Critical Numbers 1 Flashcards

1
Q

How is a sample described?

A

Using descriptive statistics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How is inference about population made?

A

Inferential statistics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is sampling?

A

May be randomly or non-randomly selected
Different methods of random and non-random sampling
Sample must represent population of interest
Helps make results generalisable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is bias?

A

When certain subgroups from the target population are over/under-represented
Arise when imperfections in the research process cause our findings to deviate from the truth
Can occur in all studies
Can occur intentionally or unintentionally
Impacts upon validity and reliability of study findings
Can distort results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the types of bias?

A

Sampling bias - sample does not represent population of interest
Recall bias - inaccurate recall of past events/exposures/behaviours
Information bias - incorrect measurements e.g. miscalibrated machine
The ‘Hawthorne’ effect - participants change their behaviour when they know they are being observed
Attrition bias - differential dropout from studies e.g. sicker participants drop out so our outcome is only measured on healthier participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is confounding?

A

A form of bias
Confounding variables obscure the real effect of an exposure on an outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a confounder?

A

Related to both exposure and outcome
Not on the casual pathway

E.g. a high salt diet can cause high blood pressure which can lead to stroke
So blood pressure is not a confounding factor in the relationship between diet and stroke, rather a mechanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the types of study designs?

A

Experimental - the researchers have intervened in some way
Observational - the researchers have not intervened, merely observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What can observational studies be?

A

Retrospective - looking back into the past
Cross-sectional - a single snapshot in time
Prospective - following up over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are randomised controlled trials?

A

Randomly allocate participants to different interventions and follow up
- experimental
- prospective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the different types of randomised controlled trials?

A

Cluster randomised trials - participants randomised in groups (e.g. by GP centre or therapist) rather than at the individual level
Crossover trials - participants receive both interventions in a randomised order
Multi-arm and factorial trials - two or more interventions evaluated in a single study
Adaptive design trials - accruing information is used to inform planned design adaptations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are pros of randomised controlled trials?

A
  • Gold standard
  • Randomisation reduces potential for confounding
  • Can reduce bias via control and blinding
  • can determine causal effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are cons of randomised controlled trials?

A
  • Randomisation can be unfeasible or unethical
  • Require expert management and oversight, particularly for high risk interventions
  • Expensive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are cohort studies?

A

Non-randomised
Observational
Typically prospective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are pros of cohort studies?

A

Useful when random allocation not possible
Can work for rare exposures – select participants on the basis of exposure
Can examine multiple outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are cons of cohort studies?

A

May require long follow-up
Can be expensive
Not ideal for rare outcomes

17
Q

What are case-control studies?

A

Non-randomised
Observational
Retrospective

18
Q

What are pros of case-control studies?

A

Faster - use past data so do not require long follow-up
Useful for rare outcomes – select participants on the basis of outcome
Cheaper

19
Q

What are cons of case-control studies?

A

More prone to bias or poor quality data
Harder to show causal relationship
Not ideal for rare exposures

20
Q

What are cross-sectional studies?

A

Non-randomised
Observational
Single time point

21
Q

What are pros of cross-sectional studies?

A

Relatively quick
Cheap
Can assess multiple exposures/outcomes

22
Q

What are cons of cross-sectional studies?

A

Susceptible to bias
Cannot prove causality
Not ideal for rare exposures/outcomes

23
Q

What are ecological studies?

A

The unit of observation is group (aggregate) rather than individual
e.g. Electoral ward, country

24
Q

What are pros of ecological studies?

A

Large-scale comparisons
Can quantify geographical or temporal trends

25
Q

What are cons of ecological studies?

A

Ecological fallacy
Cannot make inference at the individual level