Homework (Studies) Flashcards
Beck, Rush, Shaw and Emery, 1979
- Homework is essential part of CBT
Kanzantzis and Lampropoulos, 2002
- Utilized to practice and integrate in lives
Kanzantzis et al, 2010 (p1)
o 14 control studies compared outcome for clients with/without homework.
o 70% of clients with homework had better outcomes
Kanzantzis et al (2016)
o Quantity (15) and Quality (13) of homework had large effect on outcome, relatively stable at 1-12month follow up
o enhances CBT effectiveness
o quality of homework may matter as much as completion.
Kanzantzis et al (2017) (p1)
Not a 1:1 ratio of quantity: quality, needs to be more quality of homework assessed. Quantity does not convey learning.
Conklin and Strunk (2015)
-depression.
o Positive relationship between homework compliance and treatment outcome
o Higher engagement =positive symptom change
o Quality of homework = symptom improvements
Kanzantzis and Shinkfield, 2007
- Encouraged regular practice
o extent of engagement varies and often falls short of desirable levels
Kanzantzis et al 2010 (p2)
- Homework may vary considerably in terms of nature and therapeutic purpose, may depend on session number and which disorder it is aimed at
Beck and Broder (2016)
- Perhaps a use of another word e.g. action plan, conveys the proactivity and taking control instead of homework which doesn’t convey the collaborative nature of the task. Action plan conveys the none-optional, collaborative and emphasises that most work is done between sessions that has impact. Once finished creating action plan ask, ‘how likely are you to do this assignment this week?’ -talk through potential barriers.
Tompkins, 2002; Kanzantzis et al 2000
Numerous guidelines for implementing homework engagement Among techniques -3 categories
- review of homework
- assignment
- identify and help overcome potential barriers
Garland and scott, 2002; Kanzantzis et al 2003
- review of homework
Tompkins et al 2002
- Some experts have recommended working with patients to identify and overcome the potential barriers that may prevent engagement
Sachsenweger et al (2015),
may adhere out of desire of approval or acceptance/fear of failure
Helbig and Fehm (2004)
patient variables most decisive of homework compliance
Startup and Edmonds (1994)
therapist behaviours in promoting homework (rationale, clear description, anticipating problems and involving the patient in the process) -patient ratings
homework compliance -therapist ratings
failed to find evidence that any therapist behaviour was associated with homework compliance
o E-ceiling effect in patients rating may have limited their ability to detect in effects of interest.