Chapter 4-Assessment, Diagnosis, Treatment Flashcards
Psychodiagnosis
Categorizing individuals based on behaviors or symptoms
Disorders
Clusters of behaviors that seem to reliably go together in a given culture
*highly subjective
Clinical assessment
Determine whether/how/why a person is behaving abnormally & how to help them
Personality assessment
Assess personality and probe for unconscious conflicts
Behavioral assessment
Observe & record the frequency & duration of target behavior
Direct overt behavior observation
Advantages to classification
- Can potentially PREDICT future behaviors
- Means of COMMUNICATION amongst clinicians
- Provides categories for RESEARCH
- Provides basis for epidemiological RECORDS to increase understanding
Disadvantages to classification
- Puts a label on people
- Can produce social stigma
- can result in self fulfilling prophecy (increase severity of symptoms) - Categories are not perfect and may overlap across disorders
- Diagnoses may not be reliable
- different clinicians come to different conclusions
- variations in client behavior over time - Subjectivity of diagnostic categories
Multi-axial approach (DSM 3-4)
Axis 1: primary diagnosis
Axis 2: personality disorders, mental retardation
Axis 3: relevant physical disorders or medical conditions
Axis 4: psychosocial and environmental stressors
Axis 5: global assessment of functioning
Changed to DSM 5
- Moved from categorical (like 3 symptoms of these, 2 of these, etc) to dimensional scales (none, slight, mild, moderate, severe)
Purpose: to increase reliability & validity
- Eliminated multiaxial system-collapsed first 3 axes (diagnosed, severity, additional info)
- Added “causal specifiers (biol/genetic, environmental, developmental, cultural, social, behavioral)
- Cultural sections include how they vary across cultures, genders, age groups
Criticisms to changes of DSM 5
Might decrease reliability & validity
Does it pathologize previously normal behavior?
Reliability
Consistency
- Is the diagnosis of the client consistent with other clinicians?
- Is the diagnosis consistent across time?
Validity
Accuracy
- Does it group people together whose symptoms have the same cause
- Does it group people together for whom the same treatments are effective?
Culture and assessment issues
- Constructs may not be equivalent cross-culturally
Ex. “Intelligence”, collectivism vs individualism - Scores on some measures may not be comparable to the same scores obtained on a different cultural sample
Rhee et al self esteem study
Ex of how scores may not be equivalent cross culturally
Various Chinese individual (those who have always lived in china, been abroad, recent immigrants to US, etc)
Found self esteem scores went up the longer they had been in western culture
Culture & diagnosis
Behaviors associated with a disorder in one culture may not be abnormal in another culture
Therapeutic interview
Includes both assessment and therapy
Assessment interview
Obtain overall picture of the person
Includes assessment of both verbal and non-verbal behaviors
Structured interviews
Standardized both in terms of items and administration
Pre-established questions & format
Requires single word or numerical answers (close ended)