Forensic - Eyewitnesses Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

The goal of forensic investigators is to ________ a past event. This is done by _______ evidence and ________ evidence. Both forms of evidence are handled differently by the criminal justice system. There is not the same caution with ________ evidence as there is with _______ evidence.

A
reconstruct
physical
eyewitness
eyewitness
physical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Physical evidence has strict ______ for collecting and preserving. These have a strong _______ foundation. However, the evidence is often _________ (it ties someone to the scene, but not necessarily at the time of the crime).

Eyewitness evidence is not collected by ________ in human behaviour. And the process does not incorporate _______ research to a great extent. BUT it often _______ links the suspect to the crime.

A

protocols
scientific

specialists
psychological/scientific
directly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The general public sees memory as a video recorder, but psychologists know that memory is ________, __________ and susceptible to suggestion. Errors can occur at:
- _______ (eg: hard to see in a dark place)
- _______ (forgetting with delay, and incorporating previously known information)
- ________
Hence, it is not considered a _______ form of evidence. BUT the criminal justice system is based on ________.

A
fallible
reconstructive
encoding
storage
retrieval
reliable
precedence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the misinformation effect?

A

Exposure to incorrect information about an event after it has occurred, which often causes people to incorporate this misinformation into their memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Post-event Information encounters

Leading questions - give some examples and research of this

A

McMartin Preschool - 7 teachers accused of kidnapping kids - leading questions to the children. Not corroborated with other evidence - wouldn’t they see helicopters leaving the school?

Loftus & Palmer 1974 - changed the wording when asking about a traffic accident video. Asked participants about the speed. Responses varied according to “collided”, “hit”, “smashed”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Post-event Information encounters

Media report - give some examples and research of this of this

A

Washington sniper - media reported a white van, but it was actually a black sedan

Wright & Stroud 1998 - participants shown a shoplifting incident - then read a brief summary of the crime which had some misinformation - participants then incorporated these details into their memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Post-event Information encounters

Co-witnesses information - give some examples and research of this

“social contagion of memory” or “memory conformity”

A

Peter Hain - mistaken for a bank robber as witnesses spoke to each other afterwards and all said the perpetrator was wearing an army jacket. BUT he was actually wearing a Nike shirt.

Paterson & Kemp 2005

  • participants watch a video
  • don’t know there are two different versions
  • participants discuss what they remember to a co-witness (on some occasions they’ve seen the same videos, sometimes different ones)
  • one week later they individually recall what they have seen
  • participants consistently report misinformation that was previously stated by a co-witness during discussion
  • this occurs even if they are warned not to report what others tell them, or told them they were watching a different video
  • AND participants had no idea if they were in the “same” or “different” conditions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does co-witness information NOT have an effect on?

A

Perpetrator identification - potentially because they don’t discuss facial features in detail?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Paterson & Kemp, 2006 compared the impact of different methods of encountering misinformation. They found:

  • No effect of post-event information on memory accuracy for _______ items
  • _____ and ______ co-witness information conditions led to _____ accurate AND ____ accurate information. Hence, they have the same, strong effect.
A
control (no information given after event)
direct
indirect
more
less
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why does the misinformation effect occur?

Alternation Hypothesis
The original information does not exist because:
1. ______ slot: misinformation accepted because of a failure to ______ original information
2. _______: post-event information ______ the original memory
3. ______: encode misinformation in the same cognitive ______ as the original information which results in a _____ (eg: they say 4 people, you think 6, so you go with 5)

A
vacant
encode
overwriting
overwrites
blend
structure
blend
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why does the misinformation effect occur?

Co-existence Hypothesis
Both memories for the ______ event and the ______ are stored and each memory is capable of being _______. The original memory is not _______ but is less _______ than the misleading information. This could be due to (1) _______ effect or (2) _________interference

A
original
misinformation
recovered
replaced
accessible
recency
retroactive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What factors increase susceptibility to the misinformation effect?

A
  • age (young and old)
  • hypnosis
  • suggestibility
  • misinformation being repeated
  • misinformation is peripheral (not a central, important part of the event)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What factors decrease susceptibility to the misinformation effect?

A
  • Information blatantly contradicts what was witnesses (so you don’t take on central misinformation, and are less likely to take on peripheral)
  • source is not credible
  • witness is forewarned they might encounter misinformation BUT telling them after a week that they have encountered misinformation does not help
  • they make a public statement about it - so they stick with their story after this
  • less time between the event and presentation of misinformation (memory trace is stronger)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What can be done about the misinformation effect?

  • statements should be obtained _____ following an incident
  • ______ recall tools help elicit a comprehensive _______ from eyewitnesses and _______ the quality and quantity of accurate information.
    eg: Self-administered interview (paper and pencil booklet for witnesses).
  • completing this booklet minimises memory _______, maintains ______ and ______ memories from contamination.
  • But it is not useful for ______ events (eg: domestic violence, witnesses who don’t come fwd straight away, low literacy, etc), and it is very _______ and _______.
  • Hence, Helen has developed an app called “iWitnessed”
A
ASAP
immediate
statement
increase 
decay
accuracy
protects
ongoing
generic
inflexible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly