Crime and Deviance P2 Flashcards

1
Q

Official Statistics on Ethnicity and Crime:

A

Q: What do official statistics reveal about ethnicity and crime?

A: Black people are overrepresented in the criminal justice system. For example:

•	Black people make up about 3% of the population but 13% of the prison population.

•	Asians are also overrepresented in arrests compared to their population size.

Q: What are the limitations of official statistics?
A:
• Over-reliance on police data: Reflects police bias and stereotypes rather than actual crime rates.

•	Selective enforcement: Targeted policing in certain communities inflates crime figures for ethnic minorities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Victim Studies:

A

Q: What do victim studies show about ethnicity and crime?
A:
• Higher rates of victimisation reported among ethnic minorities.
• Most crimes are intra-ethnic (e.g., black-on-black crime).

Q: What are the limitations of victim studies?
A:
• Racial bias: Victims may overidentify offenders as being from a certain ethnic group.

•	Unreported crime: Many incidents go unreported, skewing data.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Self-Report Studies:

A

Q: What do self-report studies reveal about ethnicity and crime?
A:
• White respondents have higher rates of self-reported offending than black and Asian respondents.
• Challenges the stereotype that ethnic minorities commit more crime.

Q: What are the limitations of self-report studies?
A:
• Social desirability bias: Respondents may underreport crimes.
• Small sample sizes: May not accurately represent all ethnic groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Advantages and Disadvantages of Studies on Ethnicity and Crime:

A

Advantages:
• Offers a comprehensive understanding of racial disparities.
• Highlights the role of institutional racism.

Disadvantages:
• Overfocus on minorities, potentially ignoring white working-class crime.
• Racial bias in data collection undermines validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explaining Stop-and-Search Patterns:

A

Q: Why are ethnic minorities disproportionately stopped and searched?
A:
• Institutional racism: Macpherson Report (1999) found evidence of racism in the police after the Stephen Lawrence case.

•	Stereotyping: Reiner suggests the police operate with a “canteen culture” of racial bias.

Q: What are the impacts of stop-and-search on ethnic minorities?
A:
• Alienation and distrust of the police.
• Reinforcement of negative stereotypes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Prosecution, Trials, and Conviction Sentencing:

A

Q: How does ethnicity affect prosecution and sentencing?
A:
• Bowling and Phillips: Ethnic minorities are more likely to be charged but less likely to be convicted due to lack of evidence.

•	Convictions: Black offenders are more likely to receive custodial sentences for the same crimes compared to white offenders.

Q: What are the reasons for disparities?
A:
• Racial bias in judicial decisions.
• Socioeconomic factors influencing legal representation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Social Composition of Ethnicity and Crime:

A

Q: What role does social composition play in crime rates?
A:
• Ethnic minorities are overrepresented in deprived urban areas with high crime rates.
• Structural factors like unemployment, poverty, and lack of educational opportunities contribute to higher offending rates.

Q: Which sociologists support this view?
A:
• Left Realism (Lea and Young): Relative deprivation, marginalisation, and subcultures explain higher crime rates among ethnic minorities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Neo-Marxist Perspectives on Ethnicity and Crime:

A

Q: What do neo-Marxists argue about ethnicity and crime?
A:
• Hall et al. (Policing the Crisis): Moral panics around black mugging in the 1970s were used to distract from the economic crisis and justify tougher policing.
• Crime is a socially constructed label to control ethnic minorities.

Q: What are the criticisms of neo-Marxist perspectives?
A:
• Overemphasis on media manipulation.
• Ignores real issues like intra-ethnic violence and victimisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Crime Victimisation:

A

Q: What patterns exist in crime victimisation by ethnicity?
A:
• Ethnic minorities are at higher risk of hate crimes and street crime.
• Victimisation often occurs in deprived areas where minorities are concentrated.

Q: What explanations are there for these patterns?
A:
• Structural factors: Poverty and high-risk living environments.
• Cultural vulnerability: Hate crimes targeting minorities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Macpherson Report (1999):

A
  • Institutional racism in policing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hall et al. (1978):

A
  • Moral panics and policing minorities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bowling and Phillips (2002):

A
  • Ethnic disparities in arrests and sentencing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lea and Young (1984):

A
  • Left realism – structural causes of minority offending.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reiner (2000):

A
  • “Canteen culture” in police forces.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Media Representation of Crime:

A

Point: Media over-represents violent and sexual crimes.

Sociologist: Ericson et al. - Found that 45% of media reports focus on violent or sexual crime.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Explains public fear of crime and distorted perceptions.

*	Weaknesses: Doesn’t reflect actual crime statistics (e.g., most crimes are property-related).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Moral Panics:

A

Point: Media creates moral panics by labeling groups as “folk devils.”

Sociologist: Stanley Cohen - Mods and Rockers study (1972).

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Demonstrates how media exaggerates deviance and creates societal reactions.

*	Weaknesses: Outdated in the era of social media where moral panics are decentralised.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The Cycle of Moral Panic:

A
  1. Folk Devils
  2. Warning period
  3. Event
  4. Impact: labels attached to deviants
  5. Inventory: people form a picture
  6. Reaction: try to make sense
  7. Social control: can amplify the situation, making the fold devils a group with greater solidarity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Folk Devils definition:

A
  • Folk devil is a person or group of people who are portrayed in folklore or the media as outsiders and deviant, and who are blamed for crimes or other sorts of social problems.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Deviancy Amplification:

A

Point: Media exaggeration increases deviance through a “self-fulfilling prophecy.”

Sociologist: Leslie Wilkins - Concept of deviancy amplification spiral.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Supported by interactionist theories (e.g., Becker’s labelling theory).

*	Weaknesses: Ignores structural causes of crime, such as poverty or systemic inequality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Fear of Crime:

A

Point: Media increases fear of crime disproportionately to actual risks.

Sociologist: Gerbner et al. - Cultivation theory; media promotes “mean world syndrome.”

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights the psychological effects of prolonged media exposure.

*	Weaknesses: Fear may not translate into actual behavior changes (e.g., Ditton and Duffy suggest the link is overstated).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Media as a Cause of Crime:

A

Point: Media glamorises crime, leading to imitation or copycat behaviour.

Sociologist: Albert Bandura - Bobo Doll experiment on observational learning.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Explains how violent media can influence behaviour.

*	Weaknesses: Overly deterministic; Livingstone argues most people can differentiate between media and reality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Cybercrime:

A

Point: Media creates new forms of crime, such as hacking and online fraud.

Sociologist: Wall - Identifies four types of cybercrime (cyber-trespass, cyber-deception, cyber-pornography, and cyber-violence).

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights the evolving nature of crime due to technology.

*	Weaknesses: Traditional crimes still dominate official statistics (e.g., burglary, theft).
23
Q

Marxist View on Media and Crime:

A

Point: Media focuses on working-class crime, ignoring corporate and white-collar crimes.

Sociologist: David Gordon - Selective law enforcement ensures working-class crime is over-represented.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights ideological control by the ruling class.

*	Weaknesses: Assumes media is fully controlled by elites; neglects the rise of independent journalism.
24
Q

Postmodern View on Media and Crime:

A

Point: Media creates a “hyperreality” where crime is consumed as entertainment.

Sociologist: Jean Baudrillard - Media blurs reality and representation, making crime a spectacle.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Explains phenomena like true crime documentaries and reality TV.

*	Weaknesses: Too abstract—lacks empirical support for its claims.
25
Q

Left Realist Critique:

A

Point: Media promotes relative deprivation through consumerism.

Sociologist: Jock Young - Media advertising creates a “bulimic society,” intensifying crime among marginalised groups.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Links media portrayal to real economic and social inequality.

*	Weaknesses: Overemphasises media’s role and ignores other structural factors.
26
Q

Social Media and Crime:

A

Point: Social media facilitates both crime reporting and commission.

Sociologist: Jewkes - Argues social media democratises information but also spreads deviance.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights the dual role of social media in crime awareness and misinformation.

*	Weaknesses: Difficult to measure the true impact on crime rates.
27
Q

Global Criminal Economy:

A

Sociologist: Manuel Castells

Point: Globalisation has created a global criminal economy worth billions, including drugs, human trafficking, and arms smuggling.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights the scale and profitability of transnational crime networks.

*	Weaknesses: Overemphasises economic factors; ignores cultural aspects like local criminal traditions.
28
Q

Glocal Crime:

A

Sociologists: Hobbs and Dunningham

Point: Criminal networks operate “glocally” — locally based but globally connected.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Explains the mix of global supply chains (e.g., drugs) with local distribution.

*	Weaknesses: Lacks clarity on the role of individual agency in criminal activity.
29
Q

McMafia:

A

Sociologist: Misha Glenny

Point: Post-Soviet globalisation allowed criminal organisations to act like multinational corporations.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Explains the rise of sophisticated, profit-driven crime networks.

*	Weaknesses: Focuses heavily on economic motivations, ignoring political or social drivers.
30
Q

Risk Society:

A

Sociologist: Ulrich Beck

Point: Globalisation creates a “risk society” where threats like terrorism and cybercrime dominate perceptions.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights the psychological impact of globalisation on fear of crime.

*	Weaknesses: Overlooks how some risks are amplified disproportionately by the media.
31
Q

Human Trafficking:

A

Sociologist: Castells

Point: Globalisation exacerbates inequalities, increasing the prevalence of human trafficking for labour and sexual exploitation.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Explains the role of global inequality in fostering modern slavery.

*	Weaknesses: Solutions are often focused on law enforcement rather than addressing root causes like poverty.
32
Q

Cultural Globalisation and Crime:

A

Sociologist: Taylor

Point: Globalisation promotes consumer culture, leading to feelings of relative deprivation and increased crime.

Evaluation:
• Strengths: Links cultural influences to criminal motivations.
• Weaknesses: Overemphasises global culture; neglects individual agency.

33
Q

Global Governance of Crime:

A

Sociologist: Franko Aas

Point: Globalisation has led to international efforts to control crime, such as INTERPOL and UN
agreements.

Evaluation:
• Strengths: Highlights the role of global institutions in tackling transnational crime.
• Weaknesses: Effectiveness is limited by state sovereignty and lack of enforcement power.

34
Q

Definition of Green Crime:

A

Sociologist: Nigel South

Point: Defines green crime as acts that harm the environment, including pollution, deforestation, and illegal wildlife trade.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Broad definition highlights various types of environmental harm.

*	Weaknesses: Difficult to enforce due to varying legal definitions across countries.
35
Q

Primary and Secondary Green Crimes:

A

Sociologist: Nigel South

Point:
* Primary Green Crimes: Direct harm to the environment (e.g., deforestation, air pollution).
* Secondary Green Crimes: Crimes that arise from environmental laws being flouted (e.g., toxic waste dumping).

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Distinction clarifies the scope of green crime.

*	Weaknesses: Overlaps between categories can complicate enforcement.
36
Q

Anthropocentric vs. Ecocentric Views:

A

Sociologist: White

Point:
* Anthropocentric View: Humans prioritise economic growth over environmental protection.
* Ecocentric View: Humans and the environment are interdependent; environmental harm harms humanity.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights ideological conflicts in addressing green crime.

*	Weaknesses: Too idealistic; ecocentric views are less influential in policy making.
37
Q

Crimes of Air Pollution:

A

Sociologist: Potter

Point: Air pollution caused by industries contributes to global health issues and climate change.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Demonstrates the tangible impact of corporate actions on public health.

*	Weaknesses: Industrial development is prioritised in many countries, limiting action against pollution.
38
Q

International Responses to Green Crime:

A

Sociologist: Franko Aas

Point: Global efforts to combat green crime include international agreements, such as the Paris Climate Accord.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights the role of international collaboration.

*	Weaknesses: Limited enforcement power and reliance on voluntary compliance.
39
Q

Victims of Green Crime:

A

Sociologist: Wolf

Point: Victims of green crime are often poor, marginalised communities in developing countries.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights inequalities in who suffers the most from environmental harm.

*	Weaknesses: Ignores environmental harm in wealthier nations.
40
Q

State-Corporate Green Crime:

A

Sociologist: Kramer and Michalowski

Point: State and corporate interests often collude in environmental destruction, such as oil spills or deforestation.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights how powerful actors are complicit in green crime.

*	Weaknesses: Difficult to hold states accountable due to sovereignty and political influence.
41
Q

Environmental Justice:

A

Sociologist: Beck

Point: Green crimes are part of living in a “risk society” where technological and industrial development create global environmental risks.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Explains the link between modernisation and environmental harm.

*	Weaknesses: Does not offer clear solutions for addressing green crimes.
42
Q

Globalisation and Green Crime:

A

Sociologist: Wolf

Point: Globalisation exacerbates green crime by enabling corporations to exploit weak environmental regulations in developing countries.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Explains how global inequalities contribute to environmental harm.

*	Weaknesses: Focuses on corporate crime but overlooks individual responsibility
43
Q

Green Criminology:

A

Sociologist: Rob White

Point: Adopts a transgressive approach to criminology, focusing on environmental harm rather than legal definitions of crime.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Goes beyond narrow legal definitions to address broader environmental issues.

*	Weaknesses: Subjective—what is considered “harm” varies across cultures and contexts.
44
Q

Definition of State Crime:

A

Sociologist: Green and Ward

Point: Define state crime as “illegal or deviant activities perpetrated by, or with the complicity of, state agencies.”

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights crimes by powerful institutions often ignored by mainstream criminology.

*	Weaknesses: Difficult to measure as states may conceal or deny involvement.
45
Q

Types of State Crime:

A

Sociologist: McLaughlin

Point: Identifies four types of state crime:
1. Political Crimes: Corruption, censorship.
2. Crimes by Security Forces: Genocide, torture.
3. Economic Crimes: Violating workers’ rights.
4. Social/Cultural Crimes: Institutional racism.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Comprehensive typology of state crime.

*	Weaknesses: Overlaps between categories can complicate analysis.
46
Q

International Law and State Crime:

A

Sociologist: Franko Aas

Point: Globalisation increases the visibility of state crimes but international enforcement mechanisms remain limited.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights the role of international scrutiny in addressing state crime.

*	Weaknesses: Enforcement is hampered by political alliances and lack of universal jurisdiction.
47
Q

Human Rights and State Crime:

A

Sociologist: Schwendinger and Schwendinger

Point: State crimes should be defined as violations of basic human rights, such as freedom, equality, and dignity.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Broadens the scope of criminology to include non-legal harms.

*	Weaknesses: “Human rights” can be subjective and culturally specific.
48
Q

Spiral of Denial:

A

Sociologist: Stanley Cohen

Point: States deny crimes through a “spiral of denial”:
1. It didn’t happen.
2. If it happened, it’s not a crime.
3. Even if it’s a crime, it was justified.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights how states manipulate public perception.

*	Weaknesses: Focuses on rhetoric, less on systemic solutions.
49
Q

Authoritarian Personality:

A

Sociologist: Adorno et al.

Point: Certain individuals, especially in hierarchical regimes, are more likely to commit state crimes due to unquestioning obedience.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Links personality traits to participation in state crimes like genocide.

*	Weaknesses: Overemphasises individual psychology and ignores structural factors.
50
Q

Crimes of Obedience:

A

Sociologist: Kelman and Hamilton

Point: State crimes occur due to individuals following orders, driven by:
1. Authorisation: Acts are approved by authority.
2. Routinisation: Actions become normalised.
3. Dehumanisation: Victims are seen as “other.”

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Explains how ordinary people can commit atrocities.

*	Weaknesses: Lacks focus on the state’s responsibility for creating such systems.
51
Q

Genocide as State Crime:

A

Sociologist: Bauman

Point: Genocide is enabled by modernity, bureaucracy, and rationalisation, turning mass killing into an “efficient process.”

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Links modern state structures to systematic crimes like genocide.

*	Weaknesses: Fails to explain spontaneous violence in less bureaucratic states.
52
Q

State-Corporate Crime:

A

Sociologist: Kramer and Michalowski

Point: State crimes often involve collusion with corporations, e.g., environmental harm or human rights abuses for economic gain.

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Highlights the interplay between state and corporate power.

*	Weaknesses: Hard to hold corporations accountable due to legal complexities.
53
Q

War Crimes:

A

Sociologist: Hillyard et al.

Point: War crimes include illegal wars, targeting civilians, or using banned weapons, often justified by the state as “self-defence.”

Evaluation:
* Strengths: Recognises the link between international conflict and state crime.

*	Weaknesses: Enforcement by international bodies (e.g., ICC) is often weak.