Law and Justice Flashcards
Trial Courts
-Listen to testimony
-Hear evidence
-Decide the facts in disputed situations
2 Main Types of Courts
Trial Courts and Appeal Courts
Appeal Courts
Courts that hear appeals from lower courts:
-NO new evidence
-NO new testimony
-Decide whether the lower courts issued a fair trial
2 Types of Trials
Civil Trials and Criminal Trials
5 Aspects of Civil Trials:
Initiated By: A citizen against another citizen
Intent/Outcomes: Collect Damages ($$$)
Burden of Proof: More likely guilty than not guilty
Witness/Testimony: Anyone
Jury/Lawyers: No jury and no lawyers; judge questions plaintiff, defendant, and witnesses who testify
5 Aspects of Criminal Trials
Intent/Outcomes: Prove someone is guilty of committing a crime
Initiated By: Government against a citizen
Witness/Testimony: Select individuals (victim, bystanders, the accused sometimes (5th Am.))
Jury/Lawyers: Have Lawyers and Juries; Lawyers do questioning, judges keep order
Burden of Proof: High: “Beyond a reasonable doubt”
Adversarial System:
Role of Judge: Don’t do questioning (done by lawyers); keep order
Role of Parties: Active; full control over proceedings; prepare their cases
Legal Representation: Lawyers: vital; handle case preparations, question witnesses
Rules of Ev/Proc.: Strict rules of evidence, fair and unbiased
Standard and B.o.P: Criminal Case: “Beyond Reasonable Doubt”
Civil Case: More likely guilty than not guilty
Wants: Justice
Common In: Criminal Cases, U.S.
Inquisitorial System
Role of Judge: Handle all questioning/proceedings, decide verdict, no lawyers/jury usually
Role of Parties: Answer questioning, prepare their own cases, present evidence
Legal Rep.: Usually none
Rules of Ev./Proc: Not strict; looks at all evidence no matter how it was found
Burden of Proof: Not as strict; “More likely than not”
Common in: Civil trials, Europe
Wants: Truth
Advantages/Disadvantages of Adversarial System:
-Slower
-More favorable for the accused; PROTECTS RIGHTS
Advantages/Disadvantages of Inquisitorial System:
-Faster
-More favorable for the accuser; less focused on rights of the accused
-Finds the truth
Jurisdiction
The authority of a court to hear a case
Original jurisdiction
The case is being heard for the first time in a court
Appellate jurisdiction
When courts hear appeals from lower courts:
-No new evidence/testimony
-Decide whether the lower court(s) provided a fair & unbiased trial
North Dakota Courts:
Level 3: Municipal Courts:
-Jurisdiction over city ordinances
-90 in ND (over 5,000 pop.)
-Only Og. Jurisdiction since nothing is below them
Level 2: District Courts:
-8 Judicial Districts
-52 judges w/ 6-year terms
-Og. and App. jurisdiction
Level 1: Supreme Court:
-5 justices elected to 10 yr. terms
-Og. and Appellate jurisdiction
Federal Court Levels:
Level 3: District Courts:
-94 in nation
-Judges are nominated by Pres. and confirmed by Majority of Senate
-Only Og. Jurisdiction
-Bankruptcy, civil rights, public lands, fraud, tax evasion, etc…
Level 2: Court of Appeals:
-12 regional circuits
-3 judges and no jury
-Only appellate jurisdiction
-Judges nominated/ confirmed
Level 1: U.S. Supreme Court
-9 Justices app./confirmed
-Og. and App. jurisdiction
-Can’t appeal verdict without a whole new case