Cognitive Area - Moray Flashcards

1
Q

What is dichotic listening?

A

A method where two different auditory messages are played into each ear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Cherry (1953) find about selective attention?

A

Participants could shadow one message while filtering out the unattended one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What could break through the attentional filter according to Cherry’s findings?

A

Certain information, like their own name.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the main aim of Moray’s study?

A

1) To test Cherry’s findings on attention
2) Investigate what types of messages would penetrate attentional block and paled attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are affective cues?

A

Personal or emotional triggers (e.g., hearing one’s own name).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the methodology used in Moray’s study?

A

Lab Experiment using a dichotic listening task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who were the participants in Moray’s study?

A

Undergraduates and research workers from Oxford.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Experiment 1 of Moray’s study investigate?

A

Can participants recall content from the unattended ear?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the findings of Experiment 1?

A

Participants could not recall words from the rejected message.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Experiment 2 focus on?

A

Whether affective cues in the rejected message would be noticed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How much more often did participants hear their name compared to other non-affective cues?

A

20 times more often.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What conclusion was drawn from Experiment 2?

A

Affective cues can break through attention filters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was examined in Experiment 3?

A

If instructions in the unattended message would be followed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under what condition did participants follow instructions in Experiment 3?

A

When they were alerted beforehand to listen for them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is one key conclusion about attention from Moray’s study?

A

Attention is highly selective – little content from the rejected ear is remembered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What implication does Moray’s study have regarding affective cues?

A

Affective cues can break through the attentional filter.

17
Q

What is a key finding regarding instructions in Moray’s study?

A

Instructions are only effective if participants are expecting them.

18
Q

What is a strength of Moray’s study?

A

High control over variables (lab setting).

19
Q

What is a weakness of Moray’s study?

A

Low ecological validity (artificial task).

20
Q

What does Moray’s study provide support for?

A

Attention theories.

21
Q

What are real-life applications of Moray’s findings?

A

Understanding attention and perception in everyday life.

22
Q

What is the definition of selective attention?

A

Focusing on one stimulus while ignoring others.

23
Q

What is the cocktail party effect?

A

Explains why people notice their names in crowded or noisy environments.

24
Q

True or False: Moray’s study supports the idea of psychological determinism.

25
Q

Fill in the blank: The study suggests that attention is governed by _______.

A

[automatic cognitive processes]

26
Q

What does the reductionist view imply about Moray’s study?

A

It breaks attention down into cognitive processes.

27
Q

What does the holistic view suggest about attention?

A

Real-life factors influence perception.

28
Q

What is the criticism regarding the scientific aspect of Moray’s study?

A

The artificial nature of the task reduces ecological validity.

29
Q

What is one limitation of Moray’s study regarding generalisability?

A

Limited generalizability due to small sample size.

30
Q

What is one individual factor that could influence attention according to Moray’s findings?

A

Cognitive ability.

31
Q

Shadowing

A

Participants listen to 2 stimuli and repeat one loadly

32
Q

Indépendant Variable

A

Reel to Reel tape recorder with thin outputs

33
Q

Sample?

A

Undergraduate Oxford students both genders