Chapter 4-Assessment, Diagnosis, Treatment Flashcards

1
Q

Psychodiagnosis

A

Categorizing individuals based on behaviors or symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Disorders

A

Clusters of behaviors that seem to reliably go together in a given culture

*highly subjective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Clinical assessment

A

Determine whether/how/why a person is behaving abnormally & how to help them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Personality assessment

A

Assess personality and probe for unconscious conflicts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Behavioral assessment

A

Observe & record the frequency & duration of target behavior

Direct overt behavior observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Advantages to classification

A
  1. Can potentially PREDICT future behaviors
  2. Means of COMMUNICATION amongst clinicians
  3. Provides categories for RESEARCH
  4. Provides basis for epidemiological RECORDS to increase understanding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Disadvantages to classification

A
  1. Puts a label on people
    - Can produce social stigma
    - can result in self fulfilling prophecy (increase severity of symptoms)
  2. Categories are not perfect and may overlap across disorders
  3. Diagnoses may not be reliable
    - different clinicians come to different conclusions
    - variations in client behavior over time
  4. Subjectivity of diagnostic categories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Multi-axial approach (DSM 3-4)

A

Axis 1: primary diagnosis
Axis 2: personality disorders, mental retardation
Axis 3: relevant physical disorders or medical conditions
Axis 4: psychosocial and environmental stressors
Axis 5: global assessment of functioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Changed to DSM 5

A
  1. Moved from categorical (like 3 symptoms of these, 2 of these, etc) to dimensional scales (none, slight, mild, moderate, severe)

Purpose: to increase reliability & validity

  1. Eliminated multiaxial system-collapsed first 3 axes (diagnosed, severity, additional info)
  2. Added “causal specifiers (biol/genetic, environmental, developmental, cultural, social, behavioral)
  3. Cultural sections include how they vary across cultures, genders, age groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Criticisms to changes of DSM 5

A

Might decrease reliability & validity

Does it pathologize previously normal behavior?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reliability

A

Consistency

  1. Is the diagnosis of the client consistent with other clinicians?
  2. Is the diagnosis consistent across time?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Validity

A

Accuracy

  1. Does it group people together whose symptoms have the same cause
  2. Does it group people together for whom the same treatments are effective?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Culture and assessment issues

A
  1. Constructs may not be equivalent cross-culturally
    Ex. “Intelligence”, collectivism vs individualism
  2. Scores on some measures may not be comparable to the same scores obtained on a different cultural sample
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rhee et al self esteem study

A

Ex of how scores may not be equivalent cross culturally

Various Chinese individual (those who have always lived in china, been abroad, recent immigrants to US, etc)

Found self esteem scores went up the longer they had been in western culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Culture & diagnosis

A

Behaviors associated with a disorder in one culture may not be abnormal in another culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Therapeutic interview

A

Includes both assessment and therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Assessment interview

A

Obtain overall picture of the person

Includes assessment of both verbal and non-verbal behaviors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Structured interviews

A

Standardized both in terms of items and administration

Pre-established questions & format
Requires single word or numerical answers (close ended)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Intelligence tests

A

Measure intellectual functioning & speed of cognitive functioning

  • verbal & spatial reasoning/functioning
  • highly standardized in administration/scoring
  • subtest scores “scatter” (I.e. Verbal comprehension, working memory, processing speed etc)
20
Q

Objective personality assessment

A

Yields an objective score

Ex: MMPI-500+ T/F numbers, yields a visual profile of traits

21
Q

Projective personality assessment

A

Psychodynamic orientation, more subjective

Assumes: given an ambiguous stimulus, and individual will project unconscious elements of their personality onto the stimulus

Ex: Rorschach inkblot test-how long they look, what orientation, unusual emotions expressed

Thematic Apperception Test- ask person to weave story around picture

Children’s Apperceptions Test-child weaves story around picture

22
Q

Cognitive assessment

A

Measure thoughts, beliefs, attitudes, etc

through questionnaires, interviews, self monitors, etc

23
Q

Relational assessment

A

Emphasis on CONTEXT of behavior

24
Q

Bodily assessment

A

Measure of physiological functioning (often arousal states)

e.g. Skin conductance, BP, etc.

25
Test-retest reliability
Scores obtained at one time are consistent with scores obtained at different time
26
Internal consistency
Consistency within your measure Feel confident that all items in measure yield similar results (rule out rogue items)
27
Interrater reliability
Consistency in results obtained when different people administer the test
28
Construct validity
Is measure accurately depicting the COMPLEX PHENOMENON I set out to measure
29
Predictive validity
Do scores obtained accurately predict the behavior that is supposedly being measured? Ex: SAT, GRE
30
Content validity
Does it cover all the important aspects of what is being measured?
31
Face validity
Does the measure appear to measure what is is supposed to?
32
Concurrent validity
Degree measured from one tool agrees with other tools
33
Personality inventory
Wide range of questions about behavior, beliefs, feelings
34
Response inventories
Asked to provide detailed information, but focus on one specific area of functioning Affective: severity of emotions Social skills: indicate how they would react in certain social situations
35
Psychological tests
Measure physiological responses as possible indications of psychological problems
36
Neurological tests
Measure brain structure/activity directly Ex: EEG, neuroimaging
37
Reactivity
Effect of observation on behavior | People will change if known they are being observed
38
Evidence based treatments
Treatments supported by empirical study
39
Scientist-practitioner gap
Some studies highly supported by research, but practitioners have experience in the field *may depend on specific client
40
Effectiveness of treatment
1. People receiving treatment have better outcomes than 75% of those not receiving treatment 2. No particular therapy more effective than others 3. Certain therapies better for certain problems
41
Important therapist characteristics
1. Give feedback to clients 2. Help client to focus on thoughts/behaviors 3. Pays close attention to therapist/client interactions 4. Promotes self master in clients
42
Best therapy for phobias/some anxiety disorders
Behavior therapies
43
Best therapy for psychotic disorders
Meds, CBT, ACT
44
Best therapy for depression
CBT, meds* for sever depression
45
Telehealth programs
Online therapy | Some success in serious mental illnesses (psychotic, bipolar, etc)