Eyewitness Testimony Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Is memory an exact copy of what happened?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Retrieval involves _______

A

Active reconstruction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define: active reconstruction

A

In retrieval, we retrieve some exact details, as well as details that are plausible (based on our beliefs, values or expectations).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define: leading question

A

a question that is phrased in such a way as to suggest or lead to the desired answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

leading questions contain presuppositions. Define: presupposition

A

information that should/must be true in order for the question to make sense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happened in the first Loftus and Palmer Study?

A

45 volunteer uni students were allocated to 5 conditions; watched 7 clips of car accidents and were asked many questions (like an eyewitness testimony). They were asked the critical question: “About how fast were the cars going then they [smashed into/collided with/bumped into/hit/contacted] each other?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Resutls about the first Loftus and Palmer study?

A

The more intense the verb, the faster the estimation the speed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conclusion/explanation for results of Loftus and Palmer’s first study?

A

REconstructed memory made, from some exact details of the crash with their expectations of the presupposition in the leading question. THis lead them to give faster/slower estimated speeds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened in Loftus and Palmer’s second study?

A

150 uni students watched car crash clip and randomly allocated to 3 groups: being asked “About how fast were the cars going when they smashed into/hit each other” or being asked nothing.
A week later, they were asked multiple questions including “Did you see any broken glass?” and there was none.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Results of the second experiment?

A

16 in “smashed into” condition saw glass; 7 in hit, 6 in control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explanation of the results in the second experiment?

A

when asked how fast the car was going, the participants’ expectation of its speed was integrated into the reconstructed memory of the crash (along with some exact details of the crash). This reconstructed memory was retrieved again when they were asked if they saw broken glass; and the reconstructed memory influenced how they answered this question.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define: source confusion

A

the true source of the memory is forgotten or when a memory is attributed to the wrong source.
o Eg. presuppositions were confused with the details of the original memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does reconstruction work?

A
  1. upon retrieval, misinformation provided by the presupposition of the leading question is integrated with the real details of the memeory. this might BIAS our retrieval of a memory, to match the leading question
  2. reconstructed memory is stored in LTM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

REconsolidation?

A

Reconsolidation happens each time the memory is retrieved; reconsolidated memory may be reconstructed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly