Chapter 2: The Evolution of Emotion Flashcards
Functional (1 of 3 must be met!)
- Increases the probability of your survival (and thus, chance of reproduction)
- Increases the probability of your ancestor’s survival (and therefore, the reproduction of those that share your DNA)
- Increases the number of offspring you have
Natural Selections
genes that are more advantageous at a given time become more represented in a population while genes that are less advantageous become less represented
Byproducts
traits that are somehow linked to an advantageous trait, but are neutral and therefore do not get weeded out (liver is brown, but does a good job! internal organ colour is neutral)
Intrapersonal
within a person; in relation to emotions, an emotion that helps the person experience it change the stimulus to increase survival
Ultrasocial
conducting almost everything through a social structure in life (e.g. ants, bees, people)
Social Functions of Emotion
they increase the interpersonal ties a person has, therefore extending a network of those that increase their survival
Affect Infusion Model
emotional feelings can impact our cognitive processes
e.g. steep hill when sad, manageable hill when happy
Gray’s Approach-Avoidance Model
People respond to stimuli with either an approach or avoid mentality
Approach-Avoidance vs Affect Infusion
- AA doesn’t equate avoidance with negative valence emotions
- AA is more instinctive
Superordinate Neural Programmes Theory
activated to preserve fitness in a situation; has a basic/discrete approach where emotions are on a track (main emotion) with many subroutines.
e.g. frustration when losing a game, rage when seeing someone you hate, may call upon some of the same subroutines but have the same superordinate programme “anger”
Ellsworth and Nesse’s Phylogeny of Emotions
The family tree of emotions where the more base are toward the trunk and the branches show that as we evolved, we secured more emotional diversity to deal with a larger number of situations
Methodological Considerations
- Should be universal, and thus shared with descendants that share a common ancestor with humans
- Must use the most plausible deduction!!
- CANNOT POST HOC THEORISE
Natural Kind
have distinctions that are not human made. e.g. the difference between a tree and the sky
Human Kind
have no intrinsic distinction besides what humans have assigned, and varies across cultures. e.g. the concept of a “pet”