Crime - Topic 4 Other Research Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Pennington

A

Primacy recency effect supported

Persuasive effects if evidence is applied in story order. Jurors can make more sense of the information if it is presented in this order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Stewart

A

Correlational research, which investigated the relationship between the attractiveness and severity of punishment. A negative correlation between attractiveness and severity and no correlation found between race and severity of punishment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Castellow

A

Looked at the effects of having an attractive defendant as well as victim:

  • when defendant was attractive guilty verdicts were 56% of the time
  • when victim was attractive, guilty verdicts were 77% of the time
  • analysis of ratings shown physically attractive defendants and victims were positively rated on personality. Supports halo effect.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Penrod and cutler

A

In a mock trial it was shown that jurors place a lot of trust in witness confidence. If witness ays they are confident, jurors are more likely to believe them.

In a mock trial with several variables, jurors listened to expert witness testimonies along with other evidence and paid attention to details given by expert witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sigall and osgrove

A

Looked at the effect of the type of crime and the attractiveness of the defendant. When the crime was unrelated to attractiveness the participants assigned more lenient sentences. When crime was related to the attractiveness the participants gave more harsher sentences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Broeder

A

Demonstrated in a mock trial that evidence ruled inadmissible was hard for the jury to ignore. When a case was heard jurors gave more compensation when they heard about a drivers insurance, which was ruled inadmissible but not ignored by jury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Pickel

A

Calling attention to inadmissible evidence makes it harder to ignore as it makes it viewed to be more important. This explains the “backfire effect” where the judge gives legal explanation for evidence to be ignored but in reality it draws more attention to it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Eberhardt

A

Jury showed racial prejudice when it came to death penalty. As black defendants were more likely to get the death penalty, especially when the victim was white, but less so when victim was black.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Weisberg

A

Participants in a mock trial will consider fmri evidence more than other methods, and more likely to reach verdict of guilt. When limitations were explained however, verdicts of guilt decreased.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly