How did German history influence Nazi foreign policy? Flashcards
What was the Aryan Racial Theory
- The Nazi ‘Aryan’ race was an invention which drew on ideas circulating in the 19th century of:
- the superiority of Nordic and Germanic races
- Social Darwinism
What was social darwinism
The theory that humankind, like all species, faced a struggle for existence - “survival of the fittest”
What did Nazis believe the survival of a race depended on
- Its ability to reproduce:
- the process of gathering land to support and feed that expanding population, and focus on maintaining the purity of its gene pool
- This struggle, naturally, resulted in violent conquest and military confrontation
What was the Nazi belief of Eugenics that were current in WG
The Nazis thought that the ‘Aryan’ races was superior to all other races, specifically ethnic groups
How did the nazis justify their foreign policy through Eugenics
- They wanted Germany to be a great Aryan empire and used the idea of Pan-Germanism to excuse this
- Uniting all German-speaking peoples in one country would mean capturing other countries and clearing them of ‘inferior’ people to give pure Germans’ enough land to live on thus fulfilling their aim of Lebensraum
Define ‘Pan-Germanism’
- the idea that all German-speaking peoples should be united and live in one country
What are 3 key ways that Nazi Aryan Racial Theories influenced Nazi Foreign Policy
- Lebensraum for ‘pure Germans’
- aim to expand eastwards (at times, using military force), taking land from those who were racially inferior
- Germanisation policies implemented in the new territories e.g. the persecution of inferior races and ‘undesirables’
Ideas on Aryan racial theory, therefore, affected Nazi foreign policy because they led the Nazis to favour alliances….
with racially acceptable countries, such as Britain
However, their racial theory did not stop the Nazis from making alliances with …….. countries to gain …….
- inferior
- temporary advantage
Where was Hitler’s sense of entitlement for a strong Third Reich possibly from
- Earlier German empires and the sense that power and land were Germany’s right
- Hitler’s Third Reich was meant to be a Germany returned to its rightful power and place in Europe
In what way was Hitler’s Third Reich aspirations in relevance to previous Germanies different to WG
- Unlike the Weimar politicians, who simply wanted to overturn the ToV and return to 1914,
- the Nazis wanted to overturn ToV and then expand further, securing far more land in the east than Germany had held in 1914.
Which two earlier German empire’s successes did Nazi German Policy orientate towards
- The First Reich - 800-1806
- The Second Reich - 1871-1914
What features of 2 previous German empires successes influenced Nazi foreign policy
- Both empires had gained land, and kept it, by war and military strength
- they also worked hard diplomatically for acceptance by other nations, especially when first in power
- e.g The Second Reich had a series of carefully created alliances with other nations.
How could previous German empires influence on German foreign policy be utilised in propaganda
- As well as endorsing a policy of expansionism, during his early years in power, his foreign policy emphasised his desire for peace
- Referring back to earlier empires in propaganda was also a way of giving the Nazis credibility and justifying the expansion of the German nation
- They could highlight that they were ‘continuing’ and ‘restoring’ a great Germany
How did the response of the Allies to the ToV also encourage the Nazis to expand further and develop militarily
- Countries, like Britain, perceived the terms of the Treaty as too harsh
- & consequently turned a blind eye to Germany’s infringement of the terms, like German rearmament
- Britain even signed a Naval Agreement with Nazi Germany in 1935
Why perhaps did the Allies acceptance of the Nazis view of the ToV perhaps make them think that wouldn’t encourage the Nazis to expand further and develop militarily
- They seemed to accept this reversal of “unfair” terms, hoping that Germany, if appeased would not pursue expansionist policies and they would not to have to fight another war
Why were the allies wrong about appeasing rearamament policies
- Instead, Hitler and the Nazis were given the confidence to pursue expansionist goals in their foreign policy
Why was opposition to the ToV vital to support for Nazi foreign policy
- Opposition to the ToV made any political party popular and the Nazis, like most Germans, rejected the Treaty as a matter of course
- The Nazi foreign policy, therefore, aimed to overturn the terms the Treaty