Bocchiaro (2012) Flashcards

1
Q

What is social power?

A

Ability an individual has to influence another’s thoughts, feelings and behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Despite their beliefs, what do people tend to do?

A

Have strong inclinations to obey legitimate authority despite their beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are independent behaviours ?

A

Individuals behaviour in accordance to their internal attitudes, morals and beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is unjust authority?

A

Instructions that cause someone to behave in an anti-social way. People can disobey or blow the whistle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Whistleblowers

A

People who expose someone / something engaging in unlawful or immoral activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Background to Bocchiaro

A

-Milgram showed obedience to legitimate authority figures despite beliefs.
-Little research on disobedience.
-Interested in understanding personal as well as social nature of disobedience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

First Aim of Bocchiaro

A

To investigate how people deal with unethical request of study (obey, disobey, blow the whistle)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Aim of comparison study in Bocchiaro

A

How people think they behave vs how they actually behave.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3rd aim of Bocchiaro

A

Do people, who whistleblow, show different personality characteristics than those who obey.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Pre-experiment of Bocchiaro

A

8 pilot test on 92 undergraduates to assure credibility and to standardise the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Comparison group Bocchiaro

A

138 ppts given detailed description of experimental setting and asked, “what would your peers do ? “

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sample of Bocchiaro

A

149 undergraduates (96 women and 53 males) with a mean age of 20.8. SD=2.65
Paid €7 or course credit. 11 removed due to suspicions of social desirability.
Self-selected by flyers in VU university, Amsterdam.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Method of Bocchiaro

A

Controlled observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Procedure of Bocchiaro

A

Greeted by male confederate (stern), who asked for names of peers.
Told cover story on sensory deprivation.
First room and second room.
Ppts fully debriefed at the end.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

First room in Bocchiaro

A

Ppts asked to write statement to convince named students to take part in sensory deprivation study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Second room in Bocchiaro

A

Research committee forms, computer and mailbox. Told to be enthusiastic when writing ( use words such as exiting, amazing) and told not to mention the negative effects of sensory deprivation. If they wanted, they could anonymously challenge ethics by putting form in mailbox.

17
Q

Materials of Bocchiaro

A

-HEXACO
-Social value orientation= how much importance a person places on welfare. ( pro-social, individualistic, competitive)

18
Q

Open whistleblowers

A

Refused to comply with request and whistleblew.

19
Q

Anonymous whistleblowers

A

Completed the request and still whistleblew.

20
Q

Results of comparison group Bocchiaro

A

3.6% would obey
Predicted 18.8% obey
43.9% disobey
37.3% whistleblew

21
Q

Results of Bocchiaro

A

76.5% obeyed =114
14.1 disobeyed = 21
9.4 whistleblew ( 6% anonymous and 3.4% whistleblew) =14
No significant differences in gender religious affiliation.
Significant differences with faith.

22
Q

Conclusions of Bocchiaro

A

People obey authority, even unjust.
Behaviour changes in extreme circumstances that are unfamiliar.
Whistleblowers have more faith than obedient and disobedient individuals.
Situational factors offer better explanations for disobedience than dispositional.

23
Q

How does Bocchairo link to social area ?

A

Social area as it revealed high levels of obedience from unjust authority but it also looked at if people would disobey and/or whistleblow. It does not consider individual explanations.