Chapter 5 Flashcards
Relationship of violence and aggression
- violence is?
- ex of relationship
- Violence and aggression go hand in hand but not all agression is violent in physical sense; all violent behavior is aggressive
− destructive physical aggression intentionally directed at harming others; may be methodical or random, sustained or fleeting, intesive or uncontrolled; it always harms the vic or is intented to do so.
− Ex: spreading malicious info about someone or stalking are aggressive, one is criminal but neither is violent
Aggression in 8 year olds
is largely unchanged well into adulthood for many children regardless of gender
Biological viewpoint of aggression
- belief
- conclusion
- animals
- Some believe aggressive behavior is biological and genetic in orgin. Supported by evidence of aggressive behaivor in animal kingdom from which it originated
- If aggression and violence is a built in genetically programmed aspect we may be forced toward a pessimistic conclusion- we can only hope to hold our natural aggressive urges and drives in check. We should design society in ways to discourage violence such as adminstering immed. Aversive consequences
- Animal aggression reflects the bio programming carried in genes to ensure survival of species
Social learning viewpoint of aggression
- belief
- conclusion
believe that while some animal species may be genetically programed to be aggressive, human beings learn from the social enviroment
- If we believe aggression is learned and influence by range of situational, social, enviro variables we can be more optimistic bc aggression is not an inevitable aspect of human life. Once we understand what major factors play roles in acquistion and maintaence we will be able to change behavior by manipulating them.
Difference in kind perspective
suggests that genetic predispositions or bio precursors of aggression have minimal influence on human behavior if any at all
Aggression
- social defintion
- passive aggression
- 2 types (distinguished by) (law)
−Social psychologists define it as the intent and attempt to harm another physically, socially, or to destroy an object
− is a special category of aggressive responses with aggressive intent but behavior is indirect (gen irrelvant when discussing crime bc concerned about behavior that manifests directly in violent or antisocial behavior)
1. hostile (expressive)
2. Instrumental aggression
- Both distinguished by their goals or rewards
- Altho psychologists make distinction between the two, the law doesn’t. However, certain factors assoc with hostile aggression (if crime is heinous fashion) can affect criminal sentence
Buss's classification - based on - Active (physical & verbal) (direct non direct) - Passive (physical & verbal) (direct and non direct)
- based on apparent motivations
1. Active:
a. Physical- direct (hitting) indirect (practical joke)
b. Verbal- direct (insulting) indirect (gossip)
2. Passive:
a. Physical- direct (obstructing passage) indirect (refusing to do task)
b. Verbal- direct (refusing to speak) indirect (refusing consent)
Hostile (expressive) aggression
- is
- behavior is
- occurs
- goal
- most include
aggression is when a person’s primary aim is to hurt or do injury to another. Behavior is intense and disorganzing emotion of anger. Occurs in response to anger-inducing conditions such as percevied insults, physical attacks, one’s own failures. Goal is to make victim suffer. (most homicides, rapes, violent crimes precipated by hostile aggression)
Instrumental aggression
- common crimes
- usual feature in?
Aggression is carried out for the primary purpose of gaining material goods or other rewards rather than for the purpose of harming the victim. Begins with competition or desire for object/status of another.
- Usually factor in robbery, burlary, larceny, white collar crimes. Usually no intent to harm although it may result in it (but intent was still insturmental)
- Instrumental aggression usually featrue of calculated murder by hired impersonal killer
Hostile-insturmental dichotomy
- criticism
- Some scholars find faut with strict hostile-instrumental dichotomy. Bushman and Anderson point out that it fails to take into account that many aggressive acts multiple motives. They can be better understood on continumm that goes from controlled aggression to automatic (impulsive) aggression
Bandura- definition of aggression/suggestion
- text definition of aggression
−noted most defs of aggression imply that it revolves around the behaviors and intention residing within perpetrator. He suggests that an adequate def must consider both the injurous behavior of the perp and the social judgment of the victim
−as behavior perpetrated or attemtped with the intention of harming another physically or psychologically (as opposed to socially) or to destroy object
Perspective on aggression:
- nature vs. nurture
− According to first perspective, humans are programmed aggressive to defend themselves
− The second states humans become violenct by acquiring aggressive modles and actions from society
Psychoanalytic view
- human nature
- freud (humans)
- model
- tirades
- freud (all violence)
- children
- view on controlling crime
−assume that humans by nature always prone to aggressive impulses and likely to commit violent acts if impulses not managed
− Freud stated that humans susceptible from birth to buildup of aggressive energy which must be dissipated or drained off before reacing dangerous levels (hydraulic model)
− Psychodynamic or hydraulic model is view that if excessive pressure accumaltes in the human psyche an explosion likely to occur as seen in tirades that involve violenve
− According to Freudian perspective those who have tirades ar blowing off excess steam or aggressive energy
−violence in all forms is the aggressive energy discharge. Internal energy accums to dangerous levels when ppl have not discharged it through catharsis. Catharsis accomplished by behaviors or may occur vicariously
− Freudian position predicts that children who partake in or watch sports will be less aggressive
−human must be provided with muliple channels for catharsis (rec centers) and ppl must learn to dissipate aggression in socially approved ways. Psychotherapy is one way.
Ethological view
- ethology
- theorist (aggression is?)
- territoriality
- aggression amongst species
- ritualized aggression
−study of animal behavior and compares that behavior to human behavior.
− Theologist Lorenz believed aggression is an inherited instict of both humans and animals and its main purpose is the enable the animal/human to defend territory with food, water, room to reproduce. If terrirtory is violated, the genetic programmed response is to attack
−Territoriality is the tendency to attack space violators; it is an innate propensity developed thru lengthy complex process of evolution
− This aggressive behavior among the same species (intraspecific aggression) prevents overcrowding and ensures the best mates for the young
- is intricate communication system in the animal kingdom; a way of intraspecies aggression by complicated displays of force and suporeriority like showing teeth.
Difference in degree
- is?
- Lorenz: humans in evolution
is the ethologist’s main belief; a Darwinian perspective that humans are intimately tied to their animal ancestry in important and significant ways and differ only in the extent to which they have developed through the evolutionary process.
− Lorenz’s said humans have outdistanced the evolutionary process of inhibiting aggression. Instead of natural weapons and species preserving function of ritualized aggression, humans developed technological weaponry. The reason humans kill others is because they have not developed function of species preserving ritualized aggression
Ethology view
- criticism
- today’s evidence
- ethology’s new field
- see aggression as?
−has not been supported by research. One reason is bc it relies on strong analogy between animals and humans. Research has yet to find any instinctive genetically programmed behavior determinant in humans. The capacity to exercise control over ones own thought processes, motivation is dinstinctvly a human charactersitc.
−To date there is little evidence that humans are innately dangerous and brutal by instinct
− Evolutionary psychology is what ethology has evolved into; it’s the study of behavior using principles of natural selection. Argues that evolutionary history provides framework for understanding cognition and behavior.
− Evo psychologists don’t see aggression as pathology but something normal
Frustration-aggression hypothesis
- theorist (aggression is)
- criticism
- revision
- aggression may be (2)
- anger
According to Dollard those who are frustrated, annoyed, threatened, will be aggressive since aggression is a natural almost automatic response to frustrating circumstances. “Aggression is always a consequence of frustration”
- Hypothesis was simple so drew much research as well as criticism. Difficult to determine what frustration was and how it could be measured
Researchers found aggression more complex and frustration doesn’t always lead to aggression some respond diff
−Leo Berkowitz revised this theory by stating frustration increases probability that person becomes angry and acts aggressively; frustation facilitates aggression.
- Aggression may be overt (physical/verbal) or implicit (wishing someones dead).
- Anger is not the only emotion that leads to aggression; Aversive conditions like pain, or pleasant like sexual arousal may also lead to it.
Revision of hypothesis
- imp part of revision
- deprivation
- responses to frustration (reps)
- revised hypo steps (3)
- aggressive behavior depends on (3)
− is concept of anticpated goals or expectations. When a behavior directed at a specific goal is interrupted, frustration likeley to result. Thus the person may have been expecting attainment of goal.
− Deprivation of goods will not necessarily lead to frustration. Ppl in deprived conditions may not be frustrated unless they actually expect something better.
− Aggression is not only response to frustration; ppl learn others such as withdrawl, trying to alter situation by getting out of it, or comprismising. Represents learning and individ diffs in responses to frustration.
1. Person blocked from obtaining expected goal
2. Frustration results generating anger
3. Anger predisoposes person to act aggressviely
− depends on learning history, interp of event, individ way of responding. Also on presecence of aggression eleciting stimuli
Berkowitz emphasized 2 imp components of hypo
- aggression generated when (2)
- more likely to act aggressive when?
- frustration generates a?
aggressive behavior will be generated
1. To the extent that a person percieves the mistreatment as intentional
2. To the degree that the frustration experienced was aversive
−if they believe the blocking of the goal was intentional rather than if unintentional. Therefore, self-restraint comes into play when ppl think they have been delibertaely mistreated
−frustrations gen a neg affect which refers to emotional state ppl seek to lessen or eliminate
Weapons effect
- Berkowitz noted
- suggests firearms are
- weapons effect is
- conclusion of effect
− noted that prescnece of aggressive stimuli in external enviro increases prob of aggressive response; a weapon is a good example of such a stimulus
−are a cond. stimulus were weapons conjure aggressive assocs facilitating overt aggression. Sight of weapon will elicit ideas, images, expressive reactions linked with aggression in past
-Suggestion that the mere presence of a weapon leads a witness or victim to concentrate on the weapon itself rather than other features of the crime.
- cue effect occurs more strongly when subjects have been neg aroused before exposure to cues
Cognitive-Neoassociation Model
- is? emphasized?
- stages (early/later)
-is the reformulation of berk’s frustration hypothesis in which he emphasized cognitive factors.
- During early stages, aversive event produces negative affect (discomfort). This neg affect maybe due to physical pain or psych discomfrot (verbal insult). Neg affects give rise almost automatically to variety of feelings, thoughts, assoc with flight (fear) and fight (anger). During this early stage, mediating cognitive processes have little influcnce.
− Most of us get past the initial stages however. During later stages, cognitve appraisal happens and may influence emotional reactions after the initial auto responses. These cognitions mediate and evaluate proper course of action. Pple make causal attributions, think about nature of feelings and try to control their actions
Excitation Transfer Theory
- by?
- explains? based on?
- transfer likely if?
propsed by Zillmann to explain how physio arousal can generlize from one situation to another.
-Based on assumption that physio arousal dissipates slowly over time. Combo of presexisting arousal plus anger generated in new situation increases likelihood of agression.
− Transfer of arousal likely to occur if person is unware that they are carrying arousal from prev situation to new one.
Displaced Aggression Theory
- sim to
- by? states?
- displaced aggression occurs?
- triggered displaced
- displaced agg response is?
- rumination
- Closely related to excitation transfer theory
−by Bushman; states aggression is displaced when the target is innocent of any wrongdoing but simply in wrong place at wrong time
− when you cant aggress against source of provocation so you are aggressive towards innocent or mildly provoking person
− is a phenomenon where following an initial provocation, target comits a minor provocation, the triggering event, which in turn promts an aggressive response
− The displaced aggression response is usally far exceeding expected response of minor provocation but prob in proportion to percieved severilty of initial provocation
− Rumination is self-focused attention toward ones thoughts and feelings. It can maintain angry feelings over period of time. Ruminative thoughts can promote subsequent aggression against someone
Aggressive Driving and Road Rage:
- road rage’s theory
- both are?
1. road rage
2. aggressive driving (exs) - road rage cause by?
- agg driving caused by?
- illustrated in displaced agg theory
- different
1. was termed in 1980s; it an incident where angry motereist intintionally injures or kills another person in response to dispute; provocation maybe real or imagined. Can also include when motorist drives into building
2. is usually considered less serious; result of motorist becoming impatient or frustrated and often not direct result of the behavior of another motorist. Instead often result of triggered displaced aggression. Aggressive driver was already angry at something so takes it out on the road
Exs: tailgating, cutting, speeding, running red lights
− road rage is often result of interpretating the actions of others as personal affrants which require retiliating. - Aggressive driving often caused by traffic congestion, travel impedance, time urgency