Bandura Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was the aim?

A

To investigate whether children will imitate aggressive behaviour even if in a different environment and without a model present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was a hypothesis?

A

Boys will show more imitative aggression than girls.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the research methods used?

A

Lab experiment, controlled observation, independent measures design.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the sample?

A

72 (36m, 36f) children, Stanford University Nursery School, mean age of 4 1/2 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How was the sample chosen?

A

Matched through a rating on their levels of aggression (5 point scale). The scale measured verbal and physical aggression towards inanimate objects. Randomly assigned to conditions/control group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the IV’s?

A

-Role model (aggressive/non-aggressive)
-Sex of role model (male/female)
-Sex of child (male/female)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the DV?

A

Amount of imitative behaviour + aggression, measured by a male model and another observer noting down at 5 second intervals. Physical - acts imitated, verbal - phrases imitated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were 2 results?

A

Overall boys produced more imitative aggression than girls.
Children who saw the same sex model imitated a model’s behaviour significantly more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was a conclusion?

A

Children can learn behaviour through observation and imitation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the aggression score for each child?

A
  1. Imitative aggression responses (physical/verbal)
  2. Partially imitative responses (mallet aggression, sits on bobo doll)
  3. Non-imitative responses (punches bobo doll, physical + verbal, gun play)
  4. Non-aggressive verbal responses (‘He keeps coming back for more’)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened in phase 1 (MODELLING)?

A

Each child was taken individually, model invited to join them. They were asked to design a picture using potato prints, stickers on a table in the corner. Experimenter left the room for more natural behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What happened in phase 1 (MODELLING) - aggressive condition?

A

Model played quietly for 5 minutes, turned to bobo doll, being aggressive (repeatedly punching, kicking)
Standardised comments - ‘hit him down’, ‘pow’, ‘he keeps coming back for more’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happened in phase 2 (AGGRESSIVE AROUSAL)?

A

Room contained attractive toys (fire engine, spinning top etc.), children allowed to play with toys for 2 mins, then experimenter said she decided to reserve toys for other children, moved to adjoining experimental room.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened in phase 3 (EXPERIMENTAL ROOM)?

A

1 way mirror- male model + 2nd observer present, contained aggressive toys (bobo dolls, mallet, dart gun), non-aggressive toys (tea set, ball, cars).
experimenter sat quietly working while child played for 2 mins, observer did not know which condition child had participated in, recorded every 5 seconds (time sampling).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly