Casey Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What did Casey want to investigate?

A

Does delay of gratification in children predict impulse control abilities and sensitivity to alluring or social cues at the behavioural and neutral level when participants are in their 40’s?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What 2 groups were the participants put into when they were 4 years old, and by which test?

A

High delayers (those who could wait) and low delayers (those who couldn’t wait), using the marshmallow test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What type of experiment was used?

A

Quasi experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did cooling strategies do?

A

Meant the participants could wait longer when they were using them. They reduced appeal of the reward and took emotion away from the stimulus (instead of hot cues- emotional response).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Metcalfe & Mischel say about high/low delayers?

A

The ‘cool’ system is in the pre-frontal cortex- inferior frontal gyrus. More active in high delayers.
The ‘hot’ system is related to emotion and desires- ventral striatum. More active in low delayers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the aim?

A

To see if people who were low delayers in the marshmallow test still have low self-control in their 40’s.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the sample at the start of the study?

A

562 children initially

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the sample in experiment 1?

A

59, 40-year-olds (27 low delayers, 32 high delayers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happened in experiment 1?

A

Go/no-go task- pushed a button when they see a certain stimulus (hot and cold cues were go/no-go task). Each participant took did the 4 tasks at home on a laptop delivered to their home. Instructions appeared on the screen saying what the target stimulus was.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How long did each face appear for and how long was the interval between them?

A

They appeared for 500ms each, with a 1s interval.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are 2 results of experiment 1?

A

No significant difference between high/low delayers in terms of reaction times/accuracy in go/no-go tasks.
Participants who could delay gratification as a child had a greater ability to supress impulse control as an adult.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened in experiment 2?

A

Participants took part in the go/no-go tasks in a fMRI scanner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How long was the delay between images in experiment 2?

A

Between 2 to 14.5 seconds delay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the sample in experiment 2?

A

27, 40-year-olds (15 high delayers, 11 low delayers). 1 male excluded for poor task performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were 2 results of experiment 2?

A
  • Both scored higher on accuracy rates for go cues & low delayers had higher false alarm rates
  • Imaging showed 2 main differences between high and low delayers:
    -> low delayers had higher activity in the ventral striatum (hot cues), lower activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (cold cues)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were some conclusions?

A
  • Delay ability is hindered by alluring cues and is not a general problem with cognitive control.
  • Empirical evidence for Mischel & Metcalfe ‘hot and cold’ processing system the brain that affect self-control.