Clinical Trial Design Flashcards

1
Q

why are clinical trials important

A

they provide evidence which influences medical practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

4 examples of drug treatments based on trial evidence

A

MI
stroke
cancers
rheumatoid arthritis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

investigating potential drugs (5)

A
  • does it work
  • what dose is therapeutic
  • what dose is toxic
  • is it safe
  • is it necessary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

problems with observational studies (3)

A

correlation vs causation false + ves

replication is difficult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

why conduct robust clinical trials

A

what works in theory might not be best in practice

e. g. high [oxygen] in premature babies - found to be harmful tonsillectomy
- generally unnecessary bypass surgery vs coronary artery stenting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Clinical trials are regulated by

A

MHRA- tests efficacy and safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

stages in development (4)

A

drug discovery

preclinical development

clinical development

(volunteer studies, phase i)phase ii, phase iii, phase iv

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

pre clinical development (3)

A
  • Animal pharmacology (dose, adverse effects)

* Animal toxicology (teratogenicity, fertility, mutagenicity)- Tissue culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

clinical development: phase i

A
  • Clinical pharmacology in normal volunteers generating pharmacokinetic, metabolic and pharmacodynamic data
  • Usually involves around 100 subjects
  • Certain drugs e.g. cytotoxics will bypass this phase e.g.

• TEGENERO DRUG: 8 paid volunteers
○ 6 given active drug IV, 2 given placebo
○ Regulated environment, according to protocol approved by MHRA

Developed multiple organ failure in an unpredicted biological action of the drug in humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

phase ii

A
  • Clinical investigation to confirm kinetics and dynamics in patients (who may have liver/renal/GI absorption problems)
  • Provides some evidence of efficacy and identifies a likely dosage rangeInvolves up to 500 patients
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

phase iii

A
  • Formal therapeutic trials where efficacy will be established and evidence of safety obtained i.e. does it work for the condition we are testing
  • Involves 1000 - 3000 patientsAt completion, all data (pre-clinical, pharmaceutical and clinical data) is submitted as an application to the regulatory authority for a license to sell the drug
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

phase iv

A

• Post-marketing surveillance to produce evidence of long term safety May involve tens or hundreds of thousands of patients world wide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

clinical trials

A

pilot studies

double blind/single blind

retrospective/prospective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

pilot studies

A

not to estimate outcome but to test study design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

double blind

A

patient and doctor blinded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

single blind

A

patient blinded

17
Q

prospective

A

protocol decided before hand

18
Q

retrospective

A

less good as open to bias

19
Q

placebo controlled study

A

100 patients
50 drug
50 placebo

compare outcome in the 2 groups

20
Q

comparison with other therapy

A

100 patients
50 study drug
50 comparative therapy

compare end pointsis one better than the other

21
Q

cross over design

A

100 patients
50 study drug
50

comparative therapy cross over at e.g. 8 wks (wash out period)compare outcomes A vs B in same patient

22
Q

randomised clinical trial

A

patients assigned at random to either treatment or control this is the ideal method

23
Q

disadvantages of randomised control clinical trials (4)

A
  • Generalisable results?
    • Subjects may not represent general patient population
    • Tend to be better at complying - Recruitment
    • Twice as many new patients needed for the study
  • Acceptability of randomisation process
    • Some physicians will refuse (PFO closure)
    • Some patients will refuse (want treatment)
    Administrative complexity (randomisation methods etc)
24
Q

commonly used phase iii designs (9)

A
  • Parallel
  • Withdrawal
  • Group/cluster
  • Randomised consent
  • Cross over
  • Factorial
  • Large simple
  • Equivalence/non-inferiority Sequential
25
superiority vs non-inferiority trials
- SUPERIORITY: show that new treatment is better than the control or standard (maybe a placebo) - NON-INFERIORITY: show that the new treatment: A. Is'nt worse than the standard by more than some margin B. Would have beaten placebo is a placebo arm had been included (regulatory)
26
how to design a study
- Randomised double blind comparison of angiotensin II antagonist vs atenolol in the treatment of hypertension - 12 wk comparison - End points (should be as simple as possible) • Death • Number of hospital admissions • Lowering of blood pressure • Compare with pain control or change in mood - Hypothesis - Number of subjects - Safety endpoints? - A good design will give robust results
27
designing a study
- Choice of subjects: need enough to be able to detect/reject a difference between the 2 groups, statistical design is very important - Number of patients also depends on: frequency of outcome measurement (A v B in mild hypertensives, BP reduction: 200 patients over 12 wks; stroke reduction: thousands of patients over 5 yrs) - Choice of control drug: placebo, drug of known efficacy - Choice of patients: age and sex matched, race, other diseases and drugs, compliance - Exclusion and selection criteria: exclude pregnant women, children, seriously ill patients, elderly (?), patients at risk of side effects
28
challenges in studies (2)
- Declining renal function Multiple morbidities: patients over 60 usually have multiple conditions
29
analysis and interpretation
- Choose a stat test - Are differences due to chance - P<0.05 usually taken as significance- Interpreting an insignificant finding: • No difference or the study hasn’t found one Two treatments may be clinically effective
30
ethical issues
- Consent - Ethics committee - Placebos - Children - Study design - Policing studies - MHRA/CSM/EU - InsuranceThe law
31
all preclinical and clinical trial evidence is submitted to the ...
regulatory authority
32
post marketing surveillance
- Medicines and healthcare devices regulatory authority (MHRA) • Committee of safety of medicines- Yellow card systemGP, hospital doctors and pharmacists
33
why do we do clinical trials
- Patients may get better or worse despite drug therapy - There may be a placebo effect - Clinical practice needs to be evidence basedDrug companies have competing interests
34
important clinical trials
4Scare trial
35
scandinavian simvastatin survival trial
4444 patients with angina or post MI, serum cholesterol 5.5 -8.0mmol/L, simvastatin 20mg or placebodeath lower 4%, coronary events lower 9% in simvastatin
36
cholesterol and recurrent events trial
does lowering normal cholesterol give benefit, 4000 patients, post MI, 'normal cholesterol', pravastatin 40mg or placeboStroke incidence reduced by 31%, p = 0.03