Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Attachment

A
  • An attachment is an enduring affectional bond formed between two people
  • “Enduring”
  • “affectional”
  • “bond”
  • “formed”
  • “between two people”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Theoretical Approaches

A
  • Psychoanalytic: Freud, Erickson, Spitz
    -Mother as ‘anaclitic’ love object (feeding)
    -Drive Reduction Theories: oral need and mother fufills tem
  • Learning Theories: From Pavlov, Watson,
    -Associations from feeding relationship
    -mother gives food or whoever did
    -Importance of food/physical comfort
  • Challenges: Harlow’s work
  • Cognitive Approach: Schemas
  • Ethological Approaches
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Harry Harlow

A
  • Disproving feeding as the basis for attachment(learning/phychonalitical)
  • monkey could either eat with a wire monkey or with a cloth mother
  • result: they spent more time with cloth mother
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Theoretical Breakthrough

A
  • Behaviorists had proposed that the infant-mother relationship is classically conditioned as the mother provides nourishment to the child
  • Psychoanalytic approaches described the mother, as the source of ‘oral satisfaction’, as an “anaclitic love
    object”
  • Harry Harlow proposed that attachment develops due
    to the sense of security provided by the other: Security as a base to explore (from ethology)
  • Ultimately leads to an internal working model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

drive reduction theory

A

infants have needs that need to be filled

for example feeding

beheviorist and psychoanalitical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Attachment Theory

A

Theory based on John Bowlby’s work positing that children are biologically predisposed to develop
attachments to caregivers as a means of increasing the chances of their own survival

  • Secure base: The idea that the
    presence of a trusted caregiver provides an infant or toddler with a
    sense of security that makes it
    possible for the child to explore the
    environment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bowlby/Ainsworth Theory

A

oCombo:
Ethological + Psychoanalytic & Cognitive

oFunctions of attachment
-To maintain proximity (& ensure survival)
-To develop feelings of:
effectance, reciprocity, & trust
-To serve as a secure base for exploration
-(Today: to modulate the stress response system)

oOutcome:
o Scheme, or internal working model of what a relationship can be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Stages Bowlby/Ainsworth
Theory of Attachment

A

oPreattachment (0-2 mos – innate signals – crying to obtain
comfort – up to emergence of social smile)

oAttachment-in-the-making (6 wks – 6-8 mos) respopnd to
familiar face by smiling, laughing, & babbling -up to fear of strangers

oClear-cut attachment (active initiation in proximity seeking;
6-8 mos – 18 mos) Increasing separation anxiety

oReciprocal relationships (18-24 months on) increased
understanding of parent’s feeling; mutual understanding; can
gradually better understand & tolerate separation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Measuring Attachment: The Strange Situation Procedure Developed by Mary Ainsworth

A
  • Based on theoretical constructs in theory
  • Maintenance of proximity, secure base from which to explore, & feelings of effectance, reciprocity, & trust
  • A series of episodes involving strangers, new situations, separations, & reunions
  • Measures of both + and - behaviour
  • Most appropriate during Stage 3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

strange situation

A

step 1: mother and child play

step 2: mother,child,starnger

step 3: child and stranger (mom leaves)

step 4 : mom comes back - mom and child

step 5: just child

step 6: child and stranger

step 6: child and mom(mom comes back and starnger leaves)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Classification Scheme

A
  • Secure (Type B)

most infants are secure

– when alone in room with their mothers, they explore -
constantly looking back, vocalizing or returning; continually involving Mom in play

– when stranger enters, show wariness but not distress

– when mother leaves, infant becomes anxious

– when mother returns, infant seeks contact & appears happy at the reunion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Classification Scheme

A
  • Insecure Avoidant (Type A)
    Too independent :
    -indifferent to their mom’s behaviour.
    -Readily separates and explore without involving her
    -no wariness of strangers
    -not upset when mom leaves or happy when she returns
  • ** Insecure Resistant/Ambivalent (Type C)**
    cling extraordinarily in SS task.
    -Stay close & do not explore.
    -Very wary of stranger.
    -Very distressed when Mom leaves.
  • But ambivalent on her return
  • Disorganized/Disoriented (Type D)
  • Goes to parent reluctantly, sometimes looking away;
    Sometimes seems to express fear when with parent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Measuring Attachment Relationship

A
  • B. Secure – 50-70% (N Am)
  • A. Avoidant – 10-20%
  • C. Resistant – 10-20 (N Am)- anxious
  • D. Disorganized- disoriented – 5-10%

Percentages are similar around the world, with some variation. In many SE Asian cultures A, Avoidant, is not seen at all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Father-infant attachment

A
  • Once thought that infants must have an exclusive attachment, and to the mother
  • But infants can have multiple attachments
  • A secure attachment w/father can counter some of the negative outcome of insecure attachment w/mother
  • Lack of a secure attachment w/either parent is very damaging to self esteem, outcome, etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Correlations between parenting behavior
and infant attachment

A
  • Highest correlation is with sensitive, responsive parenting
  • Contingency
  • Warm
  • Responsiveness
  • These qualities at 4 months “predict” attachment at 12 months
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outcomes of Infant Attachment

A
  • Theoretical predictions are, in general, supported throughout pre- & elementary yrs
  • Type B > better relations w/peers & adults, pro- social behaviour & success in school
  • Others > behaviour problems, aggression, noncompliance, peer interaction problems
  • Even seen in adult attachment with others
17
Q

Why are these outcomes seen?

A

Two possibilities:

  • Lasting effects of early experience: internal working model
  • Continuing parenting patterns & parent/child interaction quality
18
Q

Internal Working Model

A
  • Suggested that infants develop an “internal working model” of relationships,

-how relationships should work

  • This is what accounts for the continuity with other friendships in childhood
  • And into adulthood
  • Considerable evidence for this in childhood and adulthood
  • How about infancy?
19
Q

Internal Working Model in Infancy

A
  • 21 infants 12-16 months
  • Evaluated in SS Procedure: 10 secure, 11 insec
  • Then Test of Internal Working Model
20
Q

method

A
  • Infants habituated to the small figure at the bottom of the hill crying, while large figure sat on the plateau

(habituation)

  • Following habituation, there were 4 test trials, 2 of a “responsive” and 2 of an “unresponsive” large figure
  • The order of presentation was counterbalanced
  • In each case, the small figure cried at the beginning of the trials, and then whimpered
  • Large figure either comes back down the hill, or goes on to the top
  • The DV was total looking time to each type of display
21
Q

Prediction

A
  • Predicted that infants would be most surprised, would look longest, to the behavior that violated their expectations
  • So – which should the securely attached infants look at longest?

the one that the big figure stayed far from small figure

  • And the insecurely attached?
22
Q

Results & Conclusions

A

secure looked longer to unresponsive caregiver and insecure look longer at responsive caregiver (not by a lot)

they understand how relationship should look

Taken as support for the notion of an internal working model, even in early infancy

23
Q

How important is attachment?

A
  • Yes an early attachment can “buffer” later difficult experiences
  • But it is not an innocculation…..
  • But are there lasing effects from the lack of an early attachment?
  • Children who were institutionalized from early infancy AND if they did not, have the opportunity to form early
    attachments, do have lifelong difficulties
24
Q

The Bucharest
Early Intervention
Project

A

The BEIP was the first ever randomized trial of foster care as intervention for social deprivation associated with institutionalization

▪ 136 institutionalized children between 6 and 31 months
initially assessed at baseline (Mean Age=20 months)

▪ 67 randomly assigned to remain in institution (IG)

▪ 69 randomly assigned to foster care (FCG) These two groups matched in birth weight

▪ 72 never-institutionalized children (NIG) matched on age and gender serve as controls

what they found: that earlier fostering had a lot of recovering later fostering not as much but still better then never fostered - they were more likely to secure-attach early on and less likely to depressiion or axiety compering to never fostered children

non fostered children also were more likely to act the same way with people who were close to and who they didnt know/werent

25
Q

Does infant daycare compromise attachment?

A
  • If quality day care, no negative effects – equal percentage of Securely Attached
  • Indeed can even mitigate poor parent-child relationship at home
  • Results are different in low quality day-cares, or in care settings in which there is rapid turn-over of caregivers
26
Q

Are there other factors that can change
attachment security?

A
  • Yes. Changes in family situation
  • If lead to more stability and functionality in the home, the quality of attachment can improve
  • If lead to less stability and more dysfunctionality in the home, the quality of attachment can be compromised
27
Q

proximity seeking

A

trying to get close to mom

28
Q

what is the function of attachment ?

A
  • it serve as a buffer/regulate for stress in new situations and allows kids to explore their enviroment
  • when infants faced something scary and they were with their mothers the amygdala were less active then when they were by themselves
29
Q

what determines attachment style

A
  • parenting

-secure attachment: sensitive parenting

-insecure/avoidant: over-involved parenting

-insecure/resistent: incosistent or unresponsive parenting