Chapter 19: The Islamic World Powers Flashcards
Tamerlane(7)
14th century CE, Central Asia 1.Built a Central Asian empire after Mongol Empire deteriorated, with a capital at Samarkand.
2. Overall: attempted to mimic the achievments of Chinggis Khan. 3.Appointed lords to rule individual provinces of the empire whoused the existing political structures to do so.
4.After Tamerlane’s death, problems with his succession led to the collapse of the empire.
C/C: Compare: Zhou rulers in China, who used family members to rule provinces throughout China.
Compare:used similar terror tactics for conquer as the Mongols had previously.
7.Continuity: using mongol technique of dividing territory among lords?
Nadir Shah(3)
18th century CE, Persia
- adventurer, invaded Mughal Empire (India) anddefeated Mughal army, looted (took over?) Delhi
- Stole the peacock throne (symbol of Mughal leader’s authority and prestige)
C/C: Compare: Napoleon (in terms of authority) Both conquered foreign territories. Contrast: ?
Change/cont.:
Selim II(4)
16th century CE, Ottoman Empire
- “Selim the Drunkard”
- Incompetent Ottoman sultan/factor to the deterioration of the empire
C/C: Compare: Last 3 leaders of the Safavids (?), who also were weak and led to the decline of the empire. Contrast: Shah Abbas (r. late 16th- early 17th century) led Ottoman empire to prosperity for some time (gained alliances with Europe, supported trade)
COT: Continuity:?
Change: Capable leaders (Selim I) to incapapable leaders(Selim II) due to change in methods of choosing succession(see ‘Ottoman decline’ card)
Devshirme & Janissaries(4)
16th-20th centuryCE, Ottoman Empire
- Devshirme- process where gov’t agents made Christian youths into Islamic slaves.
- Minority ofChristian youths were educated for gov’t service.
- Most became Janissaries (individuals in the sultan’s elite slave army).
- The sultan’s slaves had social mobility and opportunities, and could often become part of the ruling class.
C/C: Compare: Rebellions of both Janissaries in Egypt against Ali and in Ottoman Empire against Tanzimat. Both came from parts of society which were not expected(Janisarries are Muslim soldiers who were formerly Christian and Sepoys were Native Indians who worked for the British.)
COT:
Concubinage inthe Ottoman Empire(6)
15th-20th century CE, Ottoman Empire
1.Concubine- a woman who is a spouse of a lower status than a man’s wife.
2.Traditional for sultan to have concubines, rather than legal wives.(Hürrem- the wife of Suleiman-was an exception)
3.Had no direct political authority.
4.Raised the male children of their man until the boy grew up, and either succeeded the sultan, or was subject to fratricide (killed by a brother).
C/C: Similarity: To concubines of China, the Middle East Contrast:?
COT: continuity: concubinage in the Abassid Caliphate?,previous islamic states/Caliphates?
Sepoys(4)
18th century, India (Mughal Empire)
1.Sepoys-Native Indian troops trained as infantrymen (defender of an army) by the British East India Trading Company factories in India.
2.Protected company factory forts and citizens that fled to them for protection when conflict erupted.
3. Gradually led Britain to gained political authority in India.
C/C: Compare: Rebellions of both Janissaries in Egypt against Ali and in Ottoman Empire against Tanzimat. Both came from parts of society which were not expected(Janisarries are Muslim soldiers who were formerly Christian and Sepoys were Native Indians who worked for the British.)
:
COT:Continuity: Indian citizens continued to be of service in the British military in the 19th century when they served inBritain’s military after India became a British colony.
Sikhs(8)
16th century, Islamic states (Mughal India)
1. Believed God did not distinguish between Muslims and Hindus, but saw everyone as his children.
2.Acts: -rejected caste system -forbade alchohol and tobacco
C/C: Similarity: Religious sects that accepted other belief systems such as Buddhism andConfucianism. Contrast: Hindus in India accepted the caste system (India’s social system)
COT:Continuity: Islamic states continued to have various branches of faith.
Safavid Empire(7)
16th-18th century, Persia
1.Founded by Ismail(16th), who declared himself the Shah (king)
2.Shi’ia sect was official religion
3.Ismail granted grazing land to the Qizilbash(sufis who were loyal to the Safavid State)
4.In return the Qizilbash provided military troops
5.Supported Shi’ite faith by importing Shi’ite ulama(scholars), and persecuting Sunni ulama.
6. Under Shah Abbas(17th)
-army of slaves
-promotion of Persian language, carpet weaving and beautiful gardens.
7.Alliance with Europeans against Ottomans.
C/C: Comparable to Ottoman and Mughal empires ( all are Muslim-based, all three had thriving economies, authoirative, dominant rulers: S-Shah Abbas, O- Sultan Mehmet II, and M-Akbar) ; also compare to France under Louis XIV, Japan in the Tokugawa regim or China under the Ming and Qing(because of all things listed for the Muslim Empires above). Contrast:?
COT:
Ottoman Empire(6)
15th-18th century, Antolia (Turkey)=origin
1.15th century captured Constantinople and renamed it Istanbul (supported Africans against Spanish reconquista)2.Sultan-i-Rum-Title of Ottoman sultans “sultan of Rome” such as Mehmet.
3.Under Mehmet II:Ottoman military success due to advanced technology such as gunpowder.
-Took control of much of the midddle East, Balkans, and Crimean peninsula (multinational empire)
4. 16th century alliance with France and German protestant princes against Safavids (were allied with Habsburgs)5.Sultans often transplanted people into conquered terrritories.
C/C:COT: ? Compare to Safavid and Mughal Empires.
MughalEmpire(7)
15th-18th century, India
1. founded by Babur, who expanded his small Afghanistan empire into India.(later lost control of Afghani territory)
2.Akbar-
-expanded Mughal Empire into most of India
-almost unstoppablearmy
-created bureaucracy with 4 co-equal ministersto control various aspects of society.
-ruled through provincial governors
3.Jahan (17th century) & Aurangzeb (17-18th century)
-expanded the MughalEmpire toits greatest extent in India, regardless of internal resistance in India.
C/C: similarity: Tamerlane’s empire, in the methods of ruling through provincial governors. Or Qin dynasty in the will/ability to undergo large building projects (Taj Mahal, and Great Wall)
COT:continuity:
Role of Coffee in the Muslim world(6)
15th century, Islamic world
1. Coffee in the 15th century encountered religious and governmental opposition Because:
- was seen as intoxicating (therefore breaking Islamic law)
-was an innovation in the Muslim world (not Muslim tradition)
-coffeehouses encouraged political discussion
-coffeehouses (ex: like bars) encouraged immoral behaviour.
2. coffee was generally accepted in the 16th century
C/C:
COT: Cont.- coffee became popular in the Muslim world yet still is popular today (present)
Suleiman The Magnificent (aka Law Giver)
16th century, Ottoman Empire
1. Expanded Empire into sothern Europe and created an centralized bureaucracy.
2.Modernized Ottoman mililtary (crushed the Hungarians in 16th century)
3.Made law system based on Islamic law
4. Patron of the arts and had religious tolerance.
C/C: Contrast to Ivan the Terrible (brought under Russian control. Many Ottomans were against Ivan and his political authority)
COT:
Decline of the Safavid Empire (4)
18th century, Persia
1.Leaders lost central authority
2.Shi’ite institutions gained increasing authority
3.Decline in military led to foreign aggression (from Afganistan and Ottomans)4. C/C: Similarity: Mughal and Ottomans, conflict over succession and poor leadership led to decline of empire.
COT:
Decline of the Ottoman Empire(7)
18th century, Ottoman territories
1.Weak leaders (Selim II) due to abandoning past methods of choosing Sultan succession.
2.Traditions were abandoned: succession, devshirme
3.Revolts due to economic issues and plague.
4.Lack of military capability (poor technology and relied on mercenaries), led to loss of territory to Europe.
5.Economic problems:
-Lost major European provinces which had provided tax revenues. -Rising population without economic growth(unemployment)
6. C/C: Similarity: Safavid and Mughal, conflict over succession and poor leadership led to decline.
COT:
Decline of Mughal Empire (5)
18th century, India
1.Struggle over succession.
2.military conflict with Marathas (Hindu group) in south India, which prevented Mughal expansion.
3.Provincial governors began to rule independently.
4. Nadir Shah invasion.
C/C:Similarity: Safavid & Ottoman, conflict over succession and poor leadership led to decline.Also the fall of the Ming(mid-17th) or Qing(early 20th) Dynasties of China
COT: