Key Q - Biological Flashcards
What is the Key question?
Can the use of animals in psychological research be justified?
Why is the issue relevant to today’s society?
- Society wants it scientists to be ethical which is done by reduction, refinement and replacement
- Ethical considerations of using animals are important to society
- Credibility of psychology is at stake
- There are high costs to animals
What did Kilkenny (2009) find about the use of animals in animal research which means the Credibility of Psychologists are at Stake?
271 US and UK studies found that only 59% of the studies mentioned the number of animals they had used
How are Rats Different to Humans?
- Different genetic structure
* Different balance in senses so perceive the world differently - e.g. sense of smell is better than humans
How are Rats and Humans Similar?
Brain structure + neurotransmitters are similar
How are Humans Different to Rats?
- Behaviour more complex
- Different motivations - e.g. may wish to please the researcher
- Superior cognitive abilities including self awareness
What are the 3 Main Arguments Against using Animals?
- Not generalisable to humans
- Alternatives to animal research are improving w/ technology
- It’s argued that the environment + stress animals endure in the labs can affect their behaviour
How is Alternatives to Animal Research are Improving with Technology a reason Against using Animals?
- Computer models + virtual reality can be used instead
- It’s a better way of isolating + controlling variables
- So, use of animals in some research is redundant in the future
How is the Environment + Stress Animals endure in the labs a reason Against using Animals?
- It affects their behaviour
- So, results obtained arent a good rejection of the animals natural behaviours
- So, results from lab experiments with animals are meaningless
What is Human Behaviour Influenced by?
- Complex emotions
- Cognitions
- Social interactions
What did Ferrari (2003) study which Supports the Argument Against using Animals?
Link between neurotransmitters + aggression in rats
What was Ferrari’s (2003) Procedure in his Study which Supports the Argument Against using Animals?
- Rays fought for 10 days - this was done by introducing an ‘intruder rat’ into test rats cage
- 11th day - no intruder rat was introduced
- Researcher mesures the levels of serotonin + dopamine in the test rats brain
What was Ferrari’s (2003) Conclusion in his Study which Supports the Argument Against using Animals?
- The test rats serotonin levels decreased
* As, they were anticipating a fight
What was the Problem with Generalising the Results to Humans of Ferrari’s (2003) Study which Supports the Argument Against using Animals?
- Humans have more complex social + cognitive functioning than rats
- If you replicated the study with male humans - they wouldn’t fight as they would think more clearly about the situation + work out the best cause of actions
Why is Generalisability used as an Argument Against using Animals?
Animals aren’t similar enough to humans to ensure that research results allow valid generalisations to humans
What are the 3 main Arguments for Using Animals?
- Animals used in psychological research have shorter lifespans than humans
- Use of animals allows better science
- Humans + animals have enough similarities in their physiology + evolutionary past in common to justify conclusions drawn from animals being generalised to humans