Intro- IRL Applications/ Mindset To Have While Studying/ Research Methods Flashcards
Empiricism
The “objective” approach.
Generalizing conceptsexperiences, and outcomes.
Keywords: systemic research
* when multiple research shows a different results, how do you organize the data
Scientific method
Describing what happens, predicting when, controlling what causes it to happen, and explaining why it happens
EX: what types of study behaviors lead students to get high scores? - give me an explanation (real world area of TOI but with CVs, not stats)
EX: what percentage of students earn passing grades?- describe this stat to me
Keywords: 5 steps empirical approach
Step 1- formulate a theory
When figuring out how to efficiently be more productive this year, I LOOKED BACK on the EVIDENCE of what didnt work and what did work (PRIOR RESEARCH) -
Look back at others research and my own ofc to make a theory (think theorizer)
Keyword: thesis structure
Theory
Explanation of how mental process or in turn, a behavior occurs
Step 2- develop testable hypoTHESIS
Theory (general) - - -> hypothesis tests an ASPECT of the theory (specific) because it targets of one the four goals of scientific method (D,P,C,E; explaining more efficiently, giving new approach to change current interpretations)
Hypothesis-> prove it right, that’s why its there
Step 3- test with research method
Descriptive, or relational, and experimental
Whichever one relates to your scientific method goal (DCPP)
Depends on how much control you need over manipulating and measuring certain factors (variables)- EX: use descriptive for deep dive observation if your variable needs to be measured/ observed.
Descriptive
Describe this statistic to me- give me THE STATS of a TOI (YOU get the stats lol)
Describes the many different things currently happening in the real world realm of TOI (EXPLAIN different popular study methods)
Through:
Case studies- in depth investigation of sample or organization
Observational studies- observe sample in a natural environment or lab
Self-reports- surveys, interviews, questionnaires
Correlational methods
This is BEFORE you manipulate -> OBSERVE different VARIABLES in a study in contrast to the other to identify a relationship between them
BUT cant explain WHY a phenomenon occurs (the cause- CHANGES in 1 variable CAUSES CHANGE in other)
Experimental methods
Investigate what CAUSES an OUTCOME
REMEMBER that its always an experiment if there is a manipulated IV and measurement of DV, regardless if the DV is self-reporting (their moods are the result- only they can tell you, you dont know if they’re lying)
EX: which study technique/the thing you change (NO “PORTIONS” OF STUDY) gave best scores possible?
Here you control the SITUATION (which study method they use)
Variables
characteristics that VARY from one categorical whole to another (CW is usually person, but here it is study method type)
variabilities in question-> CV = independent V remember? (Time)
EX: MANIPULATE how much time they get and MEASURE results
Step 4- analyze data
- Summarize raw data/FREQUENCIES - which scores were higher (method 1 or 2?)
BUT - Use proportions to objectively proves if one method is better IN GENERAL (math)
* dont change your hypothesis after analyzing data, because the new claim is NOT the one you did all the research for. When you’re wrong, you’re wrong
Step 5; report data
Report all data and interpretations (not just things that prove YOUR ypothesis- CHERRY-PICKING).
Peer-reviewed scientific journal has it all
Replication (step 4 share results)
“Confirm email address’” - expect same GENERAL results
Conduct additional research to diverse samples -> boosts confidence in findings and generalizability
Means that research is ongoing and can always be added to
To help with future replication- Report specific details of methods and analyses, and share materials used and data
Institutional review boards (IRBs)
Smart ppl saying;
- observe people without theri knowledge in public but not in PRIVATE
- their info is CONFIDENTIAL
- informed consent (in writing), researchers need to mislead them on what the study is (because pppl change their behavior when they know) but NEED to tell them after
- no big pain but little pain good, if big pain “needed” (virus) , use risk/benefit ratio
Independent variable
(In experimental method)
Manipulate it
EX: WHICH study method they use, but also randomly ASSIGN ppl to DIFF LEVELS of the IV
I seek to understand this variable the most