Experimental Methods and Measures Flashcards

1
Q

Content Validity

A

Four types of test validities are used to examine how well a research design tests what it was supposed to test. Content validity refers to the extent to which a design assesses the full scope of content that researchers intend to measure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Construct Validity

A

Construct validity tells us how well a test measures what it is supposed to test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Criterion Validity

A

Criterion validity refers to the extent to which a test correlates with an established “criterion” or existing measure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Predictive Validity

A

Predictive validity refers to the extent to which a test predicts a later score on some other test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

An experiment is carried out to measure the relative effects that pregnancy has on the intelligence of pregnant mothers. Measurements of IQ are taken before, during, and after pregnancy. Later, critics of the study argue that testing IQ only captures some aspects of intelligence while missing others. These critics would argue that the study lacks which kind of validity?

A

Content Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

An evaluation is designed to predict whether individuals will develop diabetes. This evaluation is administered repeatedly over time with highly consistent results. However, it is later found that the test is extremely inaccurate in predicting diabetes onset and has several design flaws. This evaluation has:

A

Low validity but high reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

True or false: An experiment with high validity also had relatively high accuracy.

A

This statement is false. If a scientist measures every data point incorrectly this would produce “inaccurate” data. However, if by chance the error of each data point was distributed to produce a resultant mean that accurately represented the data set, the experiment would be considered “valid”. In other words, each individual measurement can have low accuracy, but this can still sometimes produce a “valid” data set.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Acquiescence bias

A

Acquiescence bias is the tendency to agree with a statement, especially one that the respondent does not fully understand or is uncertain about.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Quantitative methods always produce numbers

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Objective Measures

A

Unbiased and faced based

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Subjective Measures

A

Subject to opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

True or false: Quantitative research designs would be best for investigating a scientific topic in a field where few prior studies have been conducted.

A

This statement is false. In fields where not much knowledge has been collected, qualitative research, which is more exploratory, may provide more open-ended results. These open ended results can be used to come up with future research questions to be answered with quantitative designs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

True or false: Subjective research designs are non-numerical by their intrinsic nature.

A

This statement is false. Subjective research is research where data collection is colored by participants’ intrinsic biases. For instance, questions such as, “How are you feeling today?” However, experimenters can have participants answer these questions by using numerical scales (e.g., “How are you feeling today – on this scale from 1 to 10?”).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Extent to which a study’s results are both genuine and gernalizable

A

validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Internal Validity

A

The ability to draw causal conclusions, can we reliably say that a change in X explains the change in Y. Causal! The fewer confounding variables the better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Confounding Variable

A

Outside factor that impacts both X and Y

17
Q

External Validity

A

Generalizability

18
Q

Test Validity

A

Construct, Content, Criterion, and Predicative

19
Q

Likert Scale

A

continuum of responses strongly agree to strongly disagree

20
Q

Self Reporting Bias

A

Social desirability bias (it makes them look better). Acquiescence bias (likelihood to say yes)

21
Q

A questionnaire question using a Likert scale could best be described as

A

subjective and quantitative

22
Q

Which of the following is used by scientists to say whether or not an experimental test correlates well with other existing tests trying to measure a similar outcome?

A

Criterion validity

23
Q
A
24
Q

True or False: Operationalization is the process of carefully planning out of the details in a study’s design

A

This statement is false. Operationalization is the process of defining how a particular variable will be assessed or measured. An example of this would be defining “caffeine consumption” as “the number of milligrams of caffeine consumed per day”.