Criminal Investigations 9th Ed - Ch 4 - Searches Flashcards
To conduct an effective search you must:
o Know the legal requirements for searching
o Know the items being searched for
o Know the elements of the crime being investigated and be organized, systematic, and thorough
The ______ Amendment to the US Constitution forbids unreasonable searches and seizures.
Fourth
All searches have ONE LIMITATION, that their scope must be ________. General exploratory searches are unconstitutional.
narrow
The exclusionary rule established that courts may not accept evidence obtained by unreasonable searches and seizures, regardless of its relevance to a case.
o Weeks v. United States (1914)
o Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
The _____ __ ___ __________ ____ doctrine established that evidence obtained as a result of an earlier illegality must be excluded from trial.
fruit of the poisonous tree
The ______ ________ _______ established that if illegally obtained evidence would in all likelihood eventually have been discovered legally, it may be used.
inevitable discovery doctrine
The ______-______ _______ doctrine established that illegally obtained evidence may be admissible if the police were truly not aware they were violating a suspect’s Fourth Amendment rights.
good-faith exception
All searches must be conducted under the authority of a warrant unless there are ______ ____________.
exigent circumstances
Searches without a warrant are considered per se unreasonable or “unreasonable.” It is the responsibility of the state to show that an exigent circumstance existed.
Johnson v. United States (1948)
A search can be justified and therefore considered legal if any of the following conditions are met:
o A search warrant has been issued
o Consent is given
o An officer stops a suspicious person and believes the person may be armed
o The search is incidental to a lawful arrest
o An emergency exists
______ ______ to search requires that a combination of facts makes it more likely than not that items sought are where the police believe them to be.
probable cause
When officers use information from civilians on _____ _______ _______, they should state whether the civilian is an informant or citizen giving information as a civic duty.
search warrant affidavits
When using informants, the court established a two-pronged test. This test is often called the Aguilar-Spinelli Test. This test looks at:
o Is the informant reliable / credible?
o Is the information believable?
The court abandoned the Aguilar-Spinelli approach in Illinois v. Gates (1983). In this case, they established a _________________ __________________________________. This is a principle upon which a number of legal assessments are made; it refers to the sum total of factors leading a reasonable person to a course of action.
totality of the circumstances test
_______ v. _______ (____) is the court case responsible for the “totality-of-the-circumstances test.”
Illinois v. Gates (1983)
The _________ requirement requires a search with a warrant be limited to the specific area and specific item named in the warrant.
particularity
Example: A search warrant issued for a specific garage (only) to locate a stolen vehicle would not allow officers to search the bathroom cabinet.
Consent to search must be ______, and the search must be limited to the area for which consent is given.
voluntary
When adult co-residents of a home are both present, and one denies consent to enter and search and the other purportedly grants consent, police MAY NOT ENTER or SEARCH based on the purported consent. In short, the denial of consent by one overrules and overrides what would have otherwise been a valid consent by the other.”
Georgia v. Randolph (2006)
_____v_____ (____) established police officer’s right to patdown or frisk a person they have stopped to question, if they believe the person might be armed and dangerous.
Terry v. Ohio (1968)