Historical Criticisms

Question 1

_ examines the origins of earliest text to appreciate the underlying circumstances upon which the text came to be.

Answer 1

Historical criticism

Question 2

Historical criticism has two important goals: _ and _.

Answer 2

1. To discover the original meaning of the test in its primitive or historical context and its literal sense or sesus literalis hisoricus
2. To establish a reconstruction of the historical situation of the author and recipients of the text

Question 3

Historical criticism has two types: _ and _.

Answer 3

External criticism and internal criticism

Question 4

Historical criticism has its roots in the 17th century during the Protestant Reformation and gained popular recognition in the 19th and 20th centuries.

Answer 4

Okay.

Question 5

In historical criticism,
_ analyzes and studies the sources used by biblical authors.

Answer 5

Source Criticism

Question 6

In historical criticism,
_ seeks to determine a unit’s original form and historical context of the literary tradition.

Answer 6

Form criticism

Question 7

In historical criticism,
_ regards the author of the text as editor of the source materials.

Answer 7

Redaction Criticism

Question 8

In historical criticism,
_ attempts to tract the developmental stages of the oral tradition from its historical emergence to its literary presentation.

Answer 8

Tradition criticism

Question 9

In historical criticism,
_ focuses its interpretation of the bible on the text of biblical canon.

Answer 9

Canonical Criticism

Question 10

There are two parts to a historical criticism: to _ and to _.

Answer 10

1. determine the authenticity of the material (provencance of the source).
2. weigh the testimony to the truth

Question 11

_ is where the critic must examine the trustworthiness of the testimonies as well as the probability of the statements to be true.

Answer 11

Internal Criticism

Question 12

_ determines the authenticity of the source.

Answer 12

External Criticism

Question 13

In external criticism, the authenticity may be tested in two ways:
_ criticism which is the deciphering and dating of historical manuscripts.
_ criticism which is the critical analysis of historical document to understand how the document came to be the information transmitted and the relationships between the facts purported in the document and the reality.

Answer 13

Paleographical;
Diplomatic

Question 14

_ determines the historicity of the facts contained in the document. Thus, it is not necessary to prove the authenticity of the material or document.

Answer 14

Internal Criticism

Question 15

One of the unfulfilled needs of the historian is more of what the French call “_” or the dictionaries of biography giving examples of handwriting.

Answer 15

isographies

Question 16

_ have been the subject of special study by sigillographers, and experts can detect fake ones.

Answer 16

Seals

Question 17

_ (idiom, orthography, or punctuation) can be detected by specialists who are familiar with contemporary writing.

Answer 17

Anachronistic styles

Question 18

_ (too early or too late or too remote) or the dating of a document at a time when the alleged writer could not possibly have been at the place designated (the alibi) uncovers fraud.

Answer 18

Anachronistic references to events

Question 19

_ states that the historian is many times removed from the events under investigation and historians rely on surviving records.

Answer 19

History as Reconstruciton

Question 20

_ states that historians have to verify sources, to date them, locate their place of origin and identify their intended functions.

Answer 20

Historical Method

Question 21

_ is the process of critically examining and analyzing the records and survivals of the past.

Answer 21

Historical Method

Question 22

_ is an object from the past or testimony concerning he past on which historians depend in order to create their own depiction of that past.

Answer 22

Historical Sources

Question 23

_ are tangible remains of the past.

Answer 23

Historical Sources

Question 24

Examples of written sources are: _ and _.

Answer 24

Published Materials, Manuscripts

Question 25

Examples of non-written sources are: _, _, _, _, _, _, and _.

Answer 25

Oral history, artifact, ruin, fossils, art works, video recordings, audio recordings

Question 26

_ are testimony of an eyewitness. They must have been produced by a contemporary of the event it narrates.

Answer 26

Primary Sources

Question 27

_ is a document or physical object which was written or created during the time under study.

Answer 27

Primary Sources

Question 28

_ were present during an experience or time period and offer a inside view of a particular event.

Answer 28

Primary Sources

Question 29

_are characterized by their content, regardless of whether they are available in original format, in microfilm/microfiche, in digital format, or in published format.

Answer 29

Primary Sources

Question 30

The four categories of primary sources are: _, _, _, and _.

Answer 30

1. Written sources
2. Images
3. Artifacts
4. Oral Testimony

Question 31

_ interpret and analyze primary sources. These sources are one or more steps removed from the event.

Answer 31

Secondary Sources

Question 32

_ may have pictures, quotes or graphics of primary sources in them.

Answer 32

Secondary Sources

Question 33

Examples of secondary sources are:

Answer 33

History textbook, printed materials

Question 34

_ is concerned to authenticity. It is made to spot fabricated, forged, and faked documents and to distinguish a hoax or misinterpretation.

Answer 34

External Criticism

Question 35

There are two determinants of authenticity: _ and _.

Answer 35

Date and Author

Question 36

In the test of authenticity:
_ refers to idiom, ortography, punctuation
_ refers to events being too early, too late or too remote
_ determines the events’ genuineness

Answer 36

Anachronistic Style;
Anachronistic reference to events;
Provenance or custody

Question 37

_ is a systematic evaluation of the primary source, be it a test, painting, caricature, and/or speech that in the process students could develop and present an argument based on their own understanding of the evidences from their readings.

Answer 37

Content Analysis

Question 38

_ considers specifically the time, place and situation when the primary source was written. The analysis as well includes he author’s background, authority on the subject, and intent perceptible and its relevance and meaning to people and society today.

Answer 38

Contextual Analysis