chapter 16, 17, 18, EXAM Flashcards
FRACKING (HYDRAULIC FRACTURING)
- OLD TECHNIQUE TO INCREASE OIL PRODUCTION FROM WORKED OUT OIL WELLS (NO LONGER GIVING OIL TRADITIONALLY)
- WATER LACED W/ CHEMICALS IS PUMPED DOWN THE WELL TO FRACTURE THE SHALE AND RELEASES THE GAS WHICH THEN CAN BE PUMPED UP
FRACKING: PROS AND CONS
PRO:
-INCREASES THE PRESSURE = INCREASE FLOW RATE OF MATERIALS
CON:
-METHANE LEAKS AND CONTAMINATES GROUNDWATER
NATURAL GAS
-EXSISTS IN GASEOUS DEPOSITS AND AS A COMPOUND OF PETROLEUM
80-95% METHANE
5-20% ETHANE, PROPANE AND BUTANE
NATURAL GAS PROS
- HIGH NET ENERGY
- LOW COST W HUGE SUBSIDIES
- LESS AIR POLLUTION (LOW CO2 EMISSIONS)
- LOW LAND USE
- EASILY TRANSPORTED BY PIPELINE
NATURAL GAS CONS
- NONRENEWABLE
- STILL RELEASES CO2
- METHANE LEAKS
- SHIPPED AS HIGHLY EXPLOSIVE LNG
- CONTAMINATES GROUNDWATER
COAL
-SOLID FUEL FORMED PRIMARILY FROM THE REMAINS OF ANCIENT AND PRESERVED PLANTS
4 TYPES
- LIGNITE (LOW HEAT CONTENT, LOW SULFUR, SOFTEST)
- SUB-BITUMINOUS
- BITUMINOUS (HIGH HEAT CONTENT, HIGH SULFUR)
- ANTHRCITE (HIGH HEAT, LOW SULFUR, MOST CARBON)
COAL PROS
- ENERGY DENSE
- PLENTIFUL
- EASY TO EXPLOIT
- ECONOMIC COSTS LOW
- EASY TO TRANSPORT AND HANDLE
- NEEDS LITTLE REFINING
COAL CONS
- NONRENEWABLE
- MANY IMPURITIES RELEASED INTO THE ATMOSPHERE
- TRACES OF METALS AND POISONS IN AIR
- INCREASES SULFUR DIOXIDE LEVELS IN AIR
- ASH IS LEFT BEHIND
- CARBON LEADS TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- SEVERE LAND DISTURBANCE
NUCLEAR POWER
*FISSION- A NUCLEAR REACTION IN WHICH A NEUTRON STRIKES A RELATIVELY LARGE ATOMIC NUCLEUS WHICH THEN SPLITS INTO TWO MORE PARTS (URANIUM 235)
FUSION- ANUCLEAR REACTION IN WHICH LIGHTER NUCLEI ARE FORCED TOGETHER TO PRODUCE HEAVIER NUCLEI AND HEAT IS RELEASED. HOWEVER THIS HEAT IS HARD TO CONTAIN. ( SUN AND STARS )
NUCLEAR POWER PROS
- NO AIR POLLUTION
- USED TO LIMIT THE NEED FOR OIL
- LARGE FUEL SUPPLY
NUCLEAR POWER CONS
- NONRENEWABLE
- HIGH COSTS
- LOW NET ENERGY YEILD
- HIGH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (IF ACCIDENTS OCCUR)
- SUBJECT FOR TERRORISTS ATTACKS
- NO LONG TERM WAY TO STORE HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE WASTES
SOLAR CELL PROS
- RENEWABLE (REDUCES DEPENDENCE OF FOSSIL FUELS)
- FAIRLY HIGH NET ENERGY
- LOW ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
- NO CO2 EMISSIONS
- QUICK INSTALLATION
SOLAR CELL CONS
- NEEDS ACCESS TO SUN
- LOW EFFICIENCY
- NEEDS ELECTRICITY STORAGE SYSTEM OR BACKUP SYSTEM
- HIGH LAND USE AND CAN DISRUPT DESERT AREAS
- HIGH COSTS
HYDROELECTRIC POWER
- HYDROELECTRICTY: ELECTRCITY GENERATED FROM THE KINETIC ENERGY OF MOVING WATER.
- SECOND MOST COMMON FORM OF RENEWABLE ENERGY*
HYDROELECTRIC POWER PROS
- RENEWABLE (REDUCES DEPENDENCE OF FOSSIL FUELS)
- HIGH ENERGY NET GAIN
- HIGH EFFIENCEY
- PROVIDES FLOOD CONTROL
- RESERVOIRS COULD BE USED FOR IRRIGATION AND RECREATION
HYDROELECTRIC POWER CONS
- HIGH CONSTRUCTION COSTS (DAMS)
- DAMS INTERFERE WITH FISH MIGRATION
- MAY CAUSE BOAT TRAFFIC
- HIGH INTIAL CO2 BC OF CONSTRUCTION
- GEOGRAPHICALLY LIMITED
- THREAT TO RIVER ECOSYSTEMS
- DISPLACEMENT OF PEOPLE (THREE GORGES DAM, CHINA)
WIND POWER
-USING A WIND TURBINE TO CONVERT KINETIC ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
WIND POWER PROS
- RENEWABLE (REDUCES DEPENDENCE OF FOSSIL FUELS)
- HIGH NET ENERGY, HIGH EFFICIENCY
- LOW ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
- LOW CO2 EMISSIONS
- QUICK CONSTRUCTION W EASY EXPANSION
- LOW UP-FRONT COSTS
WIND POWER CONS
- VISUAL AND NOISE POLLUTION
- REQUIRES OFF GRID BATTERY SYSTEMS
- GEOGRAPHICALLY LIMITED
- MAY INTERFERE IN FLIGHTS OF MIGRATORY BIRDS