FMF 104 Administrative fundamentals Flashcards
THE development of an eval must be a what
team effort
Reporting Senior
COs and officers in charge (OICs) are reporting seniors by virtue of their command
authority. They may submit properly authorized FITREPs, CHIEFEVALs, and
EVALs on any member who has reported to them for duty, whether junior or senior
to them in grade. The term “commanding officer” is inclusive of all Services and
their civilian equivalents within the U.S. Federal Government. OICs are reporting
seniors if they are in charge of commissioned or established activities listed in the
Standard Navy Distribution List. When a member is assigned to a non-U.S.
Government activity, the reporting senior is the member’s U.S. administrative
commander unless another reporting senior is assigned by order or directive. A
member in this category may receive a letter-type report from the non-U.S.
Government activity for attachment to a FITREP, CHIEFEVAL, or EVAL.
Delegated Reporting Seniors
for specific direction refer to what?
Delegation of reporting senior authority is an actual transfer of that authority, and
not merely an authorization to sign “By direction.” For this reason, delegation is
held to the highest level consistent with effective observation of performance, and
the CO’s oversight responsibilities are carefully defined. For specific direction
concerning delegated reporting seniors, refer to BUPERINST 1610.10D, enclosure
(2), chapter 2.
Immediate Superiors in Command (ISICs)
An immediate superior in command (ISIC) is a reporting senior for assigned COs
and is authorized to assume the reporting senior authority of a subordinate CO
whose capacity to act as a reporting senior becomes impaired.
Enlisted Officer in Charge (OIC)
An enlisted OIC in the grade of E9 and civilians in command positions who hold the
grade of GS-9 through GS-12 may sign reports on E5 and below. A chief petty
officer (CPO) or senior chief petty officer (SCPO) may sign reports on personnel E4
and below only. GS-13 or equivalent may sign reports for E1 to E9. Reporting
senior authority for enlisted OICs in the grade of E7 and E8 may be delegated to
sign E5 reports with the prior written approval of NAVPERSCOM (PERS-32). All
other reports will be signed by a senior in the chain of command having authority to
report on the member concerned.
Enlisted Reporting Seniors
Chief Petty Officers (E7-E9) may act as reporting seniors for members in the
grades of E4 and below only. The next senior officer in the chain of command
having reporting authority for the members concerned must sign all other reports
Raters and Senior Raters
EVALs on personnel E6 and below should contain the signatures of a rater and
senior rater. The signature of the reporting senior is required. This ensures that
Navy’s senior enlisted and junior officer supervisors are properly included in the
enlisted EVAL process.
- The rater for personnel E1-E4 can be an E6 or civilian equivalent (GS-5). For
personnel E5-E6, the rater should be a Navy CPO whenever possible, but if none
is available within the command, the rater may be a military or civilian supervisor
who is an E7 equivalent (GS-6) or higher. Typically, the senior rater will be the
member’s division officer or department head. The senior rater may be omitted
where the reporting senior is the rater’s immediate supervisor. Table 2-1 in chapter
2 of BUPERINST 1610.10D provides guidance on evaluation raters, senior raters,
and reporting seniors for various sized commands
Performance Counseling
Counseling methods are up to the commanding officer. It is the CO’s program.
Performance counseling must be provided at the mid-point of the periodic report
cycle, and when the report is signed. The counselor will be a supervisor who
participates in the member’s EVAL or FITREP preparation. Commanding officers
will guide the counseling program and monitor counselor performance and results.
The objectives are to provide feedback to the member, and to motivate and assist
improvement. Performance counseling starts with a fair assessment of the
member’s performance and capabilities, to which the member contributes. It
identifies the member’s strengths and motivates their further improvement. It also
addresses important weaknesses, but should not dwell on unimportant ones. It
should avoid personality and concentrate on performance. The FITREP and EVAL
forms are used as counseling worksheets, and must be signed by the counselor
and member. Counselors may use the tick marks next to each performance
standard, and/or assign tentative trait grades, and may write comments. Under no
circumstances should a future promotion recommendation be promised during
counseling
what are the three eval types of reports
regular reports
concurrent reports
operational commander reports
regular reports
Regular reports are the foundation of the performance record and must be
submitted periodically per the schedule in table 1, and on other occasions specified in the EVALMAN. They must cover, day-for-day, all naval service on active duty or inactive drilling Reserve duty, except for enlisted initial entry training and other limited circumstances. Prior to submitting regular reports, efforts should be made to determine the ending date of the previous report, if any, to ensure regular report continuity is maintained.
concurrent reports
Concurrent reports provide a record of significant performance for active duty
(ACDU) and Full Time Support (FTS) members fulfilling additional duty (ADDU)
or temporary additional duty (TEMADD) orders; and for Reservists supporting
the ACDU and/or their designated cross-assigned billet assignment. They are
optional unless directed by higher authority, and may not be submitted by
anyone in the regular reporting senior’s direct chain of command. A Concurrent
report must be countersigned by the regular reporting senior, who may also
make it the Regular report for the period concerned if continuity is maintained
with the previous regular or regular/concurrent report. Refer to EVALMAN,
chapter 4 for detailed requirements.
operational commander reports
Operational Commander reports are optional, and may only be submitted on
COs or OICs as observed by their operational commanders who are not also
their regular reporting seniors. Refer to EVALMAN, chapter 5 for detailed
requirements.
what are administrative blocks
The administrative blocks, blocks 1, 3-19, blocks 22-26, block 44
(FITREP/CHIEFEVAL) or 48 (EVAL),
Guidance on Trait Grades
The meanings of the trait grades are printed on the form, along with
representative performance standards. The 5.0 trait grade is reserved for
performance that is far above standards and is notable for its exemplary or
leadership quality. The 1.0 trait grade means generally poor performance that
is not improving, or unsatisfactory performance with respect to a single
standard. For the majority of Sailors, most of the trait grades should be in the
2.0 to 4.0 range. Arbitrarily “two-blocking” the trait grades will be detrimental for
two reasons. First, the reporting senior’s summary group and cumulative trait
grade averages will be available to detailers and selection boards for comparison purposes. Second, it will be difficult for the reporting senior to
allocate promotion recommendations if everyone’s trait grades are the same.
Definitions are stated relative to both performance in that trait and promotability
with respect to that trait.
the performance grades and names
Superstar Performance – 5.0. Could be promoted two pay grades, and
still be a standout in this trait
Advanced Performance – 4.0. Far more than promotion ready in this trait
right now.
Dependable, “Fully-Qualified,” Journeyman Performance – 3.0. Can
handle this aspect of the next higher pay grade.
Useful, Promising Performance – 2.0. Needs development in this trait,
but is promotable if overall performance warrants it (i.e., sufficient
progress in this trait and no more than one other 2.0 trait). Exception: 2.0
trait grade cannot be assigned in Command or Organizational
Climate/Equal Opportunity on reports in pay grades E1-E6 and W2-O6
and maintain a promotion recommendation of “Promotable” or higher. For
pay grades E7-E9, a 2.0 trait grade cannot be assigned in Character and
maintain a promotion recommendation of “Promotable” or higher.
Disappointing Performance – 1.0. Until deficiencies are remedied in this
trait, should not be promoted, regardless of performance in other traits.
Comments Block (Block 41/43)
Comments should be based on verifiable facts. Numerical ranking among
peers is authorized. Explanation of the reporting senior’s forced distribution is
also useful. Use input from the member and the member’s immediate
supervisor(s), as well as the raters’ and reporting senior’s personal
observations.
Comments Block (Block 41/43) Do’s and Don’ts
Continuation sheets and enclosures are not allowed, except an endorsed
statement submitted by the member, a flag officer endorsement where
required, a civilian or foreign letter report, a letter extension of a
Concurrent/Regular report, or a classified letter-supplement. Specifically,
substantiate all 1.0 grades, three 2.0 grades, and any grade below 3.0 in
Character, or Command or Organizational Climate/Equal Opportunity in the
comments. Also, make general comments on the remainder of the
evaluative blocks. If there is a promotion recommendation of “Significant
Problems,” or any recommendation against retention, treat the report as
adverse. Any comment suggesting persistent weaknesses, continuing
incapacity, or unsuitability for a specific assignment or promotion must also
be treated as adverse matter, regardless of grades assigned. Do not
include classified matter in the report, and do not submit classified
supplements unless absolutely necessary. Include required comments and
address special interest items as appropriate. Do not include any of the
prohibited comments. (The list of required and prohibited comments and
special interest items are available in chapter 13 of the EVALMAN.)
Comments Block (Block 41/43) Style and Content
Space is limited. Avoid preambles and get directly to performance. Do not
use puffed-up adjectives. Use direct, factual writing that allows the
performance to speak for itself. Bullet style is preferred. Give examples of
performance and results. Quantify wherever possible, but do not stress
quantity at the expense of quality. Avoid stock comments that make
everyone sound alike. Be consistent with the trait marks. comments on poor performance or misconduct where necessary, but be judicious. Define
seldom used acronyms. Use the sections of the report that have been setaside for them. Remember the report will be made a part of the member’s
OMPF and that the report is a permanent part of the official record.
Comments Block (Block 41/43) Promotion Recommendation Summary Groups
Promotion recommendations should be consistent with the performance trait
grades, and with the Individual or Member Trait Average displayed on the form.
Do not make “Early Promote” and “Must Promote” recommendations merely
because quotas are available, and do not recommend any member as
“Promotable” who could not, if called on, currently perform the basic duties of
the next higher grade. Do not automatically place individuals in the “Early
Promote” category when they are evaluated singly. Use the same standards for
trait grades and recommendations as are used for other members of the
command. For enlisted personnel, a recommendation of “Promotable” or above
is the CO’s official recommendation for advancement, even if made by a
delegated reporting senior. A mark of Progressing cannot be assigned on an
EVAL or CHIEFEVAL when a Promotable or higher promotion
recommendation for advancement has been given in a previous report in the
same pay grade. A member’s promotion recommendation can go from
“Significant Problems” on one report to “Early Promote” on the next report
based on the member’s performance and the reporting senior’s
recommendation.
Comments Block (Block 41/43) Misconduct Reporting
Adverse or downgraded FITREPs, CHIEFEVALs, and EVALs may not be
directed as punishment or used as an alternative to the proper disposition of
misconduct under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Reports may
not mention non-punitive censure, or investigatory, judicial, or other
proceedings which have not been concluded or which have exonerated the
member. Subject to these limitations, FITREPs, CHIEFEVALs, and EVALs
should take into account misconduct that has been established through reliable
evidence to the reporting senior’s satisfaction.
Responsibilities and Rights of Members on eval reports
Members shall sign all of their Regular reports, unless impossible to do so, and
shall sign other reports where possible.
Members shall receive a copy of every report from the reporting senior at the
time it is signed.
Members have the right to submit a statement to the record concerning their
reports, either at the time of the report or within 2 years thereafter. Such a
statement shall be endorsed by the original reporting senior and forwarded to
NAVPERSCOM (PERS-32). If the reporting senior feels that the member’s
statement does not meet the requirements as prescribed in BUPERSINST
1610.10D, chapter 17, then the reporting senior should counsel the member. If
members refuse to change their statements, then the reporting senior should
submit the members’ statement along with the endorsement to NAVPERSCOM
(PERS-32) for review.
Members have the right to communicate directly with selection boards, and
have various avenues by which to appeal for change or removal of their
reports.
Members have the right to review their records, and have the responsibility to
ensure that their records are complete.
what are the navper FORMS on evals
NAVPERS 1610/2 W2-O6
NAVPERS 1610/5 O7-O8 (not pictured)
NAVPERS 1616/27 E7-E9
NAVPERS 1616/26 E1-E6
the following types of naval correspondence is portrayed as?
To a large degree, the image and effectiveness of the DON is portrayed by the
tone, quality, and responsiveness of correspondence.
Be neat in appearance, correctly formatted, error free, and grammatically
correct. With the use of computers and advanced word processing software,
the long-accepted practice of allowing legible “pen and ink” changes to a piece
of correspondence is no longer acceptable. All correspondence shall be free of
typographical errors and technically correct before it is signed.
Avoid stereotyping men and women based on gender. Use pronouns and titles
that are gender neutral.
Do not write unless you must. A conversation in person, by telephone, or by
electronic mail (e-mail) often saves two letters - the one you would have written
and the other person’s response. Conversations are often better than
correspondence for working out details. Confirm your conversation with a short
memorandum (also referred to as “memo”) to the other person or a
“Memorandum For The Record” if issues of importance or policy are agreed
upon during the conversation.
Always include a point of contact, return telephone number, and e-mail address
when your correspondence might prompt a reply or inquiry
Identifying Navy Personnel 104
Abbreviated rank for officers and rate and warfare designator for enlisted
personnel (e.g., AD1(AW), BM2(SW), CSSN(SS)) with no space between
rank/rate and warfare designator,
first name, middle initial if any, and last name,
staff corps abbreviation (if any),
branch of service,
the 10-digit Electronic Data Interchange Personal Identifier (EDIPI), referred to
as the DoD ID number (should be used as a substitute for the SSN whenever
possible). The last four digits of the SSN (when use of the SSN is justified),
the designator for an officer.
Example:
LCDR Kenneth O. Allison, USN, XXX-XX-1234/3100
YN1 (SW) Robert L. Gabel, USN, 1234567890
YN2 Jazsmne Wilson, USN, XXX-XX-1234
Identifying Marine Corps Personnel 104
Unabbreviated grade.
First name, middle initial if any, and last name.
10-digit Electronic Data Interchange Personal Identifier (EDIPI), referred to as
the DoD ID number (should be used as a substitute for the SSN whenever
possible). The last four digits of the SSN (when use of the SSN is justified),
Military Occupational Specialty (MOS).
Branch of service.
Examples:
Colonel Rodney C. Jones 0123456789/0430 USMC
Major Timothy C. Beck 2013538698/0202 USMC
Sergeant J. Keller 3096589299/0411 USMC
Use of Letterhead Stationary
Use command letterhead stationery only for official matters of the command.
Printing names of officials on letterhead stationery is prohibited. When using
letterhead stationery, the “From:” line will always contain the title of the activity
head and command name. The “From:” line will never contain the name of an
individual.
Use command letterhead stationery when corresponding as a member of a
DON approved board or committee. Indicate the letter is from the signing
official by using the board or committee title in the “From:” line.
Do not use letterhead as personal stationery. For example, CDR Baker,
captain of the ship’s basketball team, may not use it for matters involving the
team.
The use of letterhead is authorized for commanders, commanding officers,
officers in charge and directors or those who have signature authority for
commands that are represented in the SNDL only.
Use of Enclosures
An enclosure can prevent a letter from becoming too detailed. Try to keep letters
short, down to one page whenever possible, and use enclosures for lengthy
explanations that cannot be avoided. An enclosure may include such things as
manuals, publications, photocopies of correspondence, charts, etc. belonging to
the specific DON organization only. No external documents area allowed to be
enclosures. Consider making them references instead.
Enclosures must be marked on the first page; however, you may mark all
pages. An enclosure marking goes in the lower right corner, whether the text is
arranged in portrait or landscape orientation. Type “Enclosure” and its number
in parentheses. Arrange the typed pages lengthwise so they can be read from
the right.
Number only second and later pages. If you have several different enclosures,
number the pages of each independently.
When size, weight, or other factors prevent sending an enclosure with a letter,
send it separately and type “(sep cover)” after the enclosure’s description.