Baron-Cohen Flashcards
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
BACKGROUND
- Autism Disorder involves 3 difficulties:
- Social communication
-Social interaction
-Social imagination
-Signs before age of 3
-Diagnosed in males more frequently
-Interested in whether any core deficit - common for people with autism - established through Sally Anne test
THEORY OF MIND
AIM
Whether adults with autism experience a deficit in Theory of Mind
SAMPLE
- 16 adults
-With autism or Aspergers Syndrome
-Recruited via adverts
-50 normal adults from Camebridge area
-10 adults with Tourettes from London
76 participants
PROCEDURE
- Participants:
Adults with autism/Asperger’s & neurotypical controls
2. Task:
Shown 36 photos of eyes only
Choose 1 of 4 words to describe the person’s emotion/thought
3. Extra tasks:
Gender recognition (from eyes)
IQ test (to control intelligence)
4. Tested:
Individually, same pictures/choices for all
FINDINGS
Autistic group scored lower on the Eyes Test
Neurotypical group scored highest
Females did better than males (on average)
No link between IQ and Eyes Test score
CONCLUSIONS
Adults with autism/Asperger’s have impaired Theory of Mind
The Eyes Test is a valid tool for measuring social understanding
Autism affects ability to read others’ emotions from subtle cues
Theory of mind definition
The ability to understand that other people have their own thoughts, feelings, beliefs, and intentions that may be different from your own.
Low ecological validity
Task (identifying emotions from still photos of eyes) is not like real-life social interaction
Real emotions involve tone, body language, movement
Limited population validity
Participants were mostly high-functioning adults with autism/Asperger’s
Doesn’t represent all people on the spectrum, especially children or those with more severe autism
concurrent validity
Eyes Test scores linked with other ToM measures, like the Happe’s Strange Stories test
But not a perfect match — ToM is complex
internal reliability
Standardised procedure (same photos, same 4 options)
Controlled conditions and instructions
external reliability
Test–retest reliability was acceptable (people scored similarly when tested again)
But interpretation of eyes could vary slightly between individuals
Nature
Suggests autism affects biological cognitive processes (e.g., Theory of Mind)
Participants had lifelong traits, implying an innate difference
Individual
Differences in Eyes Test scores were due to personal characteristics (i.e., autism/Asperger’s)
Same task, different responses
Reductionist
Focuses on one aspect of social understanding (emotion recognition from eyes)
Doesn’t consider other social/environmental factors
🧪 Psychology as a Science
Uses controlled conditions, standardised procedure, quantitative data
Can be replicated and tested
🚻 Ethical Issues
Informed consent gained
No deception or distress
Protected from harm