevention uses classical extinction to eliminate an anxiety response and is based on two assumptions. The first assumption is that anxiety-arousing stimuli that do not ordinarily elicit anxiety (e.g., elevators, crowds, white rats) become conditioned stimuli and begin to elicit anxiety because, at some time in the past, they were paired with an unconditioned stimulus that naturally elicited anxiety. The second assumption is that the conditioned fear response never extinguishes because the person avoids the conditioned stimulus in order to avoid experiencing fear. As an example, a person who has a fear of elevators may have acquired this fear because he was in an elevator when there was an earthquake that automatically elicited a fear response. In this situation, the elevator was the CS and the earthquake was the US and, as a result of the pairing of the CS and US and subsequent stimulus generalization, the person is now afraid of all elevators. In this situation, the person always takes the stairs instead of the elevator to avoid feeling fear, which deprives him of opportunities for extinguishing his conditioned fear response. When using exposure with response prevention, the client is exposed to the feared (conditioned) stimulus while preventing the client from making his/her usual avoidance response. As a result, the conditioned response is extinguished.
Exposure with response prevention can be conducted in vivo (in real life settings), in virtual reality, or in imagination, and it can take the form of flooding or graded exposure: Flooding involves sustained exposure to stimuli that elicit the most intense levels of anxiety during all exposure sessions, while graded exposure (also known as graduated exposure) involves progressive exposure to anxiety-arousing stimuli, beginning with the least anxiety-arousing stimulus and gradually progressing to stimuli that produce increasingly greater levels of anxiety. Although flooding can be effective (especially for treating agoraphobia), graded exposure is more acceptable to clients who resist experiencing high levels of anxiety. Also, to be effective, each exposure session should not end until the client has experienced a substantial decrease in anxiety (Clark & Beck, 2010).
Cue Exposure Therapy
Cue Exposure Therapy: Cue exposure therapy (CET) is a type of exposure with response prevention that’s used to treat substance use disorders. It involves exposing a client to cues (conditioned stimuli) associated with a substance while prohibiting him/her from using the substance. Doing so weakens the strength of the relationship between the cues and substance use, apparently as the result of extinction or habituation (Sher, Talley, Littlefield, & Martinez, 2011). Cues include internal and external triggers for substance use such as craving for the substance, interpersonal conflicts, and the sight of the substance. CET is often effective when used alone, but there’s evidence that its effectiveness increases when it’s combined with training in coping strategies to use when faced with cues, such as reminding oneself about the negative consequences of substance use and engaging in alternative activities (Spiegler, 2015).
Implosive Therapy
Implosive Therapy: Implosive therapy (Stampfl & Levis, 1967) is a type of exposure that’s always conducted in imagination and incorporates psychodynamic elements. When using implosive therapy, the therapist encourages the client to exaggerate his/her image of the feared object or event in order to elicit a high level of anxiety and embellishes the scene being imagined by the client with psychodynamic conflicts that are believed to underlie the client’s anxiety (e.g., conflicts related to sexuality, hostility, or rejection).
EMDR
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR): EMDR was originally developed as an intervention for PTSD (Shapiro, 2001) but is now also used to treat phobias and several other disorders. It combines exposure to trauma-related imagery, exposure to negative cognitions related to the feared event, rehearsal of adaptive cognitions, and rapid lateral eye movements, and it’s based on the assumption that eye movements facilitate the mental processing of traumatic memories. Despite evidence for its effectiveness, it’s not clear if the beneficial effects of EMDR depend on eye movements. Based on their meta-analysis of the research, Davidson and Parker (2013) conclude that eye movements do not add to the effectiveness of EMDR and that its benefits are due to repeated exposure to the feared event. In contrast, other investigators have argued that exposure does not adequately explain its effects (e.g., Rogers & Silver, 2002).
Interventions That Use Counterconditioning
Interventions That Use Counterconditioning: These interventions include systematic desensitization and aversion therapy.
- Systematic Desensitization: Systematic desensitization was developed by Joseph Wolpe as a treatment for phobic anxiety and involves three steps: (1) The client learns deep muscle relaxation or other procedure that produces a state of relaxation. (2) The client and therapist create an anxiety hierarchy, which is a list of stimuli that cause low to high levels of anxiety. (3) The client imagines the stimuli included the hierarchy and uses the relaxation procedure while doing so. This step begins with the least anxiety-arousing stimulus and, once the client can maintain a relaxed state while imagining that stimulus, he or she imagines the next stimulus in the hierarchy and practices the relaxation procedure while doing so. This procedure continues until the client can maintain a relaxed state while imagining the most anxiety-arousing stimulus.
As described by Wolpe, systematic desensitization uses counterconditioning (which he referred to as reciprocal inhibition) and involves replacing an undesirable anxiety response with an incompatible and more desirable relaxation response. From this perspective, the anxiety-arousing stimulus is the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the procedure that naturally produces relaxation is the unconditioned stimulus (US); and, as a result of pairing presentation of the CS and US, the CS produces relaxation rather than anxiety. Research using the dismantling strategy (which involves comparing the individual components of a treatment) has found, however, that the effectiveness of systematic desensitization is due to classical extinction. From this perspective, anxiety-arousing stimuli are conditioned stimuli that, at some time in the past, were paired with an unconditioned stimulus that naturally produced anxiety, and systematic desensitization extinguishes the anxiety response to these stimuli by repeatedly presenting them without that unconditioned stimulus.
- Aversion Therapy: Aversion therapy is also known as aversive counterconditioning and is used to treat addictions and other self-reinforcing behaviors. When using aversion therapy, stimuli associated with the problem behavior are paired with an unconditioned stimulus that naturally produces an unpleasant response that’s incompatible with the reinforcing response. As a result, stimuli associated with the problem behavior become conditioned stimuli and produce the unpleasant response rather than the self-reinforcing response. For example, when aversion therapy is used to treat a client’s fetish, presentation of the fetish object might be paired with electric shock to the client’s arm. In this situation, the fetish object is the CS, the electric shock is the US, and the pain caused by the electric shock is the UR. As the result of pairing the fetish object with electric shock, the fetish object produces a conditioned response (CR) of pain rather than sexual arousal.
When aversion therapy is conducted in imagination rather than in vivo (with real stimuli), it’s known as covert sensitization. When using covert sensitization, sessions often end by having the client imagine a relief scene. This involves having the client imagine facing a stimulus associated with the problem behavior but refraining from engaging in the behavior and, as a result, experiencing a sense of relief or other positive sensation.