L25 QTL mapping in inbred populations Flashcards
Quantitative Trait Loci mapping consists of…
identifying the genetic position of loci involved in quantitative trait variation and estimate their effects
- position
- magnitude of effect
QTL mapping allowed the fusion of molecular are quantitative genetics
Two main sets of resources were developed to identify the molecular basis of quantitative trait variation
- inbred lines (cross) through linkage mapping (tracking along family pedigree)
- outbred lines through Association mapping (using natural population)
Linkage mapping with a single marker
see onenote
Construct a genetic map:
- calculate linkage between markers
- assembling markers into linkage groups
the limiting factor is more the number of genotypes generated int he cross rather than the number of markers
Step-wise test of the marker effect
see onenote
Testing each marker independently
see onenote
Neutral marker
see onenote
a marker is by definition neutral
not the gene/allele responsible for the genetic effect
a marker potentially co-segregates with the gene (s) underlying the QTL
QTL mapping determines the position(s) on the genetic map where the markers show the strongest linkage with the phenotype
Interval mapping between markers
see onenote
no exam questions for slide 15 to 19
find the probability/frequency of each gamete type
Recombination between the two markers = r
Recombination between between marker and QTL = rA and rB
Interval mapping leads to joint estimates of:
- genetic effect
- position of QTL (+ confidence interval)
Rise and fall of QTL in inbred lines
see onenote slides
In ideal world = QTL interval encompasses obvious candidate genes
QTL mapping very successful at identifying major genes but could have been identified using mendelian genetics
Statistical power
probability of detecting a statistical effect based on a given environmental design
The power to detect QTL depends on:
- sample size to gain precise estimate of variance components
- size of effect/penetrance of genetic effect; the bigger, the easier to detect
small sample size
leads to overestimation of small effect of QTL = Beavis effect
not enough observation of residual variance and overestimation of genetic covariance between individuals i.e. the genetic variance
Small QTL can be missed and if they are not, they will be overestimated
Precision problem
see onenote
How can resolution be increased?
- can increase marker but only until map is saturated
Increase overall number of recombination in progeny by:
- increase population size
- advance number of generations
Recombinant inbred lines
see onenote
- straightforward strategy to achieve higher resolution in QTL mapping
relies on additional generation(s) of selfing or backcrossing to increase:
- number of recombination
- derive fully isogenic inbred lines
multiple generations of backcrossing increase positional resolution
interval mapping becoming less relevant due to increase in sequencing throughput but crosses (inbred designs) remain very powerful
Isogenic
having the same or closely similar genotypes.