Criminal- Mahoney & Dixon Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

attractiveness and juries

A
  • Stewart= 60 trials, rate defendants= more ugly means more severe the punishment
  • Sigall & Ostrove= pretty or ugly photos, pass a sentence for burglary or fraud. higher sentence for burglary if ugly, higher sentence for fraud if pretty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

race and juries

A
  • Pfeiffer & Ogloff and O.J. SImpson case
  • black people are more guilty
  • even more so if the victim was white
  • if black person killed a white victim then they are more likely to receive the death penalty more than W killer killing B victim
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

O. J. SImpson trial

A
  • accused of killing his wife and her friend.
  • found not guilty for both counts
  • blacks thought of it as police misconduct and racism
  • whites saw him as guilty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

language and juries

A
  • doubtful language =
    1. less smart
    2. less believable
    3. less competent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

accent and juries

A
  • Seggie
  • pleads of innocence
  • assault = Aussie
  • theft = Brummie
  • brumme accent more negative than RP
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

applications

A

inadmissible evidence (evidence that cant be given to a jury for a variety of reasons)

  • lawyers know its wrong, but do anyway. it helps win cases
  • groups listened to an audio tape mock trial where critical evidence was introduced ‘accidentally’ by a witness, this was objected to and the judge ruled it inadmissible and should not listen to it. G1= given a legal explanation of why the evidence was inadmissible and G2 just told to disregard the information with no explanation. Participants were then told to decide on a verdict.
  • no legal explanation to why the evidence was inadmissible were able to ignore it and found the defendant guilty whereas those that were given a legal explanation where unable to ignore it and found the defendant not guilty.
  • Calling attention to inadmissible evidence makes it more important to the jury and they pay more attention.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

aim

A

is the brummie accent more guilty than RP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

sample

A

worcester uni students
119 undergrad
students from Birmingham excluded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

design

A

IV- brummie/ RP, race/ cheque fraud/ armed robbery

DV- guilt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

method

A
  1. 2 min recorded transcript
  2. police officer and young suspect
  3. guise spoke 2 accents
  4. race manipulated via contextual cues
  5. innocence rated on a scale.
    - superiority
    - attractiveness
    - dynamism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

results

A

brummie suspect= rated lower superiority and more guilt. black brummie cheque fraud more guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

conclusions

A

social factors influecning perception include

  1. crime type
  2. accent
  3. race
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

bouba- kiki effect

A
bouba = blob
kiki = spiky 

shows we infer things from the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly